Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2995603611> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W2995603611 endingPage "S772" @default.
- W2995603611 startingPage "S772" @default.
- W2995603611 abstract "To describe the impact of hypotheses and parameters in national institute for health and care excellence (NICE) and the health economic and public health commission (CEESP) of the french health autority (HAS) appraisals, on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of six pharmaceutical products with a total of seven treatment indications with published cost-effectiveness analyses from both NICE and CEESP. In order to measure the impact of choices made by NICE and the CEESP on ICERs, we compared first final NICE and CEESP’s appraisals for seven indications with a focus on: methodology of analysis, time horizon, discount rates, extrapolation of clinical efficacy, sources of utility, adverse events. The analysis of the models revealed differences in the seven evaluations submitted to NICE and the CEESP. Some of these differences have an impact easy to interpret: longer time horizons and a slightly lower discount rate (3.5% vs 4.0%) were adopted in NICE submissions which individually tend to lower ICERs. Other differences regarding methodological choices are more difficult to handle when it comes to compare the ICERs, especially in the choice of comparators in five evaluations, survival extrapolation in four evaluations, model structure (semi-Markov vs partitioned survival) in two evaluations, population in two evaluations and method of estimation of adverse event in two evaluations. In order to evaluate the feasibility of comparing methodological choices used in NICE and CEESP appraisals, it is important to adapt the models to quantify the impact on ICERs. Finally, the differences regarding parameters and methodological choices used in the seven evaluations by NICE and CEESP submission showed that NICE’s choices were more favorable regarding the ICER 6 times out of 7." @default.
- W2995603611 created "2019-12-26" @default.
- W2995603611 creator A5002060713 @default.
- W2995603611 creator A5003366768 @default.
- W2995603611 creator A5025098520 @default.
- W2995603611 creator A5091439412 @default.
- W2995603611 date "2019-11-01" @default.
- W2995603611 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2995603611 title "PNS60 CAN WE APPLY NICE COST-EFFECTIVENESS TO FRENCH EFFICIENCY OPTIONS: A COMPARISON OF SEVEN NICE AND HAS BASECASE COST-EFFECTIVENESS SCENARIOS" @default.
- W2995603611 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.09.1962" @default.
- W2995603611 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2995603611 type Work @default.
- W2995603611 sameAs 2995603611 @default.
- W2995603611 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2995603611 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2995603611 hasAuthorship W2995603611A5002060713 @default.
- W2995603611 hasAuthorship W2995603611A5003366768 @default.
- W2995603611 hasAuthorship W2995603611A5025098520 @default.
- W2995603611 hasAuthorship W2995603611A5091439412 @default.
- W2995603611 hasBestOaLocation W29956036111 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C2777352838 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C2779256446 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C28761237 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C10138342 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C105795698 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C112930515 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C149782125 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C162118730 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C162324750 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C17744445 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C199360897 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C199539241 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C2777352838 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C2779256446 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C28761237 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C3019080777 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C33923547 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C41008148 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C42475967 @default.
- W2995603611 hasConceptScore W2995603611C71924100 @default.
- W2995603611 hasLocation W29956036111 @default.
- W2995603611 hasOpenAccess W2995603611 @default.
- W2995603611 hasPrimaryLocation W29956036111 @default.
- W2995603611 hasRelatedWork W1860207377 @default.
- W2995603611 hasRelatedWork W2025373866 @default.
- W2995603611 hasRelatedWork W2113863882 @default.
- W2995603611 hasRelatedWork W2129750793 @default.
- W2995603611 hasRelatedWork W2225428663 @default.
- W2995603611 hasRelatedWork W2510133446 @default.
- W2995603611 hasRelatedWork W3122491543 @default.
- W2995603611 hasRelatedWork W4206658108 @default.
- W2995603611 hasRelatedWork W48400510 @default.
- W2995603611 hasRelatedWork W57418721 @default.
- W2995603611 hasVolume "22" @default.
- W2995603611 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2995603611 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2995603611 magId "2995603611" @default.
- W2995603611 workType "article" @default.