FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2983002632> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2983002632 abstract "Full text Figures and data Side by side Abstract eLife digest Introduction Results Discussion Materials and methods References Decision letter Author response Article and author information Metrics Abstract Purkinje neurons are central to cerebellar function and show membrane bistability when recorded in vitro or in vivo under anesthesia. The existence of bistability in vivo in awake animals is disputed. Here, by recording intracellularly from Purkinje neurons in unanesthetized larval zebrafish (Danio rerio), we unequivocally demonstrate bistability in these neurons. Tonic firing was seen in depolarized regimes and bursting at hyperpolarized membrane potentials. In addition, Purkinje neurons could switch from one state to another spontaneously or with current injection. While GABAAR or NMDAR were not required for bursting, activation of AMPARs by climbing fibers (CFs) was sufficient to trigger bursts. Further, by recording Purkinje neuron membrane potential intracellularly, and motor neuron spikes extracellularly, we show that initiation of motor neuron spiking is correlated with increased incidence of CF EPSPs and membrane depolarization. Developmentally, bistability was observed soon after Purkinje neuron specification and persists at least until late larval stages. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.001 eLife digest Ever wonder how you keep your balance? This is something that we learn to do as toddlers, and it involves the coordinated effort of various muscles in the body. An area at the base of the brain called the cerebellum controls this effort, and synchronizes our muscles by sending messages in the form of electrical signals along cells called Purkinje neurons. These signals consist of steady ‘tonic’ activity or short ‘bursts’ of activity. Previous studies in unconscious mammals suggest that these neurons can spontaneously switch between the two types of electrical signals. However, it is not clear whether this switch occurs in awake animals, or how these nerve activities control muscle movements. It is technically challenging to record the voltage of single Purkinje neurons of conscious rodents, so Sengupta and Thirumalai avoided this problem by using zebrafish larvae instead. These larvae are small, transparent and lack a skull, which makes it possible to record the activity of the cerebellum using tiny glass electrodes. The experiments show that even when the larvae are awake, the Purkinje cells produce either spontaneous bursts or tonic activity and they can readily switch between the two. The switch is controlled in part by the voltage on the neurons' surface. A positive voltage is called the ‘up’ state, while a negative voltage is dubbed the ‘down’ state. Neurons in the ‘up’ state produced tonic pulses, while neurons in the ‘down’ state produced short bursts of activity with the help of an ion channel called AMPAR. Cells called motor neurons in the spinal cord carry the final command from the nervous system to the muscles. Sengupta and Thirumalai recorded the activity of motor neurons and Purkinje neurons at the same time. This revealed that Purkinje neurons receive a copy of the motor command that goes to the muscle and produce short bursts of electrical activity in response. This effect required AMPAR activity, and was blocked by molecules that inhibit AMPAR. Furthermore, Sengupta and Thirumalai report that the timing of these short bursts with respect to the motor command changes from one Purkinje neuron to another. Future work will investigate how the Purkinje neurons receive and process the information in the motor command. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.002 Introduction Cerebellar Purkinje neurons have long fascinated neuroscientists due to their elaborate dendritic arbors (Ramón y Cajal, 1911), and their high rates of spontaneous activity in vitro (Llinás and Sugimori, 1980; Raman and Bean, 1999; Han and Bell, 2003) and in vivo (Armstrong et al., 1979; Kitamura and Häusser, 2011). Being the sole output neuron of the cerebellar cortex, the firing patterns of Purkinje neurons are functionally significant for motor co-ordination and motor learning (Thach, 1968; Medina, 2011; Yang and Lisberger, 2014; Hewitt et al., 2015). In addition, mammalian Purkinje neurons exhibit membrane bistability in vitro (Llinás and Sugimori, 1980; Oldfield et al., 2010) and in vivo under anesthesia (Loewenstein et al., 2005; Schonewille et al., 2006), transitioning between ‘up’ and ‘down’ states. The existence of bistability in Purkinje neurons of awake animals has been the subject of some debate (Schonewille et al., 2006; Yartsev et al., 2009; Engbers et al., 2013) not least because of the difficulty of obtaining intracellular recordings from Purkinje neurons of awake animals. Zebrafish are a convenient model system for studying the intracellular dynamics of Purkinje neurons using whole-cell patch clamp recording in vivo in the context of simple motor behaviors. The zebrafish cerebellum has three major parts namely, the corpus cerebelli (CCe), the valvula cerebelli (Va) and the vestibulo lateral lobe which is subdivided into eminentia granularis and lobus caudalis cerebelli (Bae et al., 2009; Hibi and Shimizu, 2012). Of these only the CCe and Va show the characteristic three layered architecture (Hashimoto and Hibi, 2012). We have focused on Purkinje neurons in the CCe. The structure and circuitry of CCe in zebrafish are similar to that seen in electric fish and in mammals (Meek et al., 2008; Hashimoto and Hibi, 2012). As in mammals, Purkinje neurons in zebrafish also receive excitatory inputs from parallel fibers (PFs) and climbing fibers (CFs) and inhibition from stellate cells (Figure 1A). Purkinje neurons in zebrafish, similar to mammalian Purkinje neurons, also have large planar dendritic arbors decorated with spines (Miyamura and Nakayasu, 2001). However, unlike mammals, zebrafish Purkinje neurons do not project to deeper layers but to efferent cells whose somata are present in the Purkinje cell layer or slightly ventral to it (Bae et al., 2009; Takeuchi et al., 2015). These efferent cells, also called the eurydendroid cells, receive short axons from the Purkinje neurons, send long projections outside the cerebellum (Bae et al., 2009; Heap et al., 2013; Takeuchi et al., 2015) and are equivalent to the mammalian deep cerebellar nuclear cells (Figure 1A). Zebrin II (aldolase-c, fructose bis-phosphate, a; aldoca) is expressed in all Purkinje neurons in zebrafish (Miyamura and Nakayasu, 2001; Bae et al., 2009), although it is expressed in only a subset of Purkinje neurons in mammals (Doré et al., 1990; Brochu et al., 1990; Leclerc et al., 1992; Sillitoe et al., 2004) and birds (Pakan et al., 2007; Iwaniuk et al., 2009; Corfield et al., 2015; Vibulyaseck et al., 2015). We use the aldoca promoter to fluorescently label Purkinje neurons specifically so as to target them for whole-cell patch clamp recordings (Tanabe et al., 2010; Takeuchi et al., 2015). Figure 1 Download asset Open asset Zebrafish cerebellar circuitry and experimental preparation. (A) Schematic of the cerebellar circuitry in zebrafish. PN: Purkinje neuron; E: Eurydendroid cell; G: Granule cell; S: Stellate cell. (B) Schematic of the set up for in vivo whole cell recordings in unanesthetized zebrafish larvae. (C) Schematic of the zebrafish larval brain with the cerebellum in green. (D) Mosaic expression of aldoca:gap43-Venus in Purkinje neurons. (E) Patched cell shown filled with sulphorhodamine. (F) Co-localization of sulphorhodamine filled cell with membrane-targeted Venus expression. Scale bar = 10 μm. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.003 In zebrafish, cerebellar cells start to differentiate at three days post fertilization (dpf) and a simple layered structure forms by 5 dpf (Bae et al., 2009). Purkinje neurons appear at 2.8 dpf and their numbers stabilize at around 300 neurons by 5 dpf (Bae et al., 2009; Hamling et al., 2015). By this stage, PF and CF inputs to Purkinje neurons are already present (Bae et al., 2009; Takeuchi et al., 2015; Hamling et al., 2015). Previous studies using calcium imaging and extracellular recording have shown that Purkinje neurons are electrically active at 6–7 dpf (Ahrens et al., 2012; Hsieh et al., 2014; Matsui et al., 2014). Here, we undertake a thorough characterization of spontaneous activity patterns in Purkinje neurons of larval zebrafish. We show that zebrafish Purkinje neurons exhibit membrane bistability in vivo and that the state changes are dependent on AMPAR-mediated CF inputs. Results Purkinje neurons show three types of spontaneous events We targeted Purkinje neurons for extracellular and intracellular recordings using aldoca promoter driven Venus expression as a marker (Figure 1B–F). Loose patch recordings from larval zebrafish Purkinje neurons revealed either tonically spiking (Figure 2A, top trace) or bursting (Figure 2A, bottom trace) activity. We also observed two types of events in all the cells we recorded from and these differed in amplitude and waveform (Figure 2B; N = 6 cells). The large amplitude events had two distinct phases typical of CF mediated responses that have been extracellularly recorded in mormyrid fish (Alviña and Sawtell, 2014) and in zebrafish (Hsieh et al., 2014). The small amplitude events resembled the simple spikes recorded earlier in the above mentioned studies. Figure 2 Download asset Open asset Spontaneous activity in Purkinje neurons. (A) Representative traces of loose patch recording from a Purkinje neuron at 7 dpf showing tonic (top trace) and bursting (bottom trace) activity patterns. Small amplitude events (red arrowheads) interspersed with large amplitude events (blue arrowheads) can be seen. (B) Superimposed events of large amplitude (blue) and small amplitude (red) events from one cell showing the mean in the respective colour (N = 6 cells). (C–E) Intracellularly, Purkinje neurons show three types of events. Current clamp recordings of spontaneous activity at −65 mV (C) and −45 mV (D) showing large amplitude events (blue arrowheads, C, D), small amplitude narrow spikes (red arrowheads, C, D) and broad spikes (green arrowheads, D). (E) Superimposed events from one cell with mean shown in the respective colour for each type of event. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.004 To further investigate these events in greater detail, we performed whole cell patch clamp on these neurons. We recorded from 7 dpf larvae showing mosaic expression of aldoca:gap43-Venus in Purkinje neurons (Figure 1B–F). All cells had input resistances of above 800 MΩ (2.8 ± 0.75 GΩ, N = 13 cells) and capacitance ranging from 5.6 to 18 pF (13 ± 2.1 pF). Resting membrane potential varied from −40.5 mV to −60.2 mV (−50.3 ± 2.1 mV). As observed in the extracellular recordings, we found mainly two modes of spontaneous activity when we recorded in whole cell mode: bursting and tonic (Figure 2C,D). 6 out of 13 cells showed bursts of activity punctuated by large amplitude events (Figure 2C, blue arrowheads), while the rest showed tonic spiking interspersed with broad spikes and large amplitude events (Figure 2C,D, green and blue arrowheads respectively). Cells in the bursting mode showed narrow attenuated spikes riding atop depolarizations (Figure 2C, red arrowheads). Spikes were of larger amplitude and occurred at higher frequencies during bursts than in the tonic mode (Table 1). Narrow attenuated spikes, broad spikes and large amplitude events had distinct peak amplitudes and kinetics (Figure 2E and Table 1; Source data in Table 1—source data 1). By comparison with in vitro recordings of Purkinje neurons in the central lobe of mormyrid fish (Han and Bell, 2003; de Ruiter et al., 2006), we concluded that the narrow spikes were sodium-dependent action potentials, broad spikes were calcium-mediated spikes and the large amplitude events were CF EPSPs. Nevertheless, since these are the first intracellular recordings from zebrafish Purkinje neurons, we next confirmed that this was indeed the case. Table 1 Summary of properties of narrow spikes, broad spikes and large amplitude events observed in Purkinje neurons at 7 dpf (N = 13 cells) https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.005 Narrow spikes (bursts, 1152 events)Narrow spikes (tonic, 997 events)Large amplitude events (758 events)Broad spikes (79 events)Peak amplitude (mV)15.9 ± 0.1711 ± 0.0951.2 ± 0.2532.8 ± 0.6Frequency (Hz)34.8 ± 4.511.7 ± 1.11.5 ± 0.075.6 ± 3.8Full width at half max. amp (ms)7.7 ± 0.111.4 ± 0.115.8 ± 0.364.7 ± 5.4Rise time, 10–90% (ms)3.1 ± 0.13.6 ± 0.12.2 ± 0.046.5 ± 1.2 Table 1—source data 1 Amplitudes and kinetics of the three types of spontaneous events. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.006 Download elife-09158-data1-v1.xlsx Narrow spikes are sodium action potentials To test whether narrow spikes are sodium action potentials, we bath applied 1 μM Tetrodotoxin (TTX) and observed that all types of spontaneous activity were abolished (Figure 3A; N = 3 cells). Since TTX abolishes network activity as well, we next included 5 mM QX-314, an intracellular sodium channel blocker in our patch internal solution. QX-314 abolished the ability of cells to fire action potentials even when depolarized (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). In the presence of QX-314, while narrow spikes were eliminated, large amplitude events could still be seen (Figure 3B, N = 5 cells). In a separate set of experiments, we left sodium channels intact, but blocked network activity using a cocktail of synaptic receptor antagonists. Here, we observed that the large amplitude events were eliminated. Further, the cells were depolarized (−41.3 ± 0.56 mV) and fired tonically at 38.1 ± 7.4 Hz (Figure 3C; N = 5 cells). These spikes are sodium action potentials as they were abolished in the presence of TTX (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). These experiments demonstrate that the narrow spikes are sodium action potentials and that zebrafish Purkinje neurons fire sodium spikes tonically even when isolated from the network. Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all Download asset Open asset Small events are sodium dependent action potentials. (A) Tetrodotoxin (TTX) abolishes sodium action potentials in Purkinje neurons (N = 3 cells). Representative trace from one cell in the absence (top trace) and presence (bottom trace) of 1 μM TTX. This cell rested at −60 mV. (B) QX-314 also abolishes sodium action potentials (N = 5 cells). Representative trace from one cell showing absence of sodium spikes. This cell rested at −53 mV. (C) Narrow sodium action potentials occur even in the presence of synaptic receptor blockers (N = 5 cells). Representative trace from one cell in the absence (top trace) and presence (bottom trace) of APV, CNQX and Bicuculline or Gabazine. This cell rested at −42 mV. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.007 Broad spikes are dependent on voltage-dependent calcium channel activation We frequently observed broad spikes being recruited during depolarizing current steps. The rheobase for the broad spikes (43.1 ± 7.1 pA; N = 8 cells) was consistently higher than that of sodium spikes (8.6 ± 1.2 pA; N = 7 cells; p < 0.001; Mann–Whitney; Figure 4A). These broad spikes could be elicited by strong depolarization, even in the presence of TTX (Figure 4B), indicating that these events do not require voltage-gated sodium channels. We next tested whether the broad spikes required the activation of voltage-gated calcium channels by bath applying the calcium channel blocker, cadmium. Broad spikes were abolished after exposure to 200 μM Cadmium chloride (Figure 4C), thus indicating that these events are calcium spikes triggered when the cell is depolarized. Calcium spikes were seldom observed in cells that were in the bursting mode, but were much more prevalent in the tonic mode (Figure 2C,D; N = 7 cells). Figure 4 Download asset Open asset Broad events are calcium spikes. (A) Calcium spikes have higher rheobase than sodium spikes (N = 8 cells). Representative trace of current clamp recordings of cellular response from one cell to current injections (grey, bottom panel) showing calcium spikes (green arrowheads) being recruited at higher level of depolarization than sodium spikes (red arrowheads). (B) Representative traces of current clamp recordings from another cell in TTX to the same current injection protocol as in A. (C) Responses shown by the same cell as in B after 200 µM cadmium chloride was added to the bath (N = 4 cells). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.010 Large amplitude events are putative CF EPSPs The large amplitude events that we observed in zebrafish Purkinje neurons appeared very similar in shape and amplitude to the all or none CF EPSPs previously recorded in vitro in Purkinje neurons in the central lobe of the cerebellum of mormyrid fish (Han and Bell, 2003; de Ruiter et al., 2006). Similar to the mormyrid CF-EPSPs, these large amplitide events were always about 50 mV in amplitude and had a sharp peak and a broad shoulder (Figure 5A, inset and Table 1). To test whether the large amplitude events are of synaptic origin, we depolarized and hyperpolarized the neuron and measured peak amplitude and inter-event intervals at various membrane potentials. As will be expected of synaptic events, we observed that the peak amplitude decreased linearly with increasing depolarization (Figure 5A, Pearson's r = −0.8, p < 0.001, N = 5 cells), while the inter-event interval did not change (Figure 5B; Pearson's r = −0.04, p = 0.33). To confirm that the large amplitude events are AMPA-receptor mediated CF synaptic inputs, we recorded in voltage clamp mode and bath applied various glutamatergic receptor antagonists. In the presence of the NMDAR blocker APV, the large amplitude events were not affected (Figure 5—figure supplement 1, N = 5 cells). However, the AMPAR blocker CNQX completely abolished the large amplitude events (Figure 5C; N = 12 cells), thus showing that these are indeed AMPAR-mediated synaptic currents. Consistent with this, these events reversed at around +12 mV (Figure 5D), close to AMPAR reversal potential. We next stimulated the CFs at their point of entry into the cerebellum in the presence of APV and Gabazine to eliminate NMDAR-dependent and GABAAR-dependent synaptic responses. At low stimulation intensities, no response was seen (Figure 5E, flat line). As the stimulus amplitude was gradually increased, large amplitude EPSCs similar in size to the spontaneously occurring large amplitude events were seen (Figure 5E). These were all-or-none in that no EPSCs of intermediate amplitudes were seen. When CNQX was added to the bath, the all-or-none CF EPSCs were completely abolished, confirming that the large amplitude events are AMPAR mediated all-or-none CF EPSPs. Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all Download asset Open asset Large amplitude events are climbing fiber (CF) EPSPs mediated by AMPARs. (A) Mean peak amplitude of large amplitude events as a function of the holding potential. Inset: Expanded trace of a single large amplitude event to illustrate the slow kinetics and large amplitude. Inset x-axis: 400 ms; y-axis: 47 mV. (B) Mean inter-event interval as a function of holding potential. Error bars indicate standard error of mean in A and B (N = 5 cells). (C) Representative trace of a Purkinje neuron recorded in voltage clamp mode at −65 mV before and after application of CNQX. (D) Current-voltage relation of CF EPSCs (N = 3 cells). (E) Representative trace showing all-or-none EPSCs upon stimulation of CFs in the presence of APV and Gabazine (top trace; N = 7 cells). Stimulation at 500 μA resulted in either transmission failure (flat line) or EPSCs of similar amplitudes. In the same cell, all-or-none EPSCs were abolished by the addition of CNQX (bottom trace; N = 5 cells). Grey arrowhead shows stimulus artifact. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.011 In addition to the CF EPSCs, we also observed small amplitude synaptic currents (Figure 5—figure supplement 2, panel A, green arrowheads), which were also abolished by CNQX, suggesting that these are putative PF mediated synaptic currents. CF and PF EPSCs were distinct in their amplitudes, with CF EPSCs consistently crossing 200 pA in peak amplitude while the PF EPSCs were usually smaller than 100 pA (Figure 5—figure supplement 2, panel B; p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney test). We computed the coeffecient of variation (CV) of peak amplitudes of CF and PF EPSCs and found that the PF EPSCs had consistently larger CVs across cells (Figure 5—figure supplement 2, panel C; N = 6 cells; p = 0.0087, Mann–Whitney). The same neuron can toggle between bursting and tonic states Our data thus far indicated that Purkinje neurons when recorded in vivo showed bursting or tonic activity and that the activity consisted of sodium and calcium spikes as well as AMPAR-mediated all-or-none CF EPSPs. We next wanted to investigate if there were two distinct populations of Purkinje neurons or whether the same neurons can toggle between these two states. As mentioned above, blocking synaptic receptors with APV, CNQX and Bicuculline/Gabazine eliminates bursting and causes the neurons to show tonic spiking (Figure 3C; N = 5 cells). We also found that Purkinje neurons could spontaneously toggle between the bursting and tonic states (Figure 6A). 3 out of 8 tonic cells spontaneously hyperpolarized during the course of our recording and entered the bursting state. Conversely, 4 out of 11 cells spontaneously depolarized and toggled from the bursting to tonically firing state. We examined the basal membrane potential in bursting and tonic cells and found that tonic cells were significantly more depolarized (−43.7 ± 1.1 mV, N = 8 cells) compared to bursting cells (−56.3 ± 1.6 mV; N = 11 cells; p < 0.001; Mann–Whitney; Figure 6B). In addition, 4 of 4 bursting cells could be made to fire tonically by depolarizing them and 4 of 4 tonic cells could generate bursts when they were hyperpolarized with negative current. When we bath applied CNQX, APV and Bicuculline, tonic cells lost the ability to generate bursts upon hyperpolarization and became silent (N = 5 cells). To understand which synaptic receptors were involved in triggering bursts, we bath applied Gabazine, APV or CNQX individually. In the presence of 40 μM APV (N = 5 cells) Purkinje neurons were still able to generate bursts (Figure 6C). In the presence of 10 μM Gabazine (N = 10 cells), bursts, though of altered shape and amplitude, could still be seen (Figure 6D). However, 20 μM CNQX completely abolished bursting behavior (Figure 6E; N = 12 cells), indicating that AMPAR and not GABAAR or NMDAR were responsible for triggering bursts in the hyperpolarized state. From these experiments, we conclude that Purkinje neurons have two stable states. Tonic spiking occurs in the ‘up’ state and when the neurons are in the ‘down’ state, AMPAR-mediated synaptic inputs can toggle the cell to ‘up’ states thus generating bursts. Figure 6 Download asset Open asset Purkinje neurons toggle between bursting and tonic states as a function of membrane potential and AMPAR-mediated synaptic input. (A) Representative trace of a bursting cell (bursts not shown) which rested at −65 mV spontaneously depolarizing and spiking tonically. (B) Scatter plot of membrane potential of cells in tonic vs bursting modes showing that tonic modes occur at more depolarized potentials than bursting mode (N = 8 cells for tonic mode and 11 cells for bursting mode). (C) Representative trace of a cell in the absence (top trace) and presence (bottom trace) of APV. This cell rested at −58 mV (N = 6 cells). (D) Representative trace of a cell in the absence (top trace) and presence (bottom trace) of Gabazine. This cell rested at −57 mV (N = 10 cells). (E) Representative trace of a cell in the absence (top trace) and presence (bottom trace) of CNQX. This cell rested at −60 mV (N = 12 cells). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.014 Toggling to ‘up’ states is triggered by CF-EPSPs The CF to Purkinje neuron synapse is one of the strongest excitatory synapses in the CNS. We hypothesized that CF EPSPs can be the source of AMPAR-mediated strong excitation that toggles the Purkinje neuron to ‘up’ states. If this were true, burst onsets must be highly correlated with CF-EPSPs. Indeed, we observed that burst initiation was usually marked by the presence of CF-EPSPs (Figure 7A, blue arrowheads). When the burst initiation was calculated from the first sodium spike (Figure 7A, red arrowhead), we observed a significant increase in the number of CF-EPSPs from an average of 32.34 events per 200 ms bin to 92 events in a 200 ms bin immediately preceding the spike (Figure 7B; N = 5 cells; p < 0.001; Chi-square test). Next, we stimulated CF in the presence of Gabazine and APV and observed that CF activation triggered bursting in Purkinje neurons without fail (Figure 7C; N = 5 cells). Addition of CNQX abolishes the ability of CF stimulation to trigger CF-EPSPs and to trigger bursts (Figure 7D; N = 5 cells). These data argue that AMPAR-mediated CF-EPSPs are sufficient to trigger bursting in Purkinje neurons when the neurons are in the hyperpolarized state. Figure 7 Download asset Open asset Bursting is triggered by AMPAR-mediated olivary synaptic inputs. (A) Representative trace showing CF EPSPs (blue arrowheads) occurring near burst onset as defined by the first sodium spike (red arrowhead). (B) Peri-event time histogram showing CF EPSPs clustered before the start of bursts. For every burst onset as defined by the first sodium spike, the number of CF EPSPs within a 10 s window was calculated in bins of 10 ms. This was repeated for five cells and the results pooled. Only a 2 s window around burst onset is shown for greater clarity. (C) Representative trace showing that stimulation of CF triggers bursts. The stimulus intensity was set in voltage clamp mode at a value that did not yield any failures (N = 5 cells). (D) Same cell after CNQX was added to the bath solution. Grey arrowheads indicate stimulus artifacts in C and D. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09158.015 Bursts are triggered during motor episodes To determine the functional relevance of toggling between states, we recorded intracellularly from Purkinje neurons while simultaneously recording fictive motor patterns. We found that motor episode initiation was usually accompanied by the initiation of bursting in the Purkinje neuron (Figure 8A; N = 5 cells). Since bursting was triggered by CF-EPSPs (Figure 7), we first sought to determine whether motor episode initiation was accompanied by increased incidence of CF-EPSPs. Figure 8B shows a raster plot of CF EPSPs with respect to motor episode initiation across 43 motor episodes and 5 Purkinje neurons. The duration of each motor episode is shown by the length of the green-shaded box. CF-EPSPs tended to be clustered around the initiation of motor episodes (Figure 8B and 0 on x-axis). The number of CF-EPSPs occurring within a 1 s window after motor episode initiation (169) was significantly higher than average (40, p < 0.001, Chi-square test; Figure 8C). To determine whether the increased incidence of CF-EPSPs in this window, resulted in increased bursting in the Purkinje neuron, we plotted the membrane potential of Purkinje neurons within a 1 s window around the start of motor episodes (Figure 8D). In the cell shown in Figure 8D, CFs triggered depolarization within 500 ms after the initiation of motor episodes in 80.4% trials, while in 17% trials, the CF-triggered depolarization occurred within 500 ms before motor onset. In 3% trials, the cell did not show significant change in membrane potential in this window. We next compared motor-episode related bursting across the 5 Purkinje neurons we recorded from by computing average membrane potential in a 1 s window around the start of motor episodes (Figure 8E). The membrane potential at +0.5 s was significantly higher by 17 ± 0.93 mV (N = 107 trials, p < 0.001) than that at −0.5 s, when motor episodes were aligned at 0 s (Figure 8D,E). However, depolarization latency and reliability were variable across the cells we recorded from. We found that motor episode-related, CF-triggered bursting was evoked in more than 80% trials in some neurons (cells 3, 4, and 5) while it was relatively less reliable in others (77% for cell 1 and 50% for cell 2). Additionally, the average latency from motor episode onset to depolarization onset was also variable from one motor episode to another within the same cell (Figure 8D) and from one cell to the other (Figure 8E). Taken together, these data indicate that the initiation of motor episodes is accompanied by an increased incidence of CF-EPSPs in the Purkinje neuron, which toggle it to the ‘up’ state. However, individual Purkinje neurons exhibit variability in how they represent the time of initiation of motor episodes. Figure 8 Download asset Open asset Purkinje neuron bursts are timed to occur with motor neuron bursts. (A) Representative trace showing intracellular recording from a Purkinje neuron (top trace) and suction electrode recording from axial myotomes (bottom trace). Purkinje neuron bursts (blue arrowhead) occur together with initiation of motor episodes (green arrowhea" @default.
• W2983002632 created "2019-11-22" @default.
• W2983002632 creator A5036635567 @default.
• W2983002632 creator A5059753544 @default.
• W2983002632 date "2015-08-28" @default.
• W2983002632 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2983002632 title "Author response: AMPA receptor mediated synaptic excitation drives state-dependent bursting in Purkinje neurons of zebrafish larvae" @default.
• W2983002632 doi "https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.09158.020" @default.
• W2983002632 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2983002632 type Work @default.
• W2983002632 sameAs 2983002632 @default.
• W2983002632 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2983002632 countsByYear W29830026322020 @default.
• W2983002632 countsByYear W29830026322021 @default.
• W2983002632 crossrefType "peer-review" @default.
• W2983002632 hasAuthorship W2983002632A5036635567 @default.
• W2983002632 hasAuthorship W2983002632A5059753544 @default.
• W2983002632 hasBestOaLocation W29830026321 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConcept C160268369 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConcept C195221683 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConcept C2776878037 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConcept C61174792 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConceptScore W2983002632C104317684 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConceptScore W2983002632C160268369 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConceptScore W2983002632C169760540 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConceptScore W2983002632C170493617 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConceptScore W2983002632C195221683 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConceptScore W2983002632C2776878037 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConceptScore W2983002632C55493867 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConceptScore W2983002632C61174792 @default.
• W2983002632 hasConceptScore W2983002632C86803240 @default.
• W2983002632 hasLocation W29830026321 @default.
• W2983002632 hasOpenAccess W2983002632 @default.
• W2983002632 hasPrimaryLocation W29830026321 @default.
• W2983002632 hasRelatedWork W1969408040 @default.
• W2983002632 hasRelatedWork W1975776821 @default.
• W2983002632 hasRelatedWork W1981761337 @default.
• W2983002632 hasRelatedWork W2053640662 @default.
• W2983002632 hasRelatedWork W2091629313 @default.
• W2983002632 hasRelatedWork W2154386827 @default.
• W2983002632 hasRelatedWork W2294521703 @default.
• W2983002632 hasRelatedWork W2460329708 @default.
• W2983002632 hasRelatedWork W2944969882 @default.
• W2983002632 hasRelatedWork W3178071059 @default.
• W2983002632 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2983002632 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2983002632 magId "2983002632" @default.
• W2983002632 workType "peer-review" @default.