FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2996126302> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2996126302 startingPage "2317" @default.
• W2996126302 abstract "This is an essay on Professor Sarah A. Seo’s new book, Policing the Open Road: How Cars Transformed American Freedom (Harvard Univ. Press 2019). I focus on Professor Seo’s analysis of Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925) and Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949). Carroll is important not only because it was the Court’s first car case. Understanding Carroll (and Brinegar, which solidified and expanded Carroll’s holding) is essential because, nearly one hundred years later, its logic continues to direct how the modern Court resolves Fourth Amendment claims of motorists. Put simply, a majority of today’s Justices view the Fourth Amendment rights of motorists essentially the same way that a majority of the Justices did in 1925. Specifically, Part I highlights Seo’s major assertions regarding Carroll; Carroll’s influence on another controversial search and seizure decision, Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), which upheld an officer’s power to stop and frisk a person he suspects is armed and dangerous; and finally, Carroll’s connection to the police authority upheld by the Justices that permits the discretionary and discriminatory policing that currently pervades America’s highways and roads.Part II of this essay focuses on the modern Court’s understanding of motorists’ privacy. Carroll’s vision of how the Fourth Amendment applies to searching cars was not inescapable. While many lawyers and law students today might not believe it, not so long ago several members of the Burger Court took the view that cars should be treated like other effects under the Fourth Amendment – which meant the warrant requirement would apply to cars. Though a majority of Justices never embraced the view that warrants are required to search the interior of vehicles, in a series of cases the Court went back and forth on whether warrants were needed to search private containers found in vehicles. Part II examines these cases and the Court’s flawed norm that motorists have diminished privacy interests in closed containers found in cars when police have probable cause to search. One could view these cases as adopting a narrower view of motorists’ privacy rights than the view embraced by Carroll. More importantly, the understanding that currently permits warrantless searches of suitcases and purses under the automobile exception, if meant to be a neutral principle, would also allow warrantless searches of computers and cell phones found in cars. I examine whether today’s Court will apply the automobile exception to searches of computers, cell phones and other electronic devices found in vehicles." @default.
• W2996126302 created "2019-12-26" @default.
• W2996126302 creator A5023555747 @default.
• W2996126302 date "2019-12-01" @default.
• W2996126302 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2996126302 title "Cops and Cars: How the Automobile Drove Fourth Amendment Law" @default.
• W2996126302 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2996126302 type Work @default.
• W2996126302 sameAs 2996126302 @default.
• W2996126302 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2996126302 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2996126302 hasAuthorship W2996126302A5023555747 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C2777189325 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C2779404633 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C61547137 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConcept C69775031 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C121332964 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C144024400 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C163258240 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C17744445 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C199539241 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C2777189325 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C2778272461 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C2779404633 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C61547137 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C62520636 @default.
• W2996126302 hasConceptScore W2996126302C69775031 @default.
• W2996126302 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2996126302 hasLocation W29961263021 @default.
• W2996126302 hasOpenAccess W2996126302 @default.
• W2996126302 hasPrimaryLocation W29961263021 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W1489446833 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W1517829001 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W1558711796 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W1569377503 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W1587798983 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W2102370022 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W2202151078 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W2240556009 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W2337179776 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W248210944 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W2731257159 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W2766961348 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W2990089162 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W3122446781 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W3126142969 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W3166502010 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W3201271025 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W574263705 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W75917398 @default.
• W2996126302 hasRelatedWork W3156237156 @default.
• W2996126302 hasVolume "99" @default.
• W2996126302 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2996126302 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2996126302 magId "2996126302" @default.
• W2996126302 workType "article" @default.