FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2997505963> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2997505963 endingPage "601" @default.
• W2997505963 startingPage "562" @default.
• W2997505963 abstract "Something within the Silent Black Man Answered No!; or, Is Bartleby Uncle Tom on Wall Street? Laura Korobkin (bio) Consider the following description of what happens in a mid-nineteenth-century American literary text: Ordered to perform a task accessory to his primary work, a new, socially isolated worker refuses, though he continues to be an expert and efficient workman at his main tasks, at least for a time. Though impoverished and disempowered, the worker is also always calm, self-contained, dignified, and respectful. The work environment is dehumanizing and hierarchical; the master values workers as profit-making tools; years of exhausting, repetitive toil have diminished the workers' humanness. The new worker's quiet, persistent refusal to comply with orders that others customarily obey with unquestioning deference is an unprecedented, destabilizing event that interrupts the smoothly functioning capitalist workplace. This resistance stuns, bewilders, and infuriates the boss, producing repeated confrontations with his surprisingly self-sufficient inferior. Though expecting continued resistance, the boss determines to win the intimate conflict and thereby regain his sense of acknowledged mastery. Significantly, the text's narrator makes explicit from the start that the master does not and will never know what goes on inside the worker's head. Though the refusing worker neither actively [End Page 562] recruits others to any cause nor encourages them to disobey commands, the strange, silent patient man['s] pervasive influence gradually permeates the workplace, unsettling the master and his two main assistants, who side with the boss against the resistor. Because he cannot obtain the worker's obedience, the master becomes paradoxically disempowered and the servant correspondingly strengthened, though in a painfully limited way. Internally, the resistor may be unassailable, but physically he deteriorates; and though he could end the conflict at any time by changing his behavior and following orders, the resistor instead passively enables his own decline and, ultimately, his death, which occurs in a captivity to which he is carried unresisting.1 As readers will recognize (especially given this essay's title), every detail above fits both the interactions between Tom and Simon Legree in Harriet Beecher Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852), in which all quoted phrases appear, and between Bartleby and the lawyer-narrator in Herman Melville's Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street (1853).2 Of course, this description elides enormous differences: between short story and long novel, between very different narrative structures and genres, between the brutal Legree's Louisiana slave plantation and the apparently benevolent lawyer's Wall Street chambers, and between Tom's explicitly Christian refusal to injure anyone or acknowledge Legree's ownership of his soul and Bartleby's enigmatic, pointedly unexplained deployment of the phrase I would prefer not to. Yet the similarities detailed above are surely striking. Both texts focus intensely on the unfolding master-servant interaction and feature parallel chiasmic shifts in power and powerlessness between boss and worker. Nothing so aggravates both Legree and the lawyer as Tom's and Bartleby's quiet, respectful noncompliance, which both masters defensively interpret as mastery-challenging aggression (WHM, 9:23). Significantly, too, both Tom and Bartleby apparently choose to permit their own deaths. Given the extraordinary impact [End Page 563] and ubiquity of Stowe's novel when Bartleby was written, Melville's familiarity and engagement with Stowe would seem inescapable; nevertheless, so far as I am aware, no criticism of Melville or Stowe has considered Melville's story as a possible interrogation and adaptive rewriting of Stowe's depiction of the Tom-Legree relationship.3 Scholars' elision of Stowe's novel as interlocutor and intertext is especially surprising given the critical approaches to Melville's story that might bring it to mind. Though Stowe's Tom is the nineteenth century's most shocking and most commented-on literary Christ figure, the long (though typically ahistorical) critical tradition of reading Bartleby as a version of Christ, an emasculated Christ, and even Deleuze's new Christ or the brother to us all, has never triangulated in relation to Stowe's exactly contemporary Christlike hero.4 And though biographical-cultural readings have figured Melville, embittered by the implosion of his career and reputation after the mixed reception and..." @default.
• W2997505963 created "2020-01-10" @default.
• W2997505963 creator A5076995006 @default.
• W2997505963 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2997505963 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2997505963 title "Something within the Silent Black Man Answered No!; or, Is Bartleby Uncle Tom on Wall Street?" @default.
• W2997505963 cites W14371478 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W1485485383 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W1488663535 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W1491572940 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W1526930710 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W1531182490 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W1583567868 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W1981509251 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W1990549543 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W1991641084 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W1997147016 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2002466965 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2038335328 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2049803115 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2076953964 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2078150614 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2080960230 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2169601032 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2182504574 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2320705339 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2332472223 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W2335550148 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W353344562 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W363608898 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W433346041 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W570281144 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W606097365 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W608888760 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W613555426 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W613836517 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W614309663 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W622745645 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W622951807 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W629195122 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W629577383 @default.
• W2997505963 cites W656768300 @default.
• W2997505963 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/esq.2019.0016" @default.
• W2997505963 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2997505963 type Work @default.
• W2997505963 sameAs 2997505963 @default.
• W2997505963 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2997505963 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2997505963 hasAuthorship W2997505963A5076995006 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C2777020290 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C2780597233 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C57473165 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C11171543 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C127413603 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C144024400 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C15744967 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C17744445 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C18903297 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C199539241 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C2777020290 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C2780597233 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C57473165 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C77805123 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C78519656 @default.
• W2997505963 hasConceptScore W2997505963C86803240 @default.
• W2997505963 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2997505963 hasLocation W29975059631 @default.
• W2997505963 hasOpenAccess W2997505963 @default.
• W2997505963 hasPrimaryLocation W29975059631 @default.
• W2997505963 hasRelatedWork W1554249266 @default.
• W2997505963 hasRelatedWork W1884192967 @default.
• W2997505963 hasRelatedWork W1990439335 @default.
• W2997505963 hasRelatedWork W2088487969 @default.
• W2997505963 hasRelatedWork W2225799891 @default.
• W2997505963 hasRelatedWork W2346681221 @default.
• W2997505963 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2997505963 hasRelatedWork W3123428777 @default.
• W2997505963 hasRelatedWork W3140514088 @default.
• W2997505963 hasRelatedWork W4234858211 @default.
• W2997505963 hasVolume "65" @default.
• W2997505963 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2997505963 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2997505963 magId "2997505963" @default.
• W2997505963 workType "article" @default.