FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2989713090> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2989713090 endingPage "103483" @default.
• W2989713090 startingPage "103483" @default.
• W2989713090 abstract "Pressure injuries are potentially preventable but frequently occurring adverse events. Intensive care patients have major risk factors for pressure injury with a reported pressure injury prevalence of 12–33%. Multi-faceted interventions, also known as programs or care bundles, are recommended to prevent pressure injuries. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of pressure injury prevention programs in reducing pressure injury prevalence and incidence in the adult intensive care population. It also critically appraised the program components and strategies used to implement these programs. We searched PubMed, EMBASE (embase.com), Ovid MEDLINE, EBSCOhost CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases separately for papers published in English and Chinese from the year of 2000 to May 2018. After removing duplicates, two authors independently screened the title and abstracts, then full-text against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data was extracted by one author and checked by a second author. Quality appraisal was conducted by two authors by using the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set, and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Content analysis was used to categorise program components. Implementation strategies were grouped into six classifications: dissemination strategies, implementation process strategies, integration strategies, capacity building strategies, sustainability strategies, and scale up strategies. Twenty-one peer reviewed papers (12 quality improvement projects, and 9 research papers from 8 studies) were included. Pressure injury prevention programs with 2–11 components were commonly implemented. Common components of the programs included: clarification of staff roles, introducing new roles, repositioning, staff and patient education, support surfaces use, pressure injury risk assessment, skin assessment, nutrition needs assessment, documentation, multidisciplinary team involvement, and mobilisation. Implementation strategies commonly used were education, audit and feedback, and standardising documentation. Five of the eight research studies and one of the quality improvement projects reported significant decrease in pressure injury prevalence, and/or increase in compliance to pressure injury prevention protocols and strategies. Two quality improvement papers reported cost savings of $1 million and £2.6 million respectively after the implementation of the programs. Much of the work on multicomponent pressure injury prevention programs has been undertaken as quality improvement projects and before and after research studies with limited rigour. However, positive outcomes and strong theoretical rationales for the components in the programs suggest that they are beneficial. This calls for future high-quality research such as randomised controlled trials to test the effectiveness of multicomponent interventions and their implementation strategies. Tweetable abstract: Some multicomponent pressure injury prevention programs were found to be effective; however, higher level of research evidence is needed." @default.
• W2989713090 created "2019-12-05" @default.
• W2989713090 creator A5033714017 @default.
• W2989713090 creator A5041756322 @default.
• W2989713090 creator A5044930063 @default.
• W2989713090 creator A5070674454 @default.
• W2989713090 creator A5085941484 @default.
• W2989713090 date "2020-02-01" @default.
• W2989713090 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2989713090 title "The effectiveness of multicomponent pressure injury prevention programs in adult intensive care patients: A systematic review" @default.
• W2989713090 cites W1735233495 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W1894821576 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W1927931489 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2019698808 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2040186964 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2043348492 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2052431186 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2074408811 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2078639305 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2116654531 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2122328334 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2148091826 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2153354517 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2153966067 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2155501486 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2160008943 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W221625658 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2304392835 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2325134225 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2333227434 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2337438891 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2417268443 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2512706249 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2527910541 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2529808469 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2576440140 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2598747756 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2601917368 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2605071747 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2605986360 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2751732558 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2766960227 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2770815766 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2771366623 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2790763997 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2794446197 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2803183181 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2884784816 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2885613452 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2886713530 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W2911283653 @default.
• W2989713090 cites W1992794603 @default.
• W2989713090 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103483" @default.
• W2989713090 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31835122" @default.
• W2989713090 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2989713090 type Work @default.
• W2989713090 sameAs 2989713090 @default.
• W2989713090 citedByCount "43" @default.
• W2989713090 countsByYear W29897130902020 @default.
• W2989713090 countsByYear W29897130902021 @default.
• W2989713090 countsByYear W29897130902022 @default.
• W2989713090 countsByYear W29897130902023 @default.
• W2989713090 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2989713090 hasAuthorship W2989713090A5033714017 @default.
• W2989713090 hasAuthorship W2989713090A5041756322 @default.
• W2989713090 hasAuthorship W2989713090A5044930063 @default.
• W2989713090 hasAuthorship W2989713090A5070674454 @default.
• W2989713090 hasAuthorship W2989713090A5085941484 @default.
• W2989713090 hasBestOaLocation W29897130902 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C152541439 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C2987404301 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConceptScore W2989713090C142724271 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConceptScore W2989713090C152541439 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConceptScore W2989713090C159110408 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConceptScore W2989713090C160735492 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConceptScore W2989713090C162324750 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConceptScore W2989713090C17744445 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConceptScore W2989713090C177713679 @default.
• W2989713090 hasConceptScore W2989713090C189708586 @default.

• next