FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2983384675> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2983384675 endingPage "353" @default.
• W2983384675 startingPage "347" @default.
• W2983384675 abstract "To compare the clinical effect between the lamina osteotomy and former vertebral plates regraft method and total laminectomy and interbody fusion method in treating single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.The clinical data of 167 patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease underwent surgical treatment from January 2010 to December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 92 males and 75 females, aged from 45 to 75 years old with an average of (59.6±12.4) years. The patients were divided into lamina osteotomy and former vertebral plates regraft group(82 cases) and total laminectomy and interbody fusion group(85 cases) according to the different surgical methods used. The general conditions and clinical effects were compared between two groups. General conditions included the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, hospitalization time and the clinical effects included the visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA), Oswestry Dability Index(ODI), MacNab results, epidural fibrosis (EF), the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).All the patients were followed for 18 to 36 months with an average of (24.8±5.7) months, furthermore, there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between two groups. There was no significant difference in general conditions such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, or hospitalization time between two groups. At final follow-up, the VAS, ODI, JOA, of all patients were significantly improved (P<0.05);and the three factors above in the lamina osteotomy and former vertebral plates regraft group respectively were(2.0±1.1) points, (24.0±1.8) %, (19.8±8.2) point, while the results of total laminectomy and interbody fusion group were(2.5±1.6) points, (23.3±2.0)%, and(22.5±8.5) point;there was statistical difference between two groups(P<0.05). According to the standard of MacNab, 59 cases obtained excellent results, 20 good, 3 fair results in the lamina osteotomy and former vertebral plates regraft group;while 47 cases got excellent results, 26 good, and 12 fair results in the total laminectomy and interbody fusion group;there was significant difference between two groups(P<0.05). Sixteen patients(19.51%) with EF and 20 patients(24.39%) with ASD were found in lamina osteotomy and former vertebral plates regraft group;and 30 patients(35.29%) with EF and 37 patients(43.53%) with ASD were found in total laminectomy and interbody fusion group; there was significant difference between two groups(P<0.05).Both two methods can achieve the ideal effects for the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative disease, but the lamina osteotomy and former vertebral plates regraft method can reserve the integrity of posterior ligamentous complex, reducing the incidence of EF and ASD, and is a better surgical method." @default.
• W2983384675 created "2019-11-22" @default.
• W2983384675 creator A5009437589 @default.
• W2983384675 creator A5050834366 @default.
• W2983384675 creator A5074448203 @default.
• W2983384675 creator A5080180213 @default.
• W2983384675 date "2018-04-25" @default.
• W2983384675 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2983384675 title "[Analysis of clinical effects in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative disease by lamina osteotomy and former vertebral plates regraft]." @default.
• W2983384675 doi "https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.04.010" @default.
• W2983384675 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29772861" @default.
• W2983384675 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2983384675 type Work @default.
• W2983384675 sameAs 2983384675 @default.
• W2983384675 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2983384675 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2983384675 hasAuthorship W2983384675A5009437589 @default.
• W2983384675 hasAuthorship W2983384675A5050834366 @default.
• W2983384675 hasAuthorship W2983384675A5074448203 @default.
• W2983384675 hasAuthorship W2983384675A5080180213 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C2777427615 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C2777989353 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C2779281540 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C2779835254 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C2780091945 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C2780375110 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C105702510 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C118552586 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C141071460 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C14184104 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C142724271 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C204787440 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C2775998654 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C2776389721 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C2777427615 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C2777989353 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C2779281540 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C2779835254 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C2780091945 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C2780375110 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C2780775167 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C2780907711 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C44575665 @default.
• W2983384675 hasConceptScore W2983384675C71924100 @default.
• W2983384675 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2983384675 hasLocation W29833846751 @default.
• W2983384675 hasOpenAccess W2983384675 @default.
• W2983384675 hasPrimaryLocation W29833846751 @default.
• W2983384675 hasRelatedWork W1997620789 @default.
• W2983384675 hasRelatedWork W2282284413 @default.
• W2983384675 hasRelatedWork W2347909189 @default.
• W2983384675 hasRelatedWork W2352649520 @default.
• W2983384675 hasRelatedWork W2912841668 @default.
• W2983384675 hasRelatedWork W2920941756 @default.
• W2983384675 hasRelatedWork W2983384675 @default.
• W2983384675 hasRelatedWork W3031749874 @default.
• W2983384675 hasRelatedWork W3111938180 @default.
• W2983384675 hasRelatedWork W3191092374 @default.
• W2983384675 hasVolume "31" @default.
• W2983384675 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2983384675 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2983384675 magId "2983384675" @default.
• W2983384675 workType "article" @default.