FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2995051312> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2995051312 abstract "Background: Equitable health care utilization is a pillar of the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and is also a concern to policymakers. Measuring and quantifying the inequalities are essential in assessing the progress toward achieving the UHC goals. Several studies have focused on overall measures of unfair inequality in health care utilization. The overall approaches to outpatient and inpatient services are not representative of the differences in health care usage in public and private sectors in a mixed healthcare system, like Iran. A few studies have assessed inequality measures for general practitioners (GPs), specialists (SPs), and hospital admission services in different sectors, separately. Objectives: This study aimed at measuring health care utilization inequalities in outpatient and inpatient health services in public and private sectors in Iran. Methods: In this study, national representative data derived from the utilization of health services survey (UHSS) in 2014 was used. The concentration curve (CC) and concentration index (CI) were applied to assess inequalities in health care utilization services, including the number of GP visits, SP visits, and admission in hospitals. We used ADePT software to produce a nonlinear estimation of CI for these count variables. The indirect standardization method was used to standardize the services for differences in needs by age and gender. The inequality in health care utilization was examined in both public and private sectors, separately. Results: Based on the results, public and private outpatient settings, except for the private GP visits, followed a pro-poor pattern. Inpatient admission in the public sector had a pro-poor model, but it showed a pro-rich pattern in the private sector. GP visits in the private sector changed in favor of the poorer people and SP visits in the public sector changed toward a pro-rich pattern after standardization for differences in needs. CI for family physician (FP) and GP visits in public and private sectors, and also SP visits in public and private sectors was -0.089, -0.086, -0.010, 0.025, and -0.018, respectively. CI for the inpatient admission in public and private sectors was -0.126 and 0.157, respectively. GP, SP and hospital services utilization showed a pro-poor pattern. Conclusions: The results of this study showed that most of the health care utilization followed a pro-poor model in the mixed health care system in Iran. SP visits in the public sector changed toward a pro-rich pattern after standardization for differences in needs. Although public outpatient services need more attention to maintain their pro-poor distribution, SP visits in the public sector should be more considered to follow a pro-poor pattern. Health policymakers are recommended to take measures to eliminate barriers to access this service. This may lead to reduce a gap between the poor and rich people in the utilization of the health care and moving toward the UHC." @default.
• W2995051312 created "2019-12-26" @default.
• W2995051312 creator A5055161132 @default.
• W2995051312 creator A5076447502 @default.
• W2995051312 creator A5077912057 @default.
• W2995051312 creator A5087651038 @default.
• W2995051312 date "2019-12-23" @default.
• W2995051312 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2995051312 title "Health Care Utilization Inequality in a Mixed Public-Private Health Care System: An Insight from the National Survey in Iran" @default.
• W2995051312 cites W1502374245 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W1536723723 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W1821851163 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W1914308209 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W1996562077 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2008005040 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2014555154 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2025774238 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2028686211 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2031082849 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2039964043 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2040746697 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2068303969 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2081357971 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2098542590 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2100849808 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2109106445 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2110159983 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2111406334 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2115884548 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2122747785 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2145544940 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2150516580 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2167612461 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2474683400 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2560813992 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2596224953 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2613626736 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2737023652 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2808365149 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W2904707171 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W3122664795 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W3124840394 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W4235321056 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W4244527176 @default.
• W2995051312 cites W642247913 @default.
• W2995051312 doi "https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope.88589" @default.
• W2995051312 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2995051312 type Work @default.
• W2995051312 sameAs 2995051312 @default.
• W2995051312 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2995051312 countsByYear W29950513122021 @default.
• W2995051312 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2995051312 hasAuthorship W2995051312A5055161132 @default.
• W2995051312 hasAuthorship W2995051312A5076447502 @default.
• W2995051312 hasAuthorship W2995051312A5077912057 @default.
• W2995051312 hasAuthorship W2995051312A5087651038 @default.
• W2995051312 hasBestOaLocation W29950513121 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C121426985 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C136264566 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C147859227 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C2775909303 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C45555294 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C121426985 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C134306372 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C136264566 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C138816342 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C147859227 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C159110408 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C160735492 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C162324750 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C2775909303 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C33923547 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C45555294 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C50522688 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C71924100 @default.
• W2995051312 hasConceptScore W2995051312C99454951 @default.
• W2995051312 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2995051312 hasLocation W29950513121 @default.
• W2995051312 hasOpenAccess W2995051312 @default.
• W2995051312 hasPrimaryLocation W29950513121 @default.
• W2995051312 hasRelatedWork W2020749531 @default.
• W2995051312 hasRelatedWork W2026194140 @default.
• W2995051312 hasRelatedWork W2163515204 @default.
• W2995051312 hasRelatedWork W2490307366 @default.
• W2995051312 hasRelatedWork W2607337690 @default.
• W2995051312 hasRelatedWork W2913437656 @default.
• W2995051312 hasRelatedWork W3013387282 @default.
• W2995051312 hasRelatedWork W4283314095 @default.
• W2995051312 hasRelatedWork W4386123937 @default.
• W2995051312 hasRelatedWork W2609483649 @default.
• W2995051312 hasVolume "9" @default.

• next