Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2997788005> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2997788005 endingPage "321.e11" @default.
- W2997788005 startingPage "321.e1" @default.
- W2997788005 abstract "•Circumferential early diastolic strain rate(DSR) can identify diastolic dysfunction •Circumferential DSR can better identify diastolic dysfunction than phase contrast •Circumferential DSR is obtained via routine LV contours for volumes and function Aim To assess the agreement of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) feature-tracking (FT) parameters with echocardiography to diagnose diastolic dysfunction; to determine whether a similar parameter to mitral inflow early diastolic velocity to early diastolic tissue velocity ratio (E/e’) can increase accuracy of imaging by dividing the phase contrast (PC) mitral inflow E-wave (E) with a CMRI-FT parameter; to compare the agreement between CMRI-FT and PC diastolic function assessment using echocardiography. Materials and methods Patients (n=71; 43 abnormal diastolic function) undergoing both CMRI and echocardiography independently were included. Echocardiography was the reference standard. CMRI-FT analysed the short and long axis cine contours. PC images of mitral inflow, tissue velocity, pulmonary vein flow, and left atrial area were assessed. Results Using CMRI-FT, the area under the curve (AUC) for identifying diastolic dysfunction was >0.80 for radial and circumferential strain, systolic strain rate (SSR), and early diastolic strain rate (DSR). For cases with CMRI-determined left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% (n=38), circumferential DSR was the only parameter with good accuracy (AUC=0.87; cut-off 0.93/s). E/circumferential DSR ratio and longitudinal strain had high accuracy in all patients (AUC=0.88 and 0.93 respectively) and CMRI-determined LVEF ≥50% (AUC=0.81; cut-off 76.7). Circumferential DSR showed the highest agreement with echocardiography (higher than E/circumferential DSR and PC assessment) in all cases (kappa 0.75; p<0001) and cases with CMRI LVEF ≥50% (kappa 0.73; p<0.0001). Conclusions CMRI-FT circumferential DSR showed the highest accuracy for determining diastolic dysfunction with good agreement with echocardiography. Circumferential DSR had higher accuracy than E/circumferential DSR and PC. To assess the agreement of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) feature-tracking (FT) parameters with echocardiography to diagnose diastolic dysfunction; to determine whether a similar parameter to mitral inflow early diastolic velocity to early diastolic tissue velocity ratio (E/e’) can increase accuracy of imaging by dividing the phase contrast (PC) mitral inflow E-wave (E) with a CMRI-FT parameter; to compare the agreement between CMRI-FT and PC diastolic function assessment using echocardiography. Patients (n=71; 43 abnormal diastolic function) undergoing both CMRI and echocardiography independently were included. Echocardiography was the reference standard. CMRI-FT analysed the short and long axis cine contours. PC images of mitral inflow, tissue velocity, pulmonary vein flow, and left atrial area were assessed. Using CMRI-FT, the area under the curve (AUC) for identifying diastolic dysfunction was >0.80 for radial and circumferential strain, systolic strain rate (SSR), and early diastolic strain rate (DSR). For cases with CMRI-determined left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% (n=38), circumferential DSR was the only parameter with good accuracy (AUC=0.87; cut-off 0.93/s). E/circumferential DSR ratio and longitudinal strain had high accuracy in all patients (AUC=0.88 and 0.93 respectively) and CMRI-determined LVEF ≥50% (AUC=0.81; cut-off 76.7). Circumferential DSR showed the highest agreement with echocardiography (higher than E/circumferential DSR and PC assessment) in all cases (kappa 0.75; p<0001) and cases with CMRI LVEF ≥50% (kappa 0.73; p<0.0001). CMRI-FT circumferential DSR showed the highest accuracy for determining diastolic dysfunction with good agreement with echocardiography. Circumferential DSR had higher accuracy than E/circumferential DSR and PC." @default.
- W2997788005 created "2020-01-10" @default.
- W2997788005 creator A5006892200 @default.
- W2997788005 creator A5016160940 @default.
- W2997788005 creator A5016334509 @default.
- W2997788005 creator A5019180241 @default.
- W2997788005 creator A5032045741 @default.
- W2997788005 creator A5035486727 @default.
- W2997788005 creator A5045011514 @default.
- W2997788005 creator A5061043671 @default.
- W2997788005 creator A5062513513 @default.
- W2997788005 creator A5088153511 @default.
- W2997788005 date "2020-04-01" @default.
- W2997788005 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W2997788005 title "Feature tracking for assessment of diastolic function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging" @default.
- W2997788005 cites W1499676007 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W1856267101 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W1947831648 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W1964441592 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W1977132134 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W1983440014 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W1989500574 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W1990748933 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2014328014 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2015064577 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2048875749 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2063693867 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2066095765 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2070616374 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2070676046 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2100962878 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2103498008 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2119340816 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2136027815 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2153784828 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2156627753 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2191588938 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2293035635 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2313186535 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2427094903 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2546447965 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2585092619 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W2769421166 @default.
- W2997788005 cites W370604 @default.
- W2997788005 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.11.013" @default.
- W2997788005 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31898961" @default.
- W2997788005 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W2997788005 type Work @default.
- W2997788005 sameAs 2997788005 @default.
- W2997788005 citedByCount "11" @default.
- W2997788005 countsByYear W29977880052021 @default.
- W2997788005 countsByYear W29977880052022 @default.
- W2997788005 countsByYear W29977880052023 @default.
- W2997788005 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2997788005 hasAuthorship W2997788005A5006892200 @default.
- W2997788005 hasAuthorship W2997788005A5016160940 @default.
- W2997788005 hasAuthorship W2997788005A5016334509 @default.
- W2997788005 hasAuthorship W2997788005A5019180241 @default.
- W2997788005 hasAuthorship W2997788005A5032045741 @default.
- W2997788005 hasAuthorship W2997788005A5035486727 @default.
- W2997788005 hasAuthorship W2997788005A5045011514 @default.
- W2997788005 hasAuthorship W2997788005A5061043671 @default.
- W2997788005 hasAuthorship W2997788005A5062513513 @default.
- W2997788005 hasAuthorship W2997788005A5088153511 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C2776008845 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C2778198053 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C2779161974 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C2780689522 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C2780829959 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C2987395694 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C52622490 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C57900726 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C78085059 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C126322002 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C126838900 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C143409427 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C154945302 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C164705383 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C2776008845 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C2778198053 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C2779161974 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C2780689522 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C2780829959 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C2987395694 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C41008148 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C52622490 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C57900726 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C71924100 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C78085059 @default.
- W2997788005 hasConceptScore W2997788005C84393581 @default.