FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2994179693> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2994179693 endingPage "39" @default.
• W2994179693 startingPage "30" @default.
• W2994179693 abstract "ONE WAY OF ASSURING PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOR IN DOCTORS IS TO ENSURE THAT ONLY THOSE STUDENTS WHO ARE LIKELY TO BEHAVE PROFESSIONALLY ARE ADMITTED TO MEDICAL SCHOOL. THE PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY IS TO EVALUATE THE USEFULNESS OF AN INSTRUMENT TO EVALUATE THE PROFESSIONAL BEARING OF APPLICANTS AT THE TIME OF THE MEDICAL SCHOOL INTERVIEW. Citing studies that suggest members of the public believe physicians as a group lack listening and communication skills and empathy, leaders in medical education have argued that medical schools have an obligation to graduate students with a specific set of professional skills, qualities, and behaviors (Cohen 2006; Stern, Frohna and Gruppen 2005). In response, a number of professional organizations across the continuum of medical education have worked diligently in recent years to define professionalism; enumerate professional standards and codes of conduct; and delineate behavioral markers indicative of professional behaviors in medical settings (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 2004; American Board of Internal Medicine 2001; Association of American Medical Colleges 2002, 2004; and National Board of Medical Examiners 2006). The Association of American Medical Colleges (aamc) published Learning Objectives for Medical Student Education, which outlines the attributes medical students should possess at graduation (aamc 1998). Two of the four attributes, altruistic and dutiful, focus on competencies and attitudes related to professionalism (e.g. , a commitment to advocacy, respect for patient privacy, and honesty and integrity in all interactions). Similarly, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (acgme) Outcome Project provides all residency programs with assessment tools for evaluating behaviors associated with professionalism, including compassion, respect for privacy, and sensitivity to diverse patient populations (acgme 2004). Furthermore, initiatives at medical schools are currently underway to ensure that the formal and experiential teaching of professionalism is enhanced and that ongoing assessments occur throughout the four years of medical school to ensure that students who graduate possess these qualities (Cohen 2006). Another strategy for ensuringprofessional behavior in doctors is to make certain that only those students who are likely to behave professionally are admitted to medical school (Cohen 2006; Stern et al. 2005). Most American medical schools interview candidates for admission as part of the selection process, the goal being to assess personal qualities and provide an indication of general fitness for practicing medicine. Applicants who meet academic and non-academic screening criteria stipulated by individual medical schools are invited for interviews. Interviewers rate and/or write comments in accordance with their impressions of candidates. Although the topics addressed and the specificity of information ascertained during interviews varies across institutions, most interviews are designed to gauge such attributes as motivation for medicine, commitment to serving others, and interpersonal skills (Elam, Studts and Johnson 1997). Despite widespread recognition that non-cognitive or personal qualities are important to a candidate's ability to become a competent professional, most admissions processes do not produce quantifiable and reliable data on personal qualities that predict future success as a physician. Stern and his colleagues found no consistent, significant correlations between any materials from the admissions packet and the measures of professionalism they tracked in the clinical years (Stern et al. 2005). Efforts to develop new admissions tools that could accurately identify candidates who possess the desired non-cognitive traits associated with professional behavior are under way. A multiple mini-interview (mmi) developed at McMaster University consists of ten stations designed to provide information about a prospective medical student's non-cognitive qualities. …" @default.
• W2994179693 created "2019-12-13" @default.
• W2994179693 creator A5021150966 @default.
• W2994179693 creator A5049433713 @default.
• W2994179693 creator A5058478353 @default.
• W2994179693 creator A5089445658 @default.
• W2994179693 date "2009-10-01" @default.
• W2994179693 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2994179693 title "Assessing Perceived Professionalism IN MEDICAL SCHOOL APPLICANTS" @default.
• W2994179693 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2994179693 type Work @default.
• W2994179693 sameAs 2994179693 @default.
• W2994179693 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2994179693 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2994179693 hasAuthorship W2994179693A5021150966 @default.
• W2994179693 hasAuthorship W2994179693A5049433713 @default.
• W2994179693 hasAuthorship W2994179693A5058478353 @default.
• W2994179693 hasAuthorship W2994179693A5089445658 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C2777293324 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C2778447849 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C2779529714 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C2779767262 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C120912362 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C15744967 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C17744445 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C199539241 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C2524010 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C2777293324 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C2778447849 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C2779529714 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C2779767262 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C33923547 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C509550671 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C61521584 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C71924100 @default.
• W2994179693 hasConceptScore W2994179693C77805123 @default.
• W2994179693 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2994179693 hasLocation W29941796931 @default.
• W2994179693 hasOpenAccess W2994179693 @default.
• W2994179693 hasPrimaryLocation W29941796931 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W1991315520 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2000822216 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2027097200 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2032354237 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2054768821 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2081006557 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2090918272 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2104345398 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2115373413 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2278523668 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2482401957 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2496103668 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2523394827 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2766101136 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2809702827 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2884209051 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W2990061560 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W3002667619 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W3032236760 @default.
• W2994179693 hasRelatedWork W623199418 @default.
• W2994179693 hasVolume "85" @default.
• W2994179693 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2994179693 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2994179693 magId "2994179693" @default.
• W2994179693 workType "article" @default.