FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2989776417> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2989776417 endingPage "63" @default.
• W2989776417 startingPage "63" @default.
• W2989776417 abstract "Background. The competitive positions of countries and their companies largely depend on the nature of participation in international economic interaction. It has been proven that countries with high levels of economic development are benefiting from foreign trade through liberalization. However, it remains debatable how much positive expectations identified in trade liberalization theory can be put into practice in economically peripheral countries. The fundamental scientific basis for studying the correlation of economic openness in the context of the impact on economic growth, including ambiguous and contradictory impact of trade liberalization, have been studied by various scholars. However, since antagonists of trade liberalization theory often do not fully understand all the positive effects of its application, research in this area is relevant. The goal of this study is to analyze the development and foundations of trade liberalization theory, as well as to compare projections of the effects of trade liberalization between Ukraine and the EU under the terms of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) and the practical realities. The main results of the research. International trade theory provides explanations for the impact of international trade and the distribution of the gains from trade and particularly trade liberalisation through preferential trade agreements. Classical trade theory supports free trade and advocates against tariffs and restrictions. The assumptions behind the classical trade theory are the following: Completely free trade; no subsidies, tariffs, or commercial restrictions; Frictionless inter-sectoral transfer of labour. However these assumptions do not hold in the real world and gives rise to the debate on the conditions under which free trade provides Gains from Trade. In the Heckscher-Ohlin model of trade, each nation's comparative advantage is traced to its particular endowments of different factors of production: that is, basic inputs such as land, labour, and capital. Since the costs of these inputs in each country will depend on their availability, differences in factor endowments across countries will create differences in comparative advantage. Each country will tend to export items whose production requires intensive use of the factors with which it is abundantly endowed relative to other nations; conversely, each country will import goods whose production requires intensive use of factors that are relatively scarce. Therefore, countries well endowed with land, like Australia and Canada, and indeed Ukraine, are thus expected to export agricultural products (e.g., wheat and wool), while importing products that require the intensive use of labour (e.g., textiles and footwear). The article emphasized that Classical theory and Heckscher-Ohlin theory is further developed by the factor price equalization theory, by Paul A. Samuelson. Economic theory of equalization of factors and prices implies that free trade should lead to trends in the equalization of income, capital and labour in different countries. The example of graphical models illustrates what to expect in an economy that can move from protection to free trade. It has been shown that this will lead to a net increase in welfare. This made it possible to formulate a scientific understanding of why trade theory supports trade liberalization through preferential trade agreements, such as the DCFTA between the EU and Ukraine. The results of this agreement, as shown by the systematization of short— and long-term expectations, should be to increase trade, more effective allocation of resources, equalise wages and stimulate economic growth. According to forecasts, six sectors in Ukraine were expected to generate additional increases in Exports to the EU of over 20% net. However, we stressed that Ukrainian business entities will only gain access to the domestic market if European standards are established and technical regulations are complied with. At the same time, the cost of implementation of EU standards and retrofitting of production should be compensated by the flow of European investment which is going to stimulate restructuring and retrofitting of companies, facilitate new businesses and, as the result, increase the state' revenues. Our personal research has revealed that with 4 years of data since the effective application of DCFTA provisions on Ukraine's exports to the EU, it shows that Ukraine's exports have not significantly improved under the DCFTA. This runs contrary to both the EU and Ukrainian policy objective of the DCFTA as well as traditional economic theory. Conclusions. According to the traditional economic theory, trade liberalization brings not only traditional static gains from specialization, but also the adoption of new technologies and skills, leading to dynamic gains from trade — to higher productivity. But in the case of the practical implementation of the DCFTA on Ukraine's exports to the EU, the opposite consequences were found. It is noted that the results obtained during this study can be used for further research towards optimizing the processes of liberalization and upholding national economic interests in the context of the objective growth of world trade. Our data can also be used to find the real reasons that did not allow the country to benefit from the implementation of the DCFTA, as well as to develop measures to eliminate or minimize the negative effects." @default.
• W2989776417 created "2019-12-05" @default.
• W2989776417 creator A5007017199 @default.
• W2989776417 date "2019-11-23" @default.
• W2989776417 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2989776417 title "TRADE LIBERALIZATION: THEORY, PREDICTING THE CONSEQUENCES OF IMPLEMENTATION AND PRACTICAL REALITIES" @default.
• W2989776417 doi "https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6814.2019.21.63" @default.
• W2989776417 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2989776417 type Work @default.
• W2989776417 sameAs 2989776417 @default.
• W2989776417 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2989776417 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2989776417 hasAuthorship W2989776417A5007017199 @default.
• W2989776417 hasBestOaLocation W29897764171 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C140413371 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C182769425 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C18547055 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C35532855 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C506295513 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C58823610 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C84265765 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C84976871 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConcept C90924733 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C140413371 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C151730666 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C155202549 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C15744967 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C162324750 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C182769425 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C18547055 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C2779343474 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C34447519 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C35532855 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C506295513 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C58823610 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C77805123 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C84265765 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C84976871 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C86803240 @default.
• W2989776417 hasConceptScore W2989776417C90924733 @default.
• W2989776417 hasIssue "21" @default.
• W2989776417 hasLocation W29897764171 @default.
• W2989776417 hasOpenAccess W2989776417 @default.
• W2989776417 hasPrimaryLocation W29897764171 @default.
• W2989776417 hasRelatedWork W1503738328 @default.
• W2989776417 hasRelatedWork W1507823054 @default.
• W2989776417 hasRelatedWork W1586098065 @default.
• W2989776417 hasRelatedWork W184447895 @default.
• W2989776417 hasRelatedWork W1935923938 @default.
• W2989776417 hasRelatedWork W2081123755 @default.
• W2989776417 hasRelatedWork W2332275783 @default.
• W2989776417 hasRelatedWork W3108022302 @default.
• W2989776417 hasRelatedWork W3122224165 @default.
• W2989776417 hasRelatedWork W3124132395 @default.
• W2989776417 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2989776417 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2989776417 magId "2989776417" @default.
• W2989776417 workType "article" @default.