FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2991495712> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2991495712 abstract "Labyrinth gas seals (LSs) commonly used in turbomachines reduce secondary flow leakage. Conventional see-through labyrinth seal designs include either all teeth-on-stator (TOS) or all teeth-on-rotor (TOR). Experience shows that an interlocking labyrinth seal (ILS), with teeth on both stator and rotor, reduces gas leakage by up to 30% compared to the conventional see-through designs. However, field data for ILS rotordynamic characteristics are still vague and scarce in the literature. This work presents flow predictions for an ILS and a TOS LS, both seals share identical design features, namely radial clearance Cr = 0.2 mm, rotor diameter D = 150 mm, tooth pitch Li = 3.75 mm, and tooth height B = 3 mm. Air enters the seal at supply pressure Pin = 3.8, 6.9 bar (absolute) and temperature of 25 °C. The ratio of gas exit pressure to supply pressure ranges from 0.5 to 0.8, and the rotor speed is fixed at 10 krpm (surface speed of 79 m/s). The analysis implements a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method with a multi-frequency-orbit rotor whirl model. The CFD predicted mass flow rate for the ILS is ∼ 21% lower than that of the TOS LS, thus making the ILS a more efficient choice. Integration of the dynamic pressure fields in the seal cavities, obtained for excitation frequency (ω) ranging from 12% to 168% of rotor speed (sub and super synchronous whirl), allows an accurate estimation of the seal dynamic force coefficients. For all the considered operating conditions, at low frequency range, the TOS LS shows a negative direct stiffness (K < 0), frequency independent; whereas the ILS has K > 0 that increases with both frequency and supply pressure. For both seals, the magnitude of K decreases when the exit pressure/inlet pressure ratio increases. On the other hand, the cross-coupled stiffness (k) from both seals is frequency dependent, its magnitude increases with gas supply pressure, and k for the ILS is more sensitive to a change in the exit/inlet pressure ratio. Notably, k turns negative for subsynchronous frequencies below rotor speed (Ω) for both the TOS LS and the ILS. The direct damping (C) for the TOS LS remains constant for ω > ½ Ω and has a larger magnitude than the damping for the ILS over the frequency range up to 1.5 Ω. An increase in exit/inlet pressure ratio decreases the direct damping for both seals. The effective damping coefficient, Ceff = (C-k/ω), whenever positive aids to damp vibrations, whereas Ceff < 0 is a potential source for an instability. For frequencies ω/Ω < 1.3, Ceff for the TOS LS is higher in magnitude than that for the ILS. From a rotordynamics point of view, the ILS is not a sound selection albeit it reduces leakage. Comparison of the CFD predicted force coefficients against those from a bulk flow model demonstrates that the later simple model delivers poor results, often contradictory and largely indifferent to the type of seal, ILS or TOS LS. In addition, CFD model predictions are benchmarked against experimental dynamic force coefficients for two TOS LSs published by Ertas et al. (2012, “Rotordynamic Force Coefficients for Three Types of Annular Gas Seals With Inlet Preswirl and High Differential Pressure Ratio,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(4), pp. 04250301–04250312) and Vannini et al. (2014, “Labyrinth Seal and Pocket Damper Seal High Pressure Rotordynamic Test Data,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(2), pp. 022501–022509.)" @default.
• W2991495712 created "2019-12-05" @default.
• W2991495712 creator A5076706904 @default.
• W2991495712 creator A5088574273 @default.
• W2991495712 date "2018-10-29" @default.
• W2991495712 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2991495712 title "Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients for Two Labyrinth Gas Seals: Teeth-on-Stator and Interlocking Teeth Configurations. A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach to Their Performance" @default.
• W2991495712 cites W1980482169 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W2029779972 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W2032468700 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W2072326042 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W2078247854 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W2079422440 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W2083622383 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W2088916614 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W2161564881 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W2323639167 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W2888873969 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W3177223285 @default.
• W2991495712 cites W4242422693 @default.
• W2991495712 doi "https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041123" @default.
• W2991495712 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2991495712 type Work @default.
• W2991495712 sameAs 2991495712 @default.
• W2991495712 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2991495712 countsByYear W29914957122019 @default.
• W2991495712 countsByYear W29914957122020 @default.
• W2991495712 countsByYear W29914957122021 @default.
• W2991495712 countsByYear W29914957122022 @default.
• W2991495712 countsByYear W29914957122023 @default.
• W2991495712 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2991495712 hasAuthorship W2991495712A5076706904 @default.
• W2991495712 hasAuthorship W2991495712A5088574273 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C1633027 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C17281054 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C199723944 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C200398353 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C2776529397 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C2777042071 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C2777755289 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C2778449969 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C2780313912 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C121332964 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C127413603 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C139719470 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C142362112 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C153349607 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C162324750 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C1633027 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C17281054 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C192562407 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C199723944 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C200398353 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C2776529397 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C2777042071 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C2777755289 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C2778449969 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C2780313912 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C57879066 @default.
• W2991495712 hasConceptScore W2991495712C78519656 @default.
• W2991495712 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2991495712 hasLocation W29914957121 @default.
• W2991495712 hasOpenAccess W2991495712 @default.
• W2991495712 hasPrimaryLocation W29914957121 @default.
• W2991495712 hasRelatedWork W1487665211 @default.
• W2991495712 hasRelatedWork W1993561289 @default.
• W2991495712 hasRelatedWork W2236543810 @default.
• W2991495712 hasRelatedWork W2252934454 @default.
• W2991495712 hasRelatedWork W2370046005 @default.
• W2991495712 hasRelatedWork W2766960560 @default.
• W2991495712 hasRelatedWork W2911379278 @default.
• W2991495712 hasRelatedWork W754894402 @default.
• W2991495712 hasRelatedWork W78553886 @default.
• W2991495712 hasRelatedWork W180971792 @default.
• W2991495712 hasVolume "141" @default.
• W2991495712 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2991495712 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2991495712 magId "2991495712" @default.
• W2991495712 workType "article" @default.