FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2996984504> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2996984504 endingPage "41" @default.
• W2996984504 startingPage "41" @default.
• W2996984504 abstract "Chemomechanical methods such as Papacarie were developed as alternate dental caries removal methods to overcome major disadvantages of the conventional drilling technique. However, few studies have demonstrated the efficacy of Papacarie for caries removal using scanning electron microscope (SEM).The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and efficiency of Papacarie and the conventional bur method in caries removal from primary teeth.In this in vitro study, 30 freshly extracted, human primary molars with dentinal caries were obtained from the outpatient clinics at the Dental Hospital of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Each tooth was sectioned mesiodistally into two halves through the center of the lesion, and each half was randomly subjected to caries removal by Papacarie (Group I) and excavation using the conventional bur method (Group II). Time taken (efficiency) for removal of caries was noted using a stopwatch. Samples were then examined under SEM for presence of bacterial colonies (efficacy). For efficiency, data were analyzed using chi-square, and for efficacy, using t-test.There was no significant difference in the presence of bacteria in both groups under SEM (Papacarie = 23.3%; conventional method = 16.7%; P = 0.52). However, significantly more time was taken for caries removal with Papacarie (mean = 351.56 s) than with the conventional bur method (mean = 158.41 s) (P < 0.0001).Papacarie is as effective in removing dentinal bacteria as the conventional caries removal method but is less efficient, as the time taken for excavation was longer." @default.
• W2996984504 created "2020-01-10" @default.
• W2996984504 creator A5085055684 @default.
• W2996984504 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W2996984504 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2996984504 title "Efficacy and efficiency of papacarie versus conventional method in caries removal in primary teeth: An SEM study" @default.
• W2996984504 cites W1866037963 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W1973372904 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2000071947 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2004744460 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2004808001 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2006229020 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2007484257 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2008550535 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2010057211 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2041353422 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2053263721 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2059312186 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2070954478 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2098884074 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2105290607 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2165994658 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2297440745 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2315710390 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2409938702 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2410758886 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2411136707 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2423527426 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2434690197 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2548664941 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2628764666 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2769162607 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W2906617145 @default.
• W2996984504 cites W811084580 @default.
• W2996984504 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_104_18" @default.
• W2996984504 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6945313" @default.
• W2996984504 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31929777" @default.
• W2996984504 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2996984504 type Work @default.
• W2996984504 sameAs 2996984504 @default.
• W2996984504 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2996984504 countsByYear W29969845042022 @default.
• W2996984504 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2996984504 hasAuthorship W2996984504A5085055684 @default.
• W2996984504 hasBestOaLocation W29969845041 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConcept C2992053201 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConceptScore W2996984504C126322002 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConceptScore W2996984504C141071460 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConceptScore W2996984504C199343813 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConceptScore W2996984504C202271784 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConceptScore W2996984504C2992053201 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConceptScore W2996984504C3018023364 @default.
• W2996984504 hasConceptScore W2996984504C71924100 @default.
• W2996984504 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2996984504 hasLocation W29969845041 @default.
• W2996984504 hasLocation W29969845042 @default.
• W2996984504 hasLocation W29969845043 @default.
• W2996984504 hasLocation W29969845044 @default.
• W2996984504 hasOpenAccess W2996984504 @default.
• W2996984504 hasPrimaryLocation W29969845041 @default.
• W2996984504 hasRelatedWork W1963466596 @default.
• W2996984504 hasRelatedWork W2065000005 @default.
• W2996984504 hasRelatedWork W2353474657 @default.
• W2996984504 hasRelatedWork W2373029543 @default.
• W2996984504 hasRelatedWork W2375972871 @default.
• W2996984504 hasRelatedWork W2384499907 @default.
• W2996984504 hasRelatedWork W2388285210 @default.
• W2996984504 hasRelatedWork W2389141261 @default.
• W2996984504 hasRelatedWork W2419487804 @default.
• W2996984504 hasRelatedWork W2340694045 @default.
• W2996984504 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2996984504 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2996984504 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2996984504 magId "2996984504" @default.
• W2996984504 workType "article" @default.