FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2984582889> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2984582889 endingPage "623" @default.
• W2984582889 startingPage "618" @default.
• W2984582889 abstract "Response time is a predictive factor for survival of drowning victims and lifesaving. Rescue Water Craft (RWC) are lifeboats very common in lifeguards operations. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of providing effective mouth-to-mouth ventilations and/or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on the RWC while sailing at different speeds. A quasi-experimental cross-over block design was used to test during one minute efforts the effectiveness of Mouth to Mouth ventilation (MM-only) and CRP, at the beach and sailing at two diferents speeds 5 knots(kn) and 10 kn with calm sea. Quality CPR reference were 2015 ERC guidelines. The data obtained from 13 lifeguards were included, that means that 78 resuscitation test were completed. The MM-only performance skills reached 69.7% ± 40.4 for 5 kn and 60.0% ± 41.8 for 10 kn (p = .59). For full CPR, performance was 74.4% ± 24.2 and 68.5% ± 23.9 respectively. Quality of MM and CPR decreased, not significantly, while sailing at 5 kn and 10 kn [(Q-MM; 5 kn: 59.9% ± 37.8 vs. 10 kn: 43.2% ± 41.4, p = .42)(Q-CPR; 5 kn: 64.8% ± 21.2 and 10 kn: 60.6% ± 21.0, p = .44)]. MM-only and CC variables were significantly worse on RJS when compared with resuscitation at the beach (p < .05). A trend for better results by lifeguards previously training on RJS was observed. Resuscitation techniques on board of a RWC are feasible and therefore they could be an option for lifeguards when their training, sea conditions, distance and the victim's characteristics allow it. CPR maneuvers may be highly effective at 10 kn, both for MM-only and CPR, however, the quality of the ventilations dramatically worsen with increasing speed." @default.
• W2984582889 created "2019-11-22" @default.
• W2984582889 creator A5030223649 @default.
• W2984582889 creator A5042576975 @default.
• W2984582889 creator A5051184003 @default.
• W2984582889 creator A5051269466 @default.
• W2984582889 creator A5071023195 @default.
• W2984582889 creator A5079632345 @default.
• W2984582889 creator A5083144103 @default.
• W2984582889 creator A5083387905 @default.
• W2984582889 date "2020-03-01" @default.
• W2984582889 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2984582889 title "Is it feasible “scoop and run while playing” resuscitation on a rescue water craft? A randomized simulation study with lifeguards" @default.
• W2984582889 cites W1870939480 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W1997931648 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2105591777 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2112638833 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2115657636 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2132768474 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2135530606 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2160369761 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2161638340 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2168627407 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2194777694 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2312696344 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2548512020 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2580289052 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2800281614 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2904994748 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2963942692 @default.
• W2984582889 cites W2737219061 @default.
• W2984582889 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.10.045" @default.
• W2984582889 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31982219" @default.
• W2984582889 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2984582889 type Work @default.
• W2984582889 sameAs 2984582889 @default.
• W2984582889 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2984582889 countsByYear W29845828892020 @default.
• W2984582889 countsByYear W29845828892021 @default.
• W2984582889 countsByYear W29845828892022 @default.
• W2984582889 countsByYear W29845828892023 @default.
• W2984582889 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2984582889 hasAuthorship W2984582889A5030223649 @default.
• W2984582889 hasAuthorship W2984582889A5042576975 @default.
• W2984582889 hasAuthorship W2984582889A5051184003 @default.
• W2984582889 hasAuthorship W2984582889A5051269466 @default.
• W2984582889 hasAuthorship W2984582889A5071023195 @default.
• W2984582889 hasAuthorship W2984582889A5079632345 @default.
• W2984582889 hasAuthorship W2984582889A5083144103 @default.
• W2984582889 hasAuthorship W2984582889A5083387905 @default.
• W2984582889 hasConcept C2777055891 @default.
• W2984582889 hasConcept C2778165595 @default.
• W2984582889 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2984582889 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2984582889 hasConceptScore W2984582889C2777055891 @default.
• W2984582889 hasConceptScore W2984582889C2778165595 @default.
• W2984582889 hasConceptScore W2984582889C42219234 @default.
• W2984582889 hasConceptScore W2984582889C71924100 @default.
• W2984582889 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2984582889 hasLocation W29845828891 @default.
• W2984582889 hasLocation W29845828892 @default.
• W2984582889 hasOpenAccess W2984582889 @default.
• W2984582889 hasPrimaryLocation W29845828891 @default.
• W2984582889 hasRelatedWork W1981877114 @default.
• W2984582889 hasRelatedWork W1982627484 @default.
• W2984582889 hasRelatedWork W2010553668 @default.
• W2984582889 hasRelatedWork W2010562419 @default.
• W2984582889 hasRelatedWork W2027936207 @default.
• W2984582889 hasRelatedWork W2158584734 @default.
• W2984582889 hasRelatedWork W2170431845 @default.
• W2984582889 hasRelatedWork W2410610003 @default.
• W2984582889 hasRelatedWork W2730909072 @default.
• W2984582889 hasRelatedWork W3029563244 @default.
• W2984582889 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W2984582889 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2984582889 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2984582889 magId "2984582889" @default.
• W2984582889 workType "article" @default.