FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2996558341> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2996558341 endingPage "14" @default.
• W2996558341 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2996558341 abstract "The ideas of Lee Shulman have played a major role in reconceptualising pedagogical description. In 2005, Shulman described a construct called “signature pedagogies” in order to describe recognisable and distinctive pedagogies used to prepare future practitioners for their profession. As a broader application of Shulman’s ideas, this paper asks, what is the efficacy of describing pedagogies that have become entrenched in secondary school subjects as signature pedagogies? Approached from a cultural perspective these questions are examined by comparing the subject cultures of junior school maths and science as experienced by, and represented in the classrooms of, a small number of teachers from two secondary schools in Victoria, Australia. In this research, subject culture is underpinned by shared basic assumptions that govern the dominance of certain “subject paradigms” (what should be taught) and “subject pedagogies” (how this should be taught) (Ball & Lacey, 1980). In this secondary school setting, the term signature pedagogies can be equated to the term subject pedagogies on the basis that both aim to characterise practice across the subject, or discipline, based on what was perceived as central to the task of teaching and learning. The paper draws on classroom observation and teacher interview data to show how six teachers positioned two aspects of their teaching in relation to what they believed was central in shaping their maths and science teaching: the effect of the arrangement of curriculum content on teachers’ conceptualisations of the teaching task; and a pedagogical imperative to engage students through activity-based learning experiences. The cultural expectations surrounding these two aspects of teaching appear to have a strong influence on practice, and in some senses teachers’ pedagogical responses were clear. These common responses are what I am calling “subject pedagogies” (see Ball & Lacey, 1980) because there was general agreement about what was central to the teaching task. Two subject pedagogies were seen to represent strong discourses occurring in both subjects: a “Pedagogy of Support” in maths, and “Pedagogy of Engagement” in science. Their established and shared character resembled Shulman’s posited “signature pedagogies” (Shulman, 2005). The data shows that by evaluating cultural practices that teachers have in common, and assumptions underpinning these, there is potential for highlighting imbalances, strengths and weaknesses, and connections and disconnections, associated with prevailing subject pedagogies." @default.
• W2996558341 created "2019-12-26" @default.
• W2996558341 creator A5065385665 @default.
• W2996558341 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2996558341 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2996558341 title "Characterising secondary school teacher imperatives as subject (signature) pedagogies : a pedagogy of support in maths and a pedagogy of engagement in science" @default.
• W2996558341 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2996558341 type Work @default.
• W2996558341 sameAs 2996558341 @default.
• W2996558341 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2996558341 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2996558341 hasAuthorship W2996558341A5065385665 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConcept C2780801425 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConceptScore W2996558341C144024400 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConceptScore W2996558341C145420912 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConceptScore W2996558341C15744967 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConceptScore W2996558341C161191863 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConceptScore W2996558341C19417346 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConceptScore W2996558341C199360897 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConceptScore W2996558341C2777855551 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConceptScore W2996558341C2780801425 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConceptScore W2996558341C41008148 @default.
• W2996558341 hasConceptScore W2996558341C47177190 @default.
• W2996558341 hasLocation W29965583411 @default.
• W2996558341 hasOpenAccess W2996558341 @default.
• W2996558341 hasPrimaryLocation W29965583411 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W130309962 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W1487325414 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W1506182758 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W1523157085 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W1568973969 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W1575124907 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W1963727953 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W2188829939 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W2481649864 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W2503836155 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W2604862506 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W2676433 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W287478042 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W2917734851 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W2987338102 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W2990763561 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W3030200875 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W3034753924 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W631946486 @default.
• W2996558341 hasRelatedWork W643292930 @default.
• W2996558341 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2996558341 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2996558341 magId "2996558341" @default.
• W2996558341 workType "article" @default.