FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2992108897> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2992108897 startingPage "93" @default.
• W2992108897 abstract "ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to understand faculty attitudes toward research and publishing and its role in and contributions to teaching effectiveness and student learning at non-doctoral granting AACSB-accredited business schools. A questionnaire was developed to assess faculty attitudes toward the research, teaching and the impact of research directly on teaching. The survey was sent to a random sample of business faculty at comprehensive AACSB accredited business schools. The results showed conflicting perspectives. While faculty perceived teaching and research to be mutually supportive and believed that their research activities made them better teachers, they also noted that they would spend less time in scholarly publication pursuits if it did not have such a strong impact on their job security. Faculty also acknowledged that securing a publication is often more important than providing a contribution to the advancement of business knowledge. Thus, while faculty say that research enhances the teaching and learning experience of students, they did not clearly demonstrate how they actually make this happen. INTRODUCTION Historically the role of publishing in the academy has been to provide a venue for academic discourse and the dissemination of newly created knowledge, a role that is as valid today as it was fifty or one hundred years ago. There is, however, a new paradigm emerging in business schools that is changing what should be the legitimate purpose and contribution of academic research. This shift is especially evident in schools which are currently accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) and in the process of seeking reaccreditation as well as candidacy schools seeking initial accreditation. The new standards adopted by AACSB in 2003, specifically AACSB Standards 10 and 2 (AACSB, 2003), which address defining faculty as academically qualified (AQ) and professionally qualified (PQ), have caused academic publishing to become even more highly prioritized. Under the new standards the most important component for business faculty achieving and/or maintaining AQ status is the number o/refereed journal publications. Although not specifically stated in the new AACSB standards, it is widely understood that the minimum requirements for a faculty member to maintain AQ status is that they have, at a minimum, two refereed journal publications within a five year period (Miles, Hazeldine & Munilla, 2004). The new standards have caused candidacy schools, seeking initial AACSB accreditation, and those in the reaccreditation process to require a higher percentage of their faculty to actively engage in research, and, more specifically, publish their research in peer reviewed journals. This increased emphasis on quantity of publications has the potential to shift the focus of research, to a degree greater than it has been, from what should be its primary contribution, the dissemination of new knowledge, to a focus on publishing purely for the sake of publishing. AN INCREASING EMPHASIS ON PUBLICATIONS Business schools at doctoral granting institutions have always placed a priority on their faculty publishing in high quality, peer reviewed academic journals. Business schools at balanced, non-doctoral schools have, in the past, focused primarily on teaching, with a balanced emphasis on research and service. But, today's business school faculties, even in balanced non-doctoral schools, are under greater pressure to produce publishable research in order to maintain their academic qualifications. This increasing emphasis on research and, particularly, research resulting in publications (Pettijohn, Udell & Parker, 1991), has been the focus of much discussion among business academicians. In Boyer's (1990) famous work Scholarship Revisited: Priorities of the Professorship, results were reported from a national 1989 Carnegie Foundation study that 45% of business faculty believed the number of publications is the primary indicator of research productivity. …" @default.
• W2992108897 created "2019-12-13" @default.
• W2992108897 creator A5062386913 @default.
• W2992108897 creator A5072688935 @default.
• W2992108897 date "2009-05-01" @default.
• W2992108897 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2992108897 title "Academic Publishing and Teaching Effectiveness: An Attitudinal Study of Aacsb Accredited Business School Faculty" @default.
• W2992108897 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2992108897 type Work @default.
• W2992108897 sameAs 2992108897 @default.
• W2992108897 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2992108897 countsByYear W29921088972012 @default.
• W2992108897 countsByYear W29921088972013 @default.
• W2992108897 countsByYear W29921088972014 @default.
• W2992108897 countsByYear W29921088972020 @default.
• W2992108897 countsByYear W29921088972021 @default.
• W2992108897 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2992108897 hasAuthorship W2992108897A5062386913 @default.
• W2992108897 hasAuthorship W2992108897A5072688935 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConcept C151719136 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConceptScore W2992108897C144024400 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConceptScore W2992108897C151719136 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConceptScore W2992108897C15744967 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConceptScore W2992108897C17744445 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConceptScore W2992108897C19417346 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConceptScore W2992108897C199539241 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConceptScore W2992108897C39549134 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConceptScore W2992108897C509550671 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConceptScore W2992108897C61521584 @default.
• W2992108897 hasConceptScore W2992108897C71924100 @default.
• W2992108897 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2992108897 hasLocation W29921088971 @default.
• W2992108897 hasOpenAccess W2992108897 @default.
• W2992108897 hasPrimaryLocation W29921088971 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W129272856 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W135785712 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W1518578641 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W1557765066 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W1701176523 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W1969324615 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W1987628173 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W2014555497 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W2031649958 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W2082827628 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W2119129627 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W2122700789 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W2133546019 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W2302088645 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W2302997349 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W2993308395 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W3196839381 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W341361933 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W817100724 @default.
• W2992108897 hasRelatedWork W174262059 @default.
• W2992108897 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2992108897 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2992108897 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2992108897 magId "2992108897" @default.
• W2992108897 workType "article" @default.