Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2983142720> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2983142720 endingPage "3516" @default.
- W2983142720 startingPage "3505" @default.
- W2983142720 abstract "As a significantly important part of clinical practice, the professional nursing process can be advanced in many ways. Despite the fact that case reports are regarded to be of a lower quality grade in the hierarchy of evidence, one of the principles of evidence-based medicine is that decision-making should be based on a systematic summary of evidence. However, the evidence on the reporting characteristics of case reports in the nursing field is deficient.To use the CARE guidelines to assess reporting quality and factors influencing the quality of case reports in the nursing field.Nursing science citation indexed (SCI-indexed) journals were identified from the professional website. Each of the identified journals was searched on their website for articles published before December 2017. Twenty-one sub-items on the CARE checklist were recorded as YES, PARTLY, or NO according to information reported by the included studies. The responses were assigned corresponding scores of 1, 0.5, and 0, respectively. The overall score was the sum of the 21 sub-items and was defined as high (more than 15), medium (10.5 to 14.5), and low (less than 10). The means, standard deviations, odds ratios (OR), and the associated 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined using Stata 12.0 software.Ultimately, 184 case reports from 16 SCI-indexed journals were identified, with overall scores ranging from 6.5 to 18 (mean = 13.6 ± 2.3). Of the included case reports, 10.3% were regarded low-quality, 52.7% were considered middle-quality, and 37% were regarded high-quality. There were statistical differences in the mean overall scores of the included case reports with funding versus those without funding (14.2 ± 1.7 vs 13.6 ± 2.4, respectively; P = 0.4456) and journal impact factor < 1.8 versus impact factor ≥ 1.8 (13.3 ± 2.3 vs 13.6 ± 2.4, respectively; P = 0.4977). Five items from the CARE guidelines, 5a (Patient), 6 (Clinical findings), 8c (Diagnostic reasoning), 9 (Therapeutic intervention), and 11d (The main take-away lessons) were well-reported (Reporting rate more than 90%) in most of the included case reports. However, only three items, 2 (Keywords, OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.19-0.92, P = 0.03), 4 (Introduction, OR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.15-0.83, P = 0.017), and 11b (The relevant medical literature, OR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.06-0.56, P = 0.003) were considered better-reported after the CARE guidelines published in 2013.The reporting quality of case reports in the nursing field apparently has not improved since the publication of the CARE guidelines." @default.
- W2983142720 created "2019-11-22" @default.
- W2983142720 creator A5021826156 @default.
- W2983142720 creator A5025116815 @default.
- W2983142720 creator A5045782023 @default.
- W2983142720 creator A5064002872 @default.
- W2983142720 creator A5065820808 @default.
- W2983142720 creator A5080611223 @default.
- W2983142720 date "2019-11-06" @default.
- W2983142720 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2983142720 title "How about the reporting quality of case reports in nursing field?" @default.
- W2983142720 cites W16830788 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W1987474136 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2010454265 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2018490298 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2024126730 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2024369914 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2079296861 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2083931495 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2100095321 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2118015532 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2122278601 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2132012869 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2136008482 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2141705507 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2150267992 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2220464777 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2233046003 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2337474197 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2519337418 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2607403549 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2614694672 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2621281712 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2765794778 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2770580372 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2783261812 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2801102766 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2811409243 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W2888828237 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W4248659602 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W4376453092 @default.
- W2983142720 cites W3141652517 @default.
- W2983142720 doi "https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i21.3505" @default.
- W2983142720 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6854409" @default.
- W2983142720 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31750332" @default.
- W2983142720 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2983142720 type Work @default.
- W2983142720 sameAs 2983142720 @default.
- W2983142720 citedByCount "6" @default.
- W2983142720 countsByYear W29831427202021 @default.
- W2983142720 countsByYear W29831427202022 @default.
- W2983142720 countsByYear W29831427202023 @default.
- W2983142720 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2983142720 hasAuthorship W2983142720A5021826156 @default.
- W2983142720 hasAuthorship W2983142720A5025116815 @default.
- W2983142720 hasAuthorship W2983142720A5045782023 @default.
- W2983142720 hasAuthorship W2983142720A5064002872 @default.
- W2983142720 hasAuthorship W2983142720A5065820808 @default.
- W2983142720 hasAuthorship W2983142720A5080611223 @default.
- W2983142720 hasBestOaLocation W29831427201 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C106881830 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C126397004 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C143095724 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C518773536 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C106881830 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C111472728 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C126322002 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C126397004 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C136764020 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C138885662 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C142724271 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C143095724 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C151956035 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C156957248 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C15744967 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C159110408 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C17744445 @default.
- W2983142720 hasConceptScore W2983142720C180747234 @default.