FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2991177620> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2991177620 endingPage "47" @default.
• W2991177620 startingPage "41" @default.
• W2991177620 abstract "Objectives It is unclear if sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with improved surgical outcomes compared with lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer. In this study we aimed to compare peri-operative surgical outcomes and treatment-related morbidity in patients who underwent robotic-assisted sentinel lymph node biopsy versus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy or hysterectomy alone for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer. Methods Records were reviewed of consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages I–III endometrial cancer undergoing robotic-assisted staging from January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2016. For the purpose of this analysis we focused on the actual patients who had sentinel node biopsy only (ie, excluding those who had an associated lymphadenectomy either for failed mapping or during the learning curve). We also excluded patients who had para-aortic lymph node dissection from the lymphadenectomy group. Perioperative and 30-day surgical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent sentinel lymph node assessment and those who had pelvic lymphadenectomy or hysterectomy alone, respectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting derived from propensity scores was used to minimize allocation bias in the comparison of outcomes between groups. Results A total of 621 patients were analyzed: 188 (30.3%) with sentinel lymph node biopsy, 198 (31.9%) with pelvic lymphadenectomy, and 235 (37.8%) with hysterectomy alone. Inverse probability of treatment weights analysis balanced for baseline characteristics (age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Charlson co-morbidity index, parity, prior cesarean section, and previous abdominal operation) showed no significant differences in intra-operative and post-operative complications, re-admissions, and re-operations between the groups. Compared with pelvic lymphadenectomy, the sentinel lymph node biopsy group had a shorter mean operative time (138.0 vs 222.8 min, p<0.001) and less median blood loss (50 vs 100 mL, p<0.001). Sentinel lymph node biopsy also was not associated with worse morbidity compared with hysterectomy alone. Conclusions Introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy reduces operative times and improves peri-operative surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted staging for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer without worsening the morbidity of hysterectomy alone." @default.
• W2991177620 created "2019-12-05" @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5007373031 @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5010282758 @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5040917714 @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5043789773 @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5052515933 @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5056742150 @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5056922746 @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5060735908 @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5075505395 @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5077315571 @default.
• W2991177620 creator A5090132919 @default.
• W2991177620 date "2019-11-27" @default.
• W2991177620 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2991177620 title "Sentinel lymph node biopsy for robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging: further improvement of perioperative outcomes" @default.
• W2991177620 cites W1969728666 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W1988964130 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2003788364 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2017148657 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2017954067 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2058900572 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2106560957 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2110818436 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2121690051 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2133735222 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2182443159 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2200250107 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2212274860 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2286949842 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2294263035 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2324377928 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2334862741 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2405934454 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2583455670 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2598954418 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2778695944 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2779229287 @default.
• W2991177620 cites W2785389296 @default.
• W2991177620 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-000672" @default.
• W2991177620 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31780567" @default.
• W2991177620 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2991177620 type Work @default.
• W2991177620 sameAs 2991177620 @default.
• W2991177620 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2991177620 countsByYear W29911776202020 @default.
• W2991177620 countsByYear W29911776202021 @default.
• W2991177620 countsByYear W29911776202022 @default.
• W2991177620 countsByYear W29911776202023 @default.
• W2991177620 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5007373031 @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5010282758 @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5040917714 @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5043789773 @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5052515933 @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5056742150 @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5056922746 @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5060735908 @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5075505395 @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5077315571 @default.
• W2991177620 hasAuthorship W2991177620A5090132919 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C179671157 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C2776606343 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C2777088508 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C2779494336 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C2780212769 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C2780824555 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C121608353 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C126322002 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C126838900 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C141071460 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C146357865 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C151730666 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C179671157 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C2775934546 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C2776606343 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C2777088508 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C2779494336 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C2780212769 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C2780824555 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C2780849966 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C31174226 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C530470458 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C61434518 @default.
• W2991177620 hasConceptScore W2991177620C71924100 @default.

• next