FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2993790246> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2993790246 endingPage "81" @default.
• W2993790246 startingPage "61" @default.
• W2993790246 abstract "Introduction THE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT'S (LAPD) RAMPART SCANDAL OF THE LATE-1990s involved allegations of outrageous misconduct, led to overturning of over 100 criminal convictions and resulted firing or resignations of nearly 20 officers, several of whom were convicted of criminal charges (Burcham, 2001). The cost to city of Los Angeles has been estimated to be as high as one billion dollars (Pomerantz, 2000), (1) and LAPD is currently under federal oversight from Department of Justice (pbs.org, 2007). The Rampart Scandal raises serious questions about Los Angeles justice system at many levels. In light of recent allegations of brutality by LAPD, (2) it is important to understand what happened Rampart 1990s. Unfortunately, no entity has systematically investigated alleged misconduct at heart of Rampart Scandal (although Los Angeles District Attorney's office has investigated a few allegations). Instead, justice system investigators have analyzed LAPD organization an attempt to discover organizational problems that may have contributed to a context for misconduct. These efforts address only a few incidents and leave open questions about type, frequency, and causes of misconduct LAPD. In this vacuum of knowledge, LAPD developed a version of story suggesting that a very small group of Black and Hispanic officers were responsible for all of misconduct (LAPD, 2000). This familiar apples framing contradicted whistleblower Rafael Perez's (3) version of story, which described widespread misconduct. Perez claimed that a large number of officers were in loop, meaning they regularly planted evidence, manufactured probable cause, beat citizens, and generally abused citizens' due-process rights. Which version of story is correct? It is impossible to say because neither version can be confirmed with publicly available information. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that there are elements of truth both versions of story. It seems clear that something like a loop exists within LAPD, (4) and it is obvious that Rafael Perez, and at least a few of his officer friends, were apples. What are we to make of this explanatory stalemate? Considering LAPD's history of scandals, and failure of previous reforms to prevent misconduct, it might make sense to try to develop some ideas that go beyond apples or rotten barrel. My goal is to suggest critical lines of inquiry that have been ignored by official investigators and media commentators so far. Specifically, I hope to draw attention away from individualist or organizational approaches to LAPD's troubles, and toward an approach attending to justice system institution. Specifically, I propose two alternative causal factors: (1) ideological on crime, and (2) position of police criminal trials. These factors operate both within and outside police organization, and illuminate influence of racist and essentialist ideological discourse on patterns and practices of justice system organizations and individuals who constitute them. Police misconduct influenced by these factors cannot be addressed through organizational reforms unless those reforms reflect larger-scale changes discourses about justice system institution. One way to discover factors such as the war on crime and privileged police narratives is to look for their absence official analyses and media representations of scandal. This method seems counter-intuitive--looking for an absence-but if we theoretically contextualize roles and apparatuses that produce mainstream discourse on Rampart, we can see how ideology operates to foreground individual (and to a lesser extent, organizational) level analyses at expense of institutional-level analyses. This foregrounding is evident official and media representations that lay blame for Rampart on bad character of Rafael Perez and a few other Black and Hispanic officers. …" @default.
• W2993790246 created "2019-12-13" @default.
• W2993790246 creator A5026177863 @default.
• W2993790246 date "2009-03-22" @default.
• W2993790246 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2993790246 title "Looking Through the Gaps: A Critical Approach to the LAPD's Rampart Scandal" @default.
• W2993790246 cites W137704532 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W1499192892 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W1833233739 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W1973120249 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W1977044045 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W1991601844 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W1996064906 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2022778969 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2026537072 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2043796065 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2078924007 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2110659684 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2156074878 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W228401190 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2312460935 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2323786981 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2335261777 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2340151366 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2908190001 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2911935531 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W2969461210 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W3124423022 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W3125434951 @default.
• W2993790246 cites W589880749 @default.
• W2993790246 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2993790246 type Work @default.
• W2993790246 sameAs 2993790246 @default.
• W2993790246 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2993790246 countsByYear W29937902462012 @default.
• W2993790246 countsByYear W29937902462014 @default.
• W2993790246 countsByYear W29937902462015 @default.
• W2993790246 countsByYear W29937902462018 @default.
• W2993790246 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2993790246 hasAuthorship W2993790246A5026177863 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConcept C102587632 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConcept C2780077968 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConcept C2780587575 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConceptScore W2993790246C102587632 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConceptScore W2993790246C144024400 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConceptScore W2993790246C166957645 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConceptScore W2993790246C17744445 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConceptScore W2993790246C199539241 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConceptScore W2993790246C2779343474 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConceptScore W2993790246C2780077968 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConceptScore W2993790246C2780587575 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConceptScore W2993790246C73484699 @default.
• W2993790246 hasConceptScore W2993790246C95457728 @default.
• W2993790246 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2993790246 hasLocation W29937902461 @default.
• W2993790246 hasOpenAccess W2993790246 @default.
• W2993790246 hasPrimaryLocation W29937902461 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W1567313544 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W170473372 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W185937611 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W1977272248 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W2026204148 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W2070087094 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W2515799215 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W262687970 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W2979597491 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W2993841416 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W3123375110 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W3124036439 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W3125434951 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W3125603532 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W3160205794 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W3172448401 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W41641802 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W648687362 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W3122771649 @default.
• W2993790246 hasRelatedWork W3123969053 @default.
• W2993790246 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W2993790246 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2993790246 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2993790246 magId "2993790246" @default.
• W2993790246 workType "article" @default.