FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2993828578> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2993828578 endingPage "49" @default.
• W2993828578 startingPage "28" @default.
• W2993828578 abstract "Purpose Earlier studies on risk evaluation in private finance initiative and public private partnerships (PFI/PPP) projects have focussed more on quantitative approaches despite increasing call for contextual understanding of the bankability of risks. The purpose of this paper is to explore the perspectives of UK PFI financiers’ regarding the bankability of four critical risks (construction and completion risk, operations, supply and offtake risk) in PPP projects. Design/methodology/approach Multiple case study strategy was adopted to investigate the phenomenon within real-life context of PFI/PPP projects in UK. Using purposive sampling approach, the study examined school and road PFI/PPP projects through interviews, documentations and focus group discussions. Findings Results from the study unravelled 36 suitable bankability criteria and some mitigation strategies for evaluating the four critical risks in PFI/PPP during due diligence appraisal. Further evidences from the study also show that, financiers’ bankability criteria, when paired along with corresponding risks and mitigation strategies within with a single framework, provides a quick and effective view of bankability of risks in PFI/PPP funding application. Research limitations/implications In order to ensure generalisability of findings, only projects with similar nature were selected from just two sectors of the UK economy (road and education sectors). The context of the study is also based on UK’s PFI/PPP and Construction Industry, as such, other geographical regions in Europe and beyond have not been contextualised in this study. Due to the significance of finance in PFI/PPP contracts, only the perspective of project financiers have been explored in this study. Practical implications This study provides a less complicated but useful understanding of how risks in PFI/PPP projects may be packaged in a bankable manner to secure the confidence of project financiers. By presenting a qualitative framework, the study addresses concerns of over quantification of risk analysis in PFI/PPP appraisals and provides a relatable approach useful for non-finance oriented PPP practitioners. Social implications This study addresses the social concerns of too much complexity and ambiguity in PFI/PPP structuring especially regarding factors that could make a project acceptable to lenders. Originality/value The study proposes a “Bankability and Risk Qualitative Framework”, which presents bankability information on critical risks in clear manner and represents critical parameters for winning financiers’ funding approvals for PFI/PPP projects." @default.
• W2993828578 created "2019-12-13" @default.
• W2993828578 creator A5000013368 @default.
• W2993828578 creator A5028596761 @default.
• W2993828578 creator A5057468710 @default.
• W2993828578 creator A5062319500 @default.
• W2993828578 creator A5072085766 @default.
• W2993828578 creator A5079214421 @default.
• W2993828578 date "2019-11-28" @default.
• W2993828578 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2993828578 title "Risk mitigation in PFI/PPP project finance" @default.
• W2993828578 cites W1540981287 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W1967264510 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W1970616592 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W1980733033 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2001033289 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2016475149 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2020683474 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2029874288 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2040629268 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2061979451 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2064934795 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2076808989 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2076834327 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2128722040 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2169940028 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2176174964 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2184170249 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2294267536 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2505815323 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2563677482 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2584519874 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2901473657 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W3123887616 @default.
• W2993828578 cites W2329495614 @default.
• W2993828578 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-09-2018-0120" @default.
• W2993828578 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2993828578 type Work @default.
• W2993828578 sameAs 2993828578 @default.
• W2993828578 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2993828578 countsByYear W29938285782021 @default.
• W2993828578 countsByYear W29938285782022 @default.
• W2993828578 countsByYear W29938285782023 @default.
• W2993828578 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2993828578 hasAuthorship W2993828578A5000013368 @default.
• W2993828578 hasAuthorship W2993828578A5028596761 @default.
• W2993828578 hasAuthorship W2993828578A5057468710 @default.
• W2993828578 hasAuthorship W2993828578A5062319500 @default.
• W2993828578 hasAuthorship W2993828578A5072085766 @default.
• W2993828578 hasAuthorship W2993828578A5079214421 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C121426985 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C199915308 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C2780278329 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C2781016034 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C32896092 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C10138342 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C121426985 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C144133560 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C162324750 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C166957645 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C182306322 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C199915308 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C205649164 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C2779343474 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C2780278329 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C2781016034 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C32896092 @default.
• W2993828578 hasConceptScore W2993828578C50522688 @default.
• W2993828578 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2993828578 hasLocation W29938285781 @default.
• W2993828578 hasOpenAccess W2993828578 @default.
• W2993828578 hasPrimaryLocation W29938285781 @default.
• W2993828578 hasRelatedWork W1963672885 @default.
• W2993828578 hasRelatedWork W2037333661 @default.
• W2993828578 hasRelatedWork W2075413538 @default.
• W2993828578 hasRelatedWork W2117920756 @default.
• W2993828578 hasRelatedWork W2624162584 @default.
• W2993828578 hasRelatedWork W3156047631 @default.
• W2993828578 hasRelatedWork W614292829 @default.
• W2993828578 hasRelatedWork W642012464 @default.
• W2993828578 hasRelatedWork W658202097 @default.
• W2993828578 hasRelatedWork W2186146162 @default.
• W2993828578 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2993828578 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2993828578 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2993828578 magId "2993828578" @default.
• W2993828578 workType "article" @default.