FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2996867922> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2996867922 endingPage "1363" @default.
• W2996867922 startingPage "1357" @default.
• W2996867922 abstract "Purpose To present an analytical formalism for the in depth assessment of uncertainties of field output factors in small fields related to detector positioning based on dose profile measurements. Additionally, a procedure for the propagation of these uncertainties was developed. Methods Based on the assumption that one dimensional and two dimensional second‐order polynomial functions can be fitted to dose profiles of small photon beams, equations for the calculation of the expectation value, the variance, and the standard deviation were developed. The following fitting procedures of the dose profiles were considered: A one‐dimensional case (1D), a quasi two‐dimensional case (2Dq) based on independently measured line profiles and a full 2D case (2Df) which also considers cross‐correlations in a two‐dimensional dose distribution. A rectangular and a Gaussian probability density function (PDF) characterizing the probability of possible positions of the detector relative to the maximum dose were used. Uncertainty components such as the finite resolution of the scanning water phantom, the reproducibility of the determination of the position of the maximum dose, and the reproducibility of the collimator system were investigated. This formalism was tested in a 0.5 x 0.5 cm 2 photon field where dose profiles were measured using a radiochromic film, a synthetic diamond detector, and an unshielded diode detector. Additionally, the dose distribution measured with the radiochromic film was convoluted with a convolution kernel mimicking the active volume of the unshielded diode. Results Analytic expressions for the calculation of uncertainties on field output factors were found for the 1D, the 2Dq, and the 2Df case. The uncertainty of the field output factor related to the relative position of the detector to the maximum dose increased quadratically with increasing limits of possible detector positions. Analysis of the radiochromic film showed that the 2Dq case gave a more conservative assessment of the uncertainty compared to the 2Df case with a difference of < 0.1%. The 2Dq case applied to the film measurements agreed well with the same approach as was applied to the unshielded diode. The investigated uncertainty components propagated to an uncertainty of the field output factors of 0.5% and 0.4% for the synthetic diamond and the unshielded diode, respectively. Additionally, the expectation value was lower than the maximum dose. The difference was 0.4% and 0.3% for the synthetic diamond and the unshielded diode, respectively. Conclusions The assessment of uncertainties of field output factors related to detector positioning is feasible using the proposed formalism. The 2Dq case is applicable when using online detectors. Accurate positioning in small fields is essential for accurate dosimetry as its related uncertainty increases quadratically. The observed drop of the expectation value needs to be considered in small field dosimetry." @default.
• W2996867922 created "2020-01-10" @default.
• W2996867922 creator A5021925904 @default.
• W2996867922 creator A5038714785 @default.
• W2996867922 creator A5046061409 @default.
• W2996867922 date "2020-01-26" @default.
• W2996867922 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2996867922 title "An analytical formalism for the assessment of dose uncertainties due to positioning uncertainties" @default.
• W2996867922 cites W1984715102 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W198774002 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2005679681 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2008673865 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2015851130 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2023072501 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2036963924 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2053258806 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2056534516 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2076286518 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2080167962 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2083833419 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2091280191 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2091639981 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2093368734 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2100238329 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2137826556 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2167580286 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2232269490 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2440754136 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2793432989 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2893008696 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W2985709812 @default.
• W2996867922 cites W3124917383 @default.
• W2996867922 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13991" @default.
• W2996867922 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7078844" @default.
• W2996867922 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31880323" @default.
• W2996867922 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2996867922 type Work @default.
• W2996867922 sameAs 2996867922 @default.
• W2996867922 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2996867922 countsByYear W29968679222021 @default.
• W2996867922 countsByYear W29968679222022 @default.
• W2996867922 countsByYear W29968679222023 @default.
• W2996867922 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2996867922 hasAuthorship W2996867922A5021925904 @default.
• W2996867922 hasAuthorship W2996867922A5038714785 @default.
• W2996867922 hasAuthorship W2996867922A5046061409 @default.
• W2996867922 hasBestOaLocation W29968679221 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C159317903 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C163716315 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C197055811 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C22679943 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C2779200277 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C30475298 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C7218915 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C94915269 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C104293457 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C105795698 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C120665830 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C121332964 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C159317903 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C163716315 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C197055811 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C22679943 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C2779200277 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C2989005 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C30475298 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C33923547 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C62520636 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C71924100 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C7218915 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C75088862 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C94915269 @default.
• W2996867922 hasConceptScore W2996867922C9893847 @default.
• W2996867922 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2996867922 hasLocation W29968679221 @default.
• W2996867922 hasLocation W29968679222 @default.
• W2996867922 hasLocation W29968679223 @default.
• W2996867922 hasOpenAccess W2996867922 @default.
• W2996867922 hasPrimaryLocation W29968679221 @default.
• W2996867922 hasRelatedWork W1979138462 @default.
• W2996867922 hasRelatedWork W1979807775 @default.
• W2996867922 hasRelatedWork W1992545387 @default.
• W2996867922 hasRelatedWork W1998772963 @default.
• W2996867922 hasRelatedWork W2024101544 @default.
• W2996867922 hasRelatedWork W2049802165 @default.
• W2996867922 hasRelatedWork W2055532915 @default.
• W2996867922 hasRelatedWork W2079175123 @default.
• W2996867922 hasRelatedWork W4252770976 @default.

• next