FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2996157445> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2996157445 endingPage "344" @default.
• W2996157445 startingPage "337" @default.
• W2996157445 abstract "Objective: Beliefs about marijuana use and prevalence of use may be associated with the legalization status of the state of residence. We examined differences in views and rates of use of marijuana among residents in recreationally legal, medically legal, and nonlegal states. Methods: We surveyed a nationally representative online panel of US adults (N = 16,280) and stratified results by marijuana legalization status of states. We compared views of residents of recreational states on benefits and risks of marijuana use to residents in other states. Results: The response rate was 56.3% (n = 9003). Residents in recreationally legal states were more likely to believe marijuana could be beneficial for pain management (73% in recreationally legal states, 67% in medically legal states, 63% in nonlegal states; P value: <0.0001), provide relief from stress, anxiety or depression (52% in recreationally legal states, 47% in medically legal states, 46% in nonlegal states; P value: 0.01), and improve appetite (39% in recreationally legal states, 36% in medically legal states, 33% in nonlegal states; P value: <0.009). In addition, residents in recreational states were significantly more likely to believe that smoking 1 marijuana joint a day is somewhat or much safer than smoking 1 cigarette a day (40.8% in recreationally legal states, 39.1% in medically legal states, and 36.1% in nonlegal states; P value: <0.0001). Residents of recreationally and medically legal states were more likely to believe second-hand marijuana smoke was somewhat or much safer than second-hand tobacco smoke (38.3% in recreationally legal states, 38.3% in medically legal states, and 35.7% in nonlegal states; P value: 0.003). Past-year marijuana use in any form (20% in recreational, 14.1% in medical, 12% in nonlegal) and past-year marijuana use of multiple forms (11.1% in recreational, 6.1% in medical, 4.9% in nonlegal) were highest among residents of recreationally legal states. Overall, prevalence of past-year use of any form of marijuana use was more common among residents of recreationally legal states compared with other states (20.3%, confidence interval [CI] 19.5, 21.1 in recreationally legal states; 15.4%, CI 14.7, 16.2 in medically legal states; 11.9%, CI 11.2, 12.6 in nonlegal states). Conclusions: Residents in recreationally legal states were most likely to believe marijuana has benefits, marijuana smoke is safer than tobacco smoke, and have the highest rate of marijuana use. This is cause for concern, given the tide of commercialization, growing number of high-potency cannabis products, and favorable media coverage promoting use for health problems." @default.
• W2996157445 created "2019-12-26" @default.
• W2996157445 creator A5005685979 @default.
• W2996157445 creator A5006572902 @default.
• W2996157445 creator A5044388295 @default.
• W2996157445 creator A5052218106 @default.
• W2996157445 creator A5078795152 @default.
• W2996157445 creator A5090402848 @default.
• W2996157445 date "2019-12-05" @default.
• W2996157445 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2996157445 title "Differences in Opinions About Marijuana Use and Prevalence of Use by State Legalization Status" @default.
• W2996157445 cites W1792768669 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W1972792004 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W1975505844 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W1983041486 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W1990652670 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2024355140 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2029481912 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2035460411 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2059479064 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2078661149 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2086165636 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2089642104 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2120188368 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2120227293 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2502101185 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2511391204 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2516268678 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2530593439 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2566803638 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2584858661 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2598525226 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2608549703 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2736295906 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2747833740 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2751670357 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2770258982 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2770927069 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2793589705 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2803326096 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2805521926 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2811304654 @default.
• W2996157445 cites W2884057222 @default.
• W2996157445 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/adm.0000000000000593" @default.
• W2996157445 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7269858" @default.
• W2996157445 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31821192" @default.
• W2996157445 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2996157445 type Work @default.
• W2996157445 sameAs 2996157445 @default.
• W2996157445 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2996157445 countsByYear W29961574452020 @default.
• W2996157445 countsByYear W29961574452021 @default.
• W2996157445 countsByYear W29961574452022 @default.
• W2996157445 countsByYear W29961574452023 @default.
• W2996157445 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2996157445 hasAuthorship W2996157445A5005685979 @default.
• W2996157445 hasAuthorship W2996157445A5006572902 @default.
• W2996157445 hasAuthorship W2996157445A5044388295 @default.
• W2996157445 hasAuthorship W2996157445A5052218106 @default.
• W2996157445 hasAuthorship W2996157445A5078795152 @default.
• W2996157445 hasAuthorship W2996157445A5090402848 @default.
• W2996157445 hasBestOaLocation W29961574452 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C110269972 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C2778506969 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C110269972 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C118552586 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C119857082 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C144024400 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C149923435 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C17744445 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C199539241 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C2776291640 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C2778506969 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C41008148 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C71924100 @default.
• W2996157445 hasConceptScore W2996157445C99454951 @default.
• W2996157445 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2996157445 hasLocation W29961574451 @default.
• W2996157445 hasLocation W29961574452 @default.
• W2996157445 hasLocation W29961574453 @default.
• W2996157445 hasOpenAccess W2996157445 @default.
• W2996157445 hasPrimaryLocation W29961574451 @default.
• W2996157445 hasRelatedWork W181044676 @default.
• W2996157445 hasRelatedWork W2054026560 @default.
• W2996157445 hasRelatedWork W2063469718 @default.
• W2996157445 hasRelatedWork W2323493410 @default.
• W2996157445 hasRelatedWork W2360444414 @default.
• W2996157445 hasRelatedWork W2376987616 @default.

• next