Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2998652396> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W2998652396 endingPage "676" @default.
- W2998652396 startingPage "666" @default.
- W2998652396 abstract "This study discussed the legal standing of testimonium de auditu / hearsay evidence on child sex crime; a case study in the Decision of High Court Number: 45.PID.SUS/2018/PT.PDG. This study was analyzed through criminal law evidentiary theory and legal certainty theory. Then, it employed a normative juridical method which is supported by interviews with law enforcement officials relating to the cases raised in this paper. The results and analysis of this paper found that the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 65/PUU-VIII/2010 does not set limits on the receipt of testimonium de auditu. The Decision of the Constitutional Court does not specifically address testimonium de auditu witness, but it is one of the types of witnesses being debated. Based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court, testimonium de auditu witness can be accepted as evidence as long as it has relevance to the case being tried and other evidences. This “relevance” phrase is debated because there is no limit for the judge in determining the relevance. Thus, determining its relevance requires the judge’s shrewdness and intelligence in analyzing the case. However, based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 45.PID.SUS/2018/PT.PDG, the legal standing of testimonium de auditu / hearsay evidence is not recognized. Thus, the decision overturned the decision of the court of first instance. According to the author, the High Court judge was wrong in applying the evidentiary theory. In this case, the the High Court judge made the decision only based on the Positive Law ( Positief Wettelijk Bewijs Theorie ). This is contrary to the Indonesian criminal law evidentiary theory which adheres to the principle of Negatief Wettelijk Bewijs Theorie . In addition, the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 65/PUU-VIII/2010 has not provided legal certainty in determining whether or not testimonium de auditu witness can be used as evidence." @default.
- W2998652396 created "2020-01-10" @default.
- W2998652396 creator A5000313069 @default.
- W2998652396 creator A5009784704 @default.
- W2998652396 creator A5082117462 @default.
- W2998652396 date "2020-01-02" @default.
- W2998652396 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W2998652396 title "Legal Standing of Testimonium De Auditu on Child Sex Crime" @default.
- W2998652396 doi "https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i6.1275" @default.
- W2998652396 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W2998652396 type Work @default.
- W2998652396 sameAs 2998652396 @default.
- W2998652396 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2998652396 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2998652396 hasAuthorship W2998652396A5000313069 @default.
- W2998652396 hasAuthorship W2998652396A5009784704 @default.
- W2998652396 hasAuthorship W2998652396A5082117462 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C2776900844 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C2778069335 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C2778645526 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C2780066029 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C3019456619 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C144024400 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C158154518 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C17744445 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C199539241 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C2776154427 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C2776900844 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C2778069335 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C2778645526 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C2780066029 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C3019456619 @default.
- W2998652396 hasConceptScore W2998652396C44725695 @default.
- W2998652396 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W2998652396 hasLocation W29986523961 @default.
- W2998652396 hasOpenAccess W2998652396 @default.
- W2998652396 hasPrimaryLocation W29986523961 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W1549233003 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W1559709581 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W1566252649 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W1991074891 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W2157893295 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W2219442055 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W2350323377 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W2413284030 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W2786426792 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W2940496791 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W3014982562 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W3016002562 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W3024478374 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W3091777928 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W3132088358 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W3160513797 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W3169945750 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W6067019 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W2795744523 @default.
- W2998652396 hasRelatedWork W3124310518 @default.
- W2998652396 hasVolume "6" @default.
- W2998652396 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2998652396 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2998652396 magId "2998652396" @default.
- W2998652396 workType "article" @default.