Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2992144846> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 64 of
64
with 100 items per page.
- W2992144846 startingPage "34" @default.
- W2992144846 abstract "[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] A decade ago, the banking industry was captivated by its prospects in the insurance brokerage business. And rightly so. Years of battling for the opportunity to sell insurance were finally paying dividends. To seize this opportunity, banks began aggressively buying insurance agencies. By 2000, banks were the most active acquirers in the market, completing 78 deals, or nearly 40% of all agency deals announced that year. Among those leading the way into the promised land of insurance sales were large banks including BB&T, Wells Fargo, First Tennessee, and Citizens Financial Group. Expectations soared. Today, however, the landscape has changed, and bank insurance momentum has slowed (Exhibit 1). The capital crisis that has gripped the banking industry over the past couple of years has made agency acquisitions difficult for some banks. However, the beginning of the slow-down pre-dates the full force of the credit crisis and can be traced to a sequence of setbacks that unfolded over the past half-decade. Soft prices sap momentum The first setback for bank-insurance began in 2004 as property and casualty insurance pricing began to soften. As softening prices slowed agency growth and suppressed investment returns, bank boards began to reassess their agency acquisition strategies. Enthusiasm for more deals waned. By 2005, the banking industry's share of the agency acquisition market had plummeted to 21.1% or roughly half its peak level reached three years earlier. The following year, as banks tried to mount a comeback in the agency acquisition market, they encountered a second setback. The competitive situation had changed. The public insurance brokers, needing to supplement their woeful organic growth in a persistent soft market, were highly-motivated buyers. In addition, private equity was on the hunt and willing to pay premium prices. With the increased aggression of these two segments, banks had lost the pricing advantage they previously held and were finding it more difficult to compete for deals. Many announced they would forego agency acquisitions until the return of a more favorable market. Insurance potential questioned The third setback began to emerge by late-2006 and was in full-bloom by 2007. During this time, banks, including several leaders of the bank-insurance movement, were questioning the results of their efforts in insurance. Although most acquired agencies were performing at least reasonably well, some had failed to contribute meaningfully to the overall performance of the bank. They were deemed ancillary, non-core, or nonessential. Ultimately, some banks divested, among them Bank of America, Union Bank of California, Capital One, and Webster Bank, all of which sold insurance agencies that were among the 100 largest in the U.S. Unlike the first two setbacks, which were driven largely by market cycles, this third setback hit at the core of bank-insurance, questioning the potential for insurance sales to make a relevant contribution to the banking industry. The 2008 American Bankers Insurance Association (ABIA) Study of Banks in Insurance found that, for 66.2% of surveyed banks, the primary objective for selling insurance is to increase income. This suggests that, in order to be relevant to the performance of the bank, an insurance agency must make a material contribution to the bank's income growth. Clearly, some banks were determining that, for them, this threshold was unattainable. Relevance is relative But what about other banks? Was this an indictment of bank-insurance generally or was it still possible for other banks to achieve the objective of meaningful income growth through insurance sales? The 2009 Michael White-Prudential Bank Insurance Fee Income Report sheds some light on these questions. Analyzing data from approximately 9,500 commercial banks and 1,000 bank holding companies, this report provides the percentage of income each of these BHCs derived from insurance brokerage fee income, a metric referred to as noninterest income (NII) concentration. …" @default.
- W2992144846 created "2019-12-13" @default.
- W2992144846 creator A5010276758 @default.
- W2992144846 date "2009-09-01" @default.
- W2992144846 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
- W2992144846 title "Next Round Will Go to the Small Banks: Changed Landscape Now Favors Community Banks to Pick Up the Slack in Agency Acquisitions" @default.
- W2992144846 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2992144846 type Work @default.
- W2992144846 sameAs 2992144846 @default.
- W2992144846 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2992144846 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2992144846 hasAuthorship W2992144846A5010276758 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C116168712 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C15241564 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C2778300220 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConcept C73283319 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C10138342 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C108170787 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C111472728 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C116168712 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C138885662 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C139719470 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C144133560 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C15241564 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C162324750 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C2778300220 @default.
- W2992144846 hasConceptScore W2992144846C73283319 @default.
- W2992144846 hasIssue "9" @default.
- W2992144846 hasLocation W29921448461 @default.
- W2992144846 hasOpenAccess W2992144846 @default.
- W2992144846 hasPrimaryLocation W29921448461 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W138133437 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W1533578400 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W174549775 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W1967211353 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W2151817233 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W2316931022 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W236312343 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W2483811824 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W248750800 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W2500332692 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W294017645 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W2994042864 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W3112014756 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W3124139200 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W314854608 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W321968382 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W38828398 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W75375694 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W2612214760 @default.
- W2992144846 hasRelatedWork W2992745686 @default.
- W2992144846 hasVolume "101" @default.
- W2992144846 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2992144846 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2992144846 magId "2992144846" @default.
- W2992144846 workType "article" @default.