FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2987336749> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2987336749 abstract "Experimental designs for evaluating knowledge translation (KT) interventions can provide strong estimates of effectiveness but offer limited insight into how the intervention worked. Consequently, process evaluations have been used to explore the causal mechanisms at work; however, there are limited standards to guide this work. This study synthesizes current evidence of KT process evaluations to provide future methodological recommendations.Peer-reviewed search strategies were developed by a health research librarian. Studies had to be in English, published since 1996, and were not excluded based on design. Studies had to (1) be a process evaluation of a KT intervention study in primary health, (2) be a primary research study, and (3) include a licensed healthcare professional delivering or receiving the intervention. A two-step, two-person hybrid screening approach was used for study inclusion with inter-rater reliability ranging from 94 to 95%. Data on study design, data collection, theoretical influences, and approaches used to evaluate the KT intervention, analysis, and outcomes were extracted by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).Of the 20,968 articles screened, 226 studies fit our inclusion criteria. The majority of process evaluations used qualitative forms of data collection (43.4%) and individual interviews as the predominant data collection method. 72.1% of studies evaluated barriers and/or facilitators to implementation. 59.7% of process evaluations were stand-alone evaluations. The timing of data collection varied widely with post-intervention data collection being the most frequent (46.0%). Only 38.1% of the studies were informed by theory. Furthermore, 38.9% of studies had MMAT scores of 50 or less indicating poor methodological quality.There is widespread acceptance that the generalizability of quantitative trials of KT interventions would be significantly enhanced through complementary process evaluations. However, this systematic review found that process evaluations are of mixed quality and lack theoretical guidance. Most process evaluation data collection occurred post-intervention undermining the ability to evaluate the process of implementation. Strong science and methodological guidance is needed to underpin and guide the design and execution of process evaluations in KT science.This study is not registered with PROSPERO." @default.
• W2987336749 created "2019-11-22" @default.
• W2987336749 creator A5009517041 @default.
• W2987336749 creator A5010229710 @default.
• W2987336749 creator A5014174848 @default.
• W2987336749 creator A5021685703 @default.
• W2987336749 creator A5038995504 @default.
• W2987336749 creator A5070440964 @default.
• W2987336749 creator A5079788193 @default.
• W2987336749 creator A5085565666 @default.
• W2987336749 date "2019-11-07" @default.
• W2987336749 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2987336749 title "Systematic review of the use of process evaluations in knowledge translation research" @default.
• W2987336749 cites W1857352754 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W1965857050 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W1977754542 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W1984234647 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W1990973473 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W1997369007 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2016310311 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2023556159 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2027367308 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2053731901 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2076415548 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2078868555 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2082538594 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2085001923 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2096382053 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2099537015 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2107662268 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2132030277 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2134195583 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2135969380 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2148233314 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2154417355 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2159418632 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2162544110 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2168592755 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2796645918 @default.
• W2987336749 cites W2900704124 @default.
• W2987336749 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1161-y" @default.
• W2987336749 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6836407" @default.
• W2987336749 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31699136" @default.
• W2987336749 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2987336749 type Work @default.
• W2987336749 sameAs 2987336749 @default.
• W2987336749 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2987336749 countsByYear W29873367492020 @default.
• W2987336749 countsByYear W29873367492021 @default.
• W2987336749 countsByYear W29873367492022 @default.
• W2987336749 countsByYear W29873367492023 @default.
• W2987336749 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2987336749 hasAuthorship W2987336749A5009517041 @default.
• W2987336749 hasAuthorship W2987336749A5010229710 @default.
• W2987336749 hasAuthorship W2987336749A5014174848 @default.
• W2987336749 hasAuthorship W2987336749A5021685703 @default.
• W2987336749 hasAuthorship W2987336749A5038995504 @default.
• W2987336749 hasAuthorship W2987336749A5070440964 @default.
• W2987336749 hasAuthorship W2987336749A5079788193 @default.
• W2987336749 hasAuthorship W2987336749A5085565666 @default.
• W2987336749 hasBestOaLocation W29873367491 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C152541439 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C2777921204 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C2779318504 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C87156501 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConceptScore W2987336749C105795698 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConceptScore W2987336749C109359841 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConceptScore W2987336749C111472728 @default.
• W2987336749 hasConceptScore W2987336749C111919701 @default.

• next