FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2998926348> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2998926348 abstract "Abstract. In hydrological climate-change impact studies, Regional Climate Models (RCMs) are commonly used to transfer large-scale Global Climate Model (GCM) data to smaller scales and to provide more detailed regional information. However, there are often considerable biases in RCM simulations, which have led to the development of a number of bias correction approaches to provide more realistic climate simulations for impact studies. Bias correction procedures rely on the assumption that RCM biases do not change over time, because correction algorithms and their parameterizations are derived for current climate conditions and assumed to apply also for future climate conditions. This underlying assumption of bias stationarity is the main concern when using bias correction procedures. It is in principle not possible to test whether this assumption is actually fulfilled for future climate conditions. In this study, however, we demonstrate that it is possible to evaluate how well bias correction methods perform for conditions different from those used for calibration. For five Swedish catchments, several time series of RCM simulated precipitation and temperature were obtained from the ENSEMBLES data base and different commonly-used bias correction methods were applied. We then performed a differential split-sample test by dividing the data series into cold and warm respective dry and wet years. This enabled us to evaluate the performance of different bias correction procedures under systematically varying climate conditions. The differential split-sample test resulted in a large spread and a clear bias for some of the correction methods during validation years. More advanced correction methods such as distribution mapping performed relatively well even in the validation period, whereas simpler approaches resulted in the largest deviations and least reliable corrections for changed conditions. Therefore, we question the use of simple bias correction methods such as the widely used delta-change approach and linear scaling for RCM-based climate-change impact studies and recommend using higher-skill bias correction methods." @default.
• W2998926348 created "2020-01-23" @default.
• W2998926348 creator A5028147456 @default.
• W2998926348 creator A5033838875 @default.
• W2998926348 date "2012-11-12" @default.
• W2998926348 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2998926348 title "Is bias correction of Regional Climate Model (RCM) simulations possible for non-stationary conditions?" @default.
• W2998926348 cites W1598574616 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W1602738779 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W1652520942 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W1912030712 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W1964248494 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W1996014677 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2002123774 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2002340384 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2006041982 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2017559255 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2025826259 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2030504740 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2032848668 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2037641802 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2038294068 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2043260633 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2053974573 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2061857023 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2064908124 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2070086504 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2077284530 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2093141926 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2093228616 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2093788300 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2094771455 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2098034110 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2102872847 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2105993164 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2114725858 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2117355623 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2121798740 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2125070304 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2131875862 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2150285422 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2166535858 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2167313701 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W2168945835 @default.
• W2998926348 cites W4251598415 @default.
• W2998926348 doi "https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-12765-2012" @default.
• W2998926348 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2998926348 type Work @default.
• W2998926348 sameAs 2998926348 @default.
• W2998926348 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2998926348 countsByYear W29989263482013 @default.
• W2998926348 countsByYear W29989263482014 @default.
• W2998926348 countsByYear W29989263482015 @default.
• W2998926348 countsByYear W29989263482016 @default.
• W2998926348 countsByYear W29989263482017 @default.
• W2998926348 countsByYear W29989263482018 @default.
• W2998926348 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2998926348 hasAuthorship W2998926348A5028147456 @default.
• W2998926348 hasAuthorship W2998926348A5033838875 @default.
• W2998926348 hasBestOaLocation W29989263481 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C107054158 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C111368507 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C132651083 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C165838908 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C168754636 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C49204034 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConcept C93226319 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C105795698 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C107054158 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C111368507 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C127313418 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C127413603 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C132651083 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C146978453 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C149782125 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C153294291 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C165838908 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C168754636 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C185592680 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C198531522 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C205649164 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C2778755073 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C33923547 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C39432304 @default.
• W2998926348 hasConceptScore W2998926348C41008148 @default.

• next