FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2989428055> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2989428055 endingPage "223" @default.
• W2989428055 startingPage "203" @default.
• W2989428055 abstract "Abstract Thus far, limited research has been performed on resilient supplier selection —a problem that requires simultaneous consideration of a set of numerical and linguistic evaluation criteria, which are substantially different from traditional supplier selection problem. Essentially, resilient supplier selection entails key sourcing decision for an organization to gain competitive advantage. In the presence of multiple conflicting evaluation criteria, contradicting decision makers, and imprecise decision‐relevant information (DRI), this problem becomes even more difficult to solve with the classical optimization approaches. Possibility distribution‐based multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a viable alternative approach for handling inherent uncertainty of imprecise DRI associated with the evaluation offered by a group of contradicting decision makers. However, prior research focusing on MCDA‐based supplier selection problem has been lacking in the ability to provide a seamless integration of numerical and linguistic evaluation criteria along with the consideration of multiple decision makers. To address these challenges, we present a comprehensive decision‐making framework for ranking a set of suppliers from resiliency perspective. The proposed algorithm is capable of leveraging imprecise and aggregated DRI obtained from crisp numerical assessments and reliability adjusted linguistic appraisals from a group of decision makers. We adapt two popular tools—single‐valued neutrosophic sets (SVNS) and interval‐valued fuzzy sets (IVFS)—and for the first time, extend them to incorporate both crisp and linguistic evaluations in a group decision‐making platform to obtain aggregated SVNS and IVFS decision matrixes. This information is then used to rank the resilient suppliers by using technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution method. We present a case study to illustrate the mechanism of the proposed algorithm. A sensitivity analysis demonstrates the strength of the proposed algorithm to generate alternative ranking scheme with respect to the shifting priorities of evaluation criteria and shows the reliability of the decision‐making framework." @default.
• W2989428055 created "2019-11-22" @default.
• W2989428055 creator A5005930969 @default.
• W2989428055 creator A5058096721 @default.
• W2989428055 creator A5066395624 @default.
• W2989428055 creator A5078145555 @default.
• W2989428055 date "2019-11-13" @default.
• W2989428055 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2989428055 title "A possibility distribution‐based multicriteria decision algorithm for resilient supplier selection problems" @default.
• W2989428055 cites W1519384742 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W1967188039 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W1980564456 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W1983182219 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W1986230455 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W1987177581 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2027107079 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2038199466 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2043407600 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2046343760 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2063149790 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2063202994 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2106790680 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2160313238 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2177196844 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2192101384 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2201498186 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2239810687 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2406470551 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2535172461 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2566080964 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2729264823 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2740544045 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2769870394 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2789352141 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2789475743 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2789613617 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2795405089 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2884675258 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W2890716779 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W3125053135 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W4211007335 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W4247803849 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W4292333025 @default.
• W2989428055 cites W4301347335 @default.
• W2989428055 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1696" @default.
• W2989428055 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2989428055 type Work @default.
• W2989428055 sameAs 2989428055 @default.
• W2989428055 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2989428055 countsByYear W29894280552021 @default.
• W2989428055 countsByYear W29894280552022 @default.
• W2989428055 countsByYear W29894280552023 @default.
• W2989428055 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2989428055 hasAuthorship W2989428055A5005930969 @default.
• W2989428055 hasAuthorship W2989428055A5058096721 @default.
• W2989428055 hasAuthorship W2989428055A5066395624 @default.
• W2989428055 hasAuthorship W2989428055A5078145555 @default.
• W2989428055 hasBestOaLocation W29894280552 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C107327155 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C108713360 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C11105738 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C115988155 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C164226766 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C20701700 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C2778897053 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C42011625 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C44104985 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C58166 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConcept C81917197 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C107327155 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C108713360 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C11105738 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C11413529 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C114614502 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C115988155 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C119857082 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C124101348 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C127413603 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C154945302 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C164226766 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C177264268 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C17744445 @default.
• W2989428055 hasConceptScore W2989428055C189430467 @default.

• next