FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2989932482> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2989932482 endingPage "3247" @default.
• W2989932482 startingPage "3240" @default.
• W2989932482 abstract "Purpose To compare outcomes of borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy with 1) patients with BHD undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and 2) patients without BHD undergoing revision hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify patients who underwent arthroscopy from January 2012 to January 2016 by a single fellowship-trained surgeon, including a 2-year follow-up. Patient demographics, comorbid medical conditions, and preoperative outcome scores were compared between patients with BHD (lateral center-edge angle 18° to 25°) who had revision hip arthroscopy to patients with BHD undergoing primary arthroscopy and patients without BHD (lateral center-edge angle >25°) undergoing revision arthroscopy. Cohorts were matched 2:1 by age and body mass index. Multivariate regressions were used to compare Hip Outcome Score, Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL) and Sports subscale (HOS-SS) scores and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) between the cohorts at 2-year follow-up. Binomial regression analysis was used to determine predictors of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). Results There was no statistical difference in age and BMI between the BHD revision (29.1 ± 8.8 years; 25.5 ± 3.58 kg/m2), BHD nonrevision (28.9 ± 8.5 years; 24.6 ± 3.1 kg/m2), and non-BHD revision (29.15 ± 8.6 years; 25.01 ± 3.2 kg/m2) cohorts. There were no statistically significant differences in 2-year clinical outcomes between BHD revision patients and either BHD primary or non-BHD revision patient groups, but BHD revision patients were significantly less likely to achieve PASS for HOS-SS compared with BHD primary and non-BHD revision groups (P = .047 and P = .031, respectively). Conclusion Surgeons should exercise caution when indicating patients for revision hip arthroscopy with BHD. Although the current study lacks statistical power, the available data suggest that patients undergoing revision surgery with BHD may still experience clinical improvement but be less likely to achieve PASS metrics for several patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow up. Level of Evidence III, case-control study. To compare outcomes of borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy with 1) patients with BHD undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and 2) patients without BHD undergoing revision hip arthroscopy for FAIS. A retrospective cohort study was performed to identify patients who underwent arthroscopy from January 2012 to January 2016 by a single fellowship-trained surgeon, including a 2-year follow-up. Patient demographics, comorbid medical conditions, and preoperative outcome scores were compared between patients with BHD (lateral center-edge angle 18° to 25°) who had revision hip arthroscopy to patients with BHD undergoing primary arthroscopy and patients without BHD (lateral center-edge angle >25°) undergoing revision arthroscopy. Cohorts were matched 2:1 by age and body mass index. Multivariate regressions were used to compare Hip Outcome Score, Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL) and Sports subscale (HOS-SS) scores and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) between the cohorts at 2-year follow-up. Binomial regression analysis was used to determine predictors of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). There was no statistical difference in age and BMI between the BHD revision (29.1 ± 8.8 years; 25.5 ± 3.58 kg/m2), BHD nonrevision (28.9 ± 8.5 years; 24.6 ± 3.1 kg/m2), and non-BHD revision (29.15 ± 8.6 years; 25.01 ± 3.2 kg/m2) cohorts. There were no statistically significant differences in 2-year clinical outcomes between BHD revision patients and either BHD primary or non-BHD revision patient groups, but BHD revision patients were significantly less likely to achieve PASS for HOS-SS compared with BHD primary and non-BHD revision groups (P = .047 and P = .031, respectively). Surgeons should exercise caution when indicating patients for revision hip arthroscopy with BHD. Although the current study lacks statistical power, the available data suggest that patients undergoing revision surgery with BHD may still experience clinical improvement but be less likely to achieve PASS metrics for several patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow up." @default.
• W2989932482 created "2019-12-05" @default.
• W2989932482 creator A5009001198 @default.
• W2989932482 creator A5009336062 @default.
• W2989932482 creator A5011060597 @default.
• W2989932482 creator A5014147462 @default.
• W2989932482 creator A5043697768 @default.
• W2989932482 creator A5056378102 @default.
• W2989932482 date "2019-12-01" @default.
• W2989932482 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2989932482 title "Functional and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia at 2-Year Follow-up" @default.
• W2989932482 cites W11818958 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W1965619156 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W1993823851 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W1994750242 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2033686823 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2045998346 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2080025563 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2099605143 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2116689404 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2121486771 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2146597386 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2261411602 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2276697827 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2441334539 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2519537507 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2533751658 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2607983323 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2609038325 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2625958356 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2741227339 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2838900861 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2891299038 @default.
• W2989932482 cites W2906639591 @default.
• W2989932482 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.06.019" @default.
• W2989932482 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31785751" @default.
• W2989932482 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2989932482 type Work @default.
• W2989932482 sameAs 2989932482 @default.
• W2989932482 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2989932482 countsByYear W29899324822019 @default.
• W2989932482 countsByYear W29899324822020 @default.
• W2989932482 countsByYear W29899324822021 @default.
• W2989932482 countsByYear W29899324822022 @default.
• W2989932482 countsByYear W29899324822023 @default.
• W2989932482 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2989932482 hasAuthorship W2989932482A5009001198 @default.
• W2989932482 hasAuthorship W2989932482A5009336062 @default.
• W2989932482 hasAuthorship W2989932482A5011060597 @default.
• W2989932482 hasAuthorship W2989932482A5014147462 @default.
• W2989932482 hasAuthorship W2989932482A5043697768 @default.
• W2989932482 hasAuthorship W2989932482A5056378102 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C2779571254 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C2779961238 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C2780485590 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C126322002 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C141071460 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C167135981 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C1862650 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C2779162959 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C2779571254 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C2779961238 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C2780221984 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C2780485590 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C36454342 @default.
• W2989932482 hasConceptScore W2989932482C71924100 @default.
• W2989932482 hasFunder F4320310604 @default.
• W2989932482 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2989932482 hasLocation W29899324821 @default.
• W2989932482 hasLocation W29899324822 @default.
• W2989932482 hasOpenAccess W2989932482 @default.
• W2989932482 hasPrimaryLocation W29899324821 @default.
• W2989932482 hasRelatedWork W2083400210 @default.
• W2989932482 hasRelatedWork W2326062201 @default.
• W2989932482 hasRelatedWork W2589025795 @default.
• W2989932482 hasRelatedWork W2593170515 @default.
• W2989932482 hasRelatedWork W2971983506 @default.
• W2989932482 hasRelatedWork W4206555429 @default.
• W2989932482 hasRelatedWork W4254212828 @default.
• W2989932482 hasRelatedWork W4283022728 @default.
• W2989932482 hasRelatedWork W4362577209 @default.
• W2989932482 hasRelatedWork W2023873679 @default.
• W2989932482 hasVolume "35" @default.
• W2989932482 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2989932482 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2989932482 magId "2989932482" @default.
• W2989932482 workType "article" @default.