Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2994188849> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 59 of
59
with 100 items per page.
- W2994188849 abstract "most urgent unmet national security threat to the United States today is the danger that weapons of mass destruction or weapons-usable materials in Russia could be stolen and sold to terrorists or hostile nations and used against American troops abroad or citizens at home. --Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, January 2001 Political and economic upheavals over the past decade have weakened the ability of Soviet successor states to monitor and control their potentially dangerous nuclear assets. A strong theoretical possibility exists--and has existed for some time--that nuclear material and even complete weapons could be removed from insecure stockpiles, trafficked abroad, and sold to virulently anti-Western states and groups. Several factors underscore the significance of this threat. One is the enormous quantity of former Soviet fissile material stored outside of weapons--some 600 to 650 tons scattered among 300 buildings at more than 50 nuclear facilities. (1) According to standard calculations, only six to eight kilograms of plutonium and 15 to 25 kilograms of highly-enriched uranium (HEU) are needed to make an implosion-type nuclear bomb; hence, even minor leakage episodes could provide the makings of a major proliferation catastrophe. (2) (The required amounts could be greater or less, depending on the design of the device and the engineering skills of the producer.) A second factor relates to reputedly lax physical security and accounting systems at many nuclear weapons enterprises. A third is the depressed economic situation of employees in parts of the nuclear complex, reflected in relatively low pay, a shrinking social safety net, and uncertain professional prospects. These factors are widely believed to constitute a pri me source of proliferation danger on the supply side. A fourth concern, frequently cited by US authorities, is that outside adversaries such as Iraq, Iran, and the al Qaeda organization have made efforts to acquire nuclear weapons or sufficient materials and expertise to make them. There seems little doubt that Russia's vast and troubled nuclear complex has been a target of such attempts, although adversaries also may have looked to other nuclear-armed states (such as Pakistan) to supply their weapons of mass destruction (WMD) requirements. Finally, existing US nuclear security programs have only modestly reduced the nuclear proliferation threat from Russia and other newly independent states (NIS). The basic US approach has been twofold: to contain the threat at the source with technological fixes and procedural norms--to build better fences around nuclear facilities in the words of a former Department of Energy (DOE) official familiar with the programs (3)-and to improve export control regimes, including NIS border defenses against nuclear smuggling. The new systems, though, still do not extend to many facilities, and adversaries with sufficient resources and the right connections could easily exploit the gaps in them. Also, insider corruption and economic hardship can erode the deterrent value of even the advanced safeguards being introduced, possibly paving the way for serious proliferation episodes. Additionally, the extraordinary length of Russia's border with neighboring countries, which runs some 12,000 miles, underscores the immense ch allenge of preventing clandestine exports of nuclear goods from that country. In surveying the condition of nuclear security in the new states, the question arises whether hostile states or groups already have acquired ingredients of nuclear weapons (or the weapons themselves) and from where and in what quantities. No clear answers are available, although there is much speculation. An international black market of sorts for radioactive substances developed in the aftermath of the Soviet collapse, but it provides few clues. Confirmed smuggling cases involving weapons-usable material are few and far between, and traffickers in these instances have had no obvious links to customers. …" @default.
- W2994188849 created "2019-12-13" @default.
- W2994188849 creator A5048832372 @default.
- W2994188849 date "2003-03-01" @default.
- W2994188849 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2994188849 title "Nuclear Smuggling: Patterns and Responses" @default.
- W2994188849 cites W2029392120 @default.
- W2994188849 cites W2075757789 @default.
- W2994188849 cites W2094486390 @default.
- W2994188849 cites W587052042 @default.
- W2994188849 doi "https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2133" @default.
- W2994188849 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
- W2994188849 type Work @default.
- W2994188849 sameAs 2994188849 @default.
- W2994188849 citedByCount "5" @default.
- W2994188849 countsByYear W29941888492014 @default.
- W2994188849 countsByYear W29941888492015 @default.
- W2994188849 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2994188849 hasAuthorship W2994188849A5048832372 @default.
- W2994188849 hasBestOaLocation W29941888491 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConcept C194110935 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConcept C511782119 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConceptScore W2994188849C144133560 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConceptScore W2994188849C155202549 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConceptScore W2994188849C15744967 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConceptScore W2994188849C17744445 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConceptScore W2994188849C194110935 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConceptScore W2994188849C199539241 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConceptScore W2994188849C38652104 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConceptScore W2994188849C41008148 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConceptScore W2994188849C511782119 @default.
- W2994188849 hasConceptScore W2994188849C73484699 @default.
- W2994188849 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2994188849 hasLocation W29941888491 @default.
- W2994188849 hasOpenAccess W2994188849 @default.
- W2994188849 hasPrimaryLocation W29941888491 @default.
- W2994188849 hasRelatedWork W2016717044 @default.
- W2994188849 hasRelatedWork W2035068063 @default.
- W2994188849 hasRelatedWork W2235404951 @default.
- W2994188849 hasRelatedWork W2291007448 @default.
- W2994188849 hasRelatedWork W2996119649 @default.
- W2994188849 hasRelatedWork W3217479610 @default.
- W2994188849 hasRelatedWork W4312356060 @default.
- W2994188849 hasRelatedWork W561178569 @default.
- W2994188849 hasRelatedWork W594374491 @default.
- W2994188849 hasRelatedWork W818629777 @default.
- W2994188849 hasVolume "33" @default.
- W2994188849 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2994188849 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2994188849 magId "2994188849" @default.
- W2994188849 workType "article" @default.