FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2990216084> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2990216084 abstract "Abstract Background Multimode adhesives incorporate the versatility of adapting to various clinical situations by its capacity to be used in different protocols. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical behavior of composite resin direct restorations (Class I and II) performed with different universal dentin adhesive application protocols comparing adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria. Methods The current study is a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, and convenience sample controlled clinical trial. The participants (age ≥ 18 years) had restorative need of Class I and/or II due to the presence of carious lesions and/or unsatisfactory restorations in at least three dental elements. Each participant received three application protocols for Scotchbond Universal adhesive (3M ESPE), one in each tooth to be restored: ER = etch-and-rinse + adhesive (n = 50); SEE = selective enamel etch + adhesive (n = 50) and SE = self-etch adhesive (n = 50). All teeth were restored in a similar way using Filtek™ Supreme composite resin (3M ESPE). Restorations were evaluated using the adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria, at baseline after 7 to 21 (12.02 ± 5.68) days (T1; n = 50 per group) and after 12 to 20 (15.8 ± 2.7) months (T2; n = 46 per group) by two previously calibrated evaluators (Kappa > 0.80). The statistical tests were performed between groups (Friedman), intragroup (Wilcoxon), and between the criteria considering acceptable and not acceptable restorations (McNemar), α = 0.05. Results A statistically significant difference was observed only for the property “superficial staining”, between groups at T2 ( p = 0.01) for ER (n = 13 with score 2 or more) and SEE (n = 3 with score 2 or more) and intragroup for ER (T1, n = 1 with score 2 or more; T2, n = 13 with score 2 or more, p = 0.001) and SE (T1, n = 0 with score 2 or more; T2, n = 8 with score 2 or more p = 0.007). For the other comparisons between groups, intragroup, and between the adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria, there were no statistically significant differences ( p ≥ 0.05). Conclusions It can be concluded that the different application protocols of the universal adhesive resulted in clinically “acceptable” restorations after 15.8 ± 2.7 months of follow-up. Adapted FDI and adapted USPHS criteria provided similar results to each other. Trial registration. Number in Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC): RBR-9p3hdp. Registered 24 May 2015." @default.
• W2990216084 created "2019-12-05" @default.
• W2990216084 creator A5003940287 @default.
• W2990216084 creator A5020907768 @default.
• W2990216084 creator A5022943013 @default.
• W2990216084 creator A5048061317 @default.
• W2990216084 creator A5049868394 @default.
• W2990216084 creator A5067153495 @default.
• W2990216084 creator A5082159691 @default.
• W2990216084 creator A5085081601 @default.
• W2990216084 date "2019-11-21" @default.
• W2990216084 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2990216084 title "Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin – a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial" @default.
• W2990216084 cites W124459032 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W1731511450 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W1904294866 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W1986313232 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W1995271278 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2000945677 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2023711410 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2042298892 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2043881078 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2049826726 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2053626153 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2060519561 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2073955600 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2093353053 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2094193083 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2101410164 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2106866592 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2110079010 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2120595889 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2153708549 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2162881155 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2281235728 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2317058813 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2325305753 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2469420983 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2471269854 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2498231510 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2529642948 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2534599304 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2572114329 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2591255307 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2617172776 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2760516003 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2762214220 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2763129622 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2766374819 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2788001687 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2984458982 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W2990288872 @default.
• W2990216084 cites W48510117 @default.
• W2990216084 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0913-3" @default.
• W2990216084 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6868695" @default.
• W2990216084 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31752813" @default.
• W2990216084 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2990216084 type Work @default.
• W2990216084 sameAs 2990216084 @default.
• W2990216084 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2990216084 countsByYear W29902160842020 @default.
• W2990216084 countsByYear W29902160842021 @default.
• W2990216084 countsByYear W29902160842022 @default.
• W2990216084 countsByYear W29902160842023 @default.
• W2990216084 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2990216084 hasAuthorship W2990216084A5003940287 @default.
• W2990216084 hasAuthorship W2990216084A5020907768 @default.
• W2990216084 hasAuthorship W2990216084A5022943013 @default.
• W2990216084 hasAuthorship W2990216084A5048061317 @default.
• W2990216084 hasAuthorship W2990216084A5049868394 @default.
• W2990216084 hasAuthorship W2990216084A5067153495 @default.
• W2990216084 hasAuthorship W2990216084A5082159691 @default.
• W2990216084 hasAuthorship W2990216084A5085081601 @default.
• W2990216084 hasBestOaLocation W29902160841 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C156887251 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C186282968 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C2779263046 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C3019280483 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConceptScore W2990216084C104779481 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConceptScore W2990216084C105795698 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConceptScore W2990216084C141071460 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConceptScore W2990216084C142724271 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConceptScore W2990216084C156887251 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConceptScore W2990216084C159985019 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConceptScore W2990216084C168563851 @default.
• W2990216084 hasConceptScore W2990216084C186282968 @default.

• next