FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2986992243> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2986992243 endingPage "261" @default.
• W2986992243 startingPage "251" @default.
• W2986992243 abstract "Feeling Right in The Ambassadors Anne Langendorfer Feeling right was an important idea in nineteenth-century American literature, as many novels from Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852)1 to Mark Twain's Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1884)2 attest. But when in The Ambassadors (1903) James takes up this crucial phrase, he offers readers a new idea: that feeling right can be understood as the meeting point between emotion and ethics for both characters and readers. Throughout the novel, James shows the protagonist, Lambert Strether, struggling with the concept of right feeling: Strether wanted to feel right about it, but could only, at best, for the time, feel vague (315). Strether's desire to feel right opens a gaping vagueness, which leaves readers, too, feeling bewildered. In keeping readers close to Strether through the novel's focalization, James invites the authorial audience to consider not only characters' emotions and ethics but also their own emotions about and ethical judgments of these characters. In The Ambassadors, to feel right is neither a command to readers, as practiced by Stowe,3 nor an entirely ironic statement, as articulated by Twain, but rather a desire shared and interrogated by characters and readers alike. Indeed, both Stowe's and Twain's uses of the phrase feeling right leave behind a persistent question about the efficacy of sympathy: how far can sympathy take readers? In The Ambassadors, James offers readers an opportunity to engage with the notion of feeling right as an emotional process, focalizing the story through Strether's self-questioning dialogue with himself and therefore suggesting that a specific and complex affective education is required of characters and readers in order for anyone to make claims about right feeling. More broadly, I argue, James's concept of emotion is tied to a larger emotional-ethical conversation in the late nineteenth century about the nature of feeling right and how one achieves this condition through reading.4 As Faye Halpern proposes in her clever and generative 2018 investigation of James's meditation on sentimentality in The Bostonians, James is not as dismissive of sentimentality as many critics have argued and indeed is deeply engaged with it. [End Page 251] Halpern suggests that the sentimental novel's reading practice of cultivating readers' sympathetic identification with characters is important in James's work, even as it is often replaced in James's novels by a love of difficulty, a toleration of ambiguity, and judgment borne of critical distance (63). In Emotional Reinventions: Realist-Era Representations Beyond Sympathy (2015), Melanie Dawson argues that James and other realist authors have moved beyond sympathy toward the act of analyzing and cataloging emotion (103). I agree with Halpern and Dawson that James's novels portray emotion differently and therefore create different reading experiences, refusing readers easy sympathetic identification with protagonists like Lambert Strether. But how then do we feel about Strether? His desire to feel right encourages readers to engage with a sustained feeling of affection for the difficulty, ambiguity, and judgment-making process with which James requires readers to engage. If Strether's own right feeling is achieved only through a novel-long process of emotional-ethical change, then we must also attend to the ways in which this process affects readers. Emotion and ethics work together in The Ambassadors to encourage readers to engage ambivalent emotional responses, as Kate Stanley and Joshua Held suggest. In this short essay, I suggest a rhetorical narrative approach that combines ethics with emotion, yielding new insights for understanding James's complex communication to his authorial audience. Given the space limitations, I will offer (drawing on James Phelan's work in Experiencing Fiction) an overarching sketch of the narrative progression from the global instability to key complication to resolution, focusing on the complexities of the ending, to describe this process. I use this framework of narrative progression to insist on the importance of seeing the interactions between the judgments of characters and the authorial audience as integral to understanding the reading experience as one attuned to a skeptical engagement with Strether's understanding of himself as, finally, not only feeling but being right. Narrative Progression and Instabilities: Knowledge, Ethics..." @default.
• W2986992243 created "2019-11-22" @default.
• W2986992243 creator A5054542112 @default.
• W2986992243 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2986992243 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2986992243 title "Feeling Right in The Ambassadors" @default.
• W2986992243 cites W1505700084 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W1507560066 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W1519886599 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W1530325852 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W1549362552 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W1963615063 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W2054822222 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W2072813866 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W2320036600 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W2492828998 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W2559467805 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W2785540836 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W341986502 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W568041303 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W586892741 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W647873832 @default.
• W2986992243 cites W968527600 @default.
• W2986992243 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2019.0023" @default.
• W2986992243 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2986992243 type Work @default.
• W2986992243 sameAs 2986992243 @default.
• W2986992243 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2986992243 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2986992243 hasAuthorship W2986992243A5054542112 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C2779115301 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C42133412 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C107038049 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C11171543 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C122980154 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C124952713 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C138885662 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C142362112 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C15744967 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C2779115301 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C42133412 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C52119013 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C77805123 @default.
• W2986992243 hasConceptScore W2986992243C95457728 @default.
• W2986992243 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2986992243 hasLocation W29869922431 @default.
• W2986992243 hasOpenAccess W2986992243 @default.
• W2986992243 hasPrimaryLocation W29869922431 @default.
• W2986992243 hasRelatedWork W2060369560 @default.
• W2986992243 hasRelatedWork W2130174243 @default.
• W2986992243 hasRelatedWork W2319110001 @default.
• W2986992243 hasRelatedWork W2370416532 @default.
• W2986992243 hasRelatedWork W2386137950 @default.
• W2986992243 hasRelatedWork W2497002848 @default.
• W2986992243 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2986992243 hasRelatedWork W3202178702 @default.
• W2986992243 hasRelatedWork W4298166904 @default.
• W2986992243 hasRelatedWork W4309688651 @default.
• W2986992243 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W2986992243 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2986992243 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2986992243 magId "2986992243" @default.
• W2986992243 workType "article" @default.