FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2999364928> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2999364928 endingPage "341" @default.
• W2999364928 startingPage "334" @default.
• W2999364928 abstract "<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To investigate the influence of the inverted flap technique compared with traditional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the postoperative remodelling of outer retinal layers of idiopathic macular holes (MHs) &#x3e;450 µm. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We analyzed medical records and imaging studies of all patients with an idiopathic MH &#x3e;450 µm who underwent vitrectomy at the Sacco University Hospital, Milan, and the Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Verona, Italy, between January 2008 and December 2017. Out of 41 eyes evaluated, 17 were treated with traditional ILM peeling and 24 with the inverted ILM flap technique. All patients underwent follow-up examinations every 3 months and all of them completed a final visit 12 months after surgery. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters were evaluated at each visit. The main outcome measures were the postoperative recovery rate of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ), and postoperative BCVA. Correlations between OCT measurements and visual outcome were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The ELM recovery rate in the ILM peeling group (15/17 eyes, 88%) was higher than in the ILM flap group (14/24 eyes, 58%) (<i>p</i> = 0.079). The EZ recovery rate was similar in the 2 groups, 7/17 eyes (41%) in the ILM peeling and 8/24 eyes (33%) in the ILM flap group (<i>p</i> = 0.744). Eyes without a persistent hyper-reflective “plug” at the edges of the MH showed a significantly higher EZ recovery rate (11/18, 61%) compared with eyes showing a persistent plug (4/23, 17%) (<i>p</i> = 0.008). The mean BCVA improved significantly in both groups: from 0.93 logMAR (20/170) to 0.26 logMAR (20/36) in the ILM peeling and from 0.98 logMAR (20/190) to 0.37 logMAR (20/46) in the ILM flap group. The final BCVA tended to be better in the ILM peeling group (<i>p</i> = 0.085). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Given the limited information about the influence of ILM flap versus traditional ILM peeling in the postoperative remodelling of large idiopathic MHs, our data provides some new insights into the healing process of MHs &#x3e;450 µm. This should be considered as part of the decision process about whether to perform an ILM flap in these patients." @default.
• W2999364928 created "2020-01-23" @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5005932470 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5009066148 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5014873875 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5024049616 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5026548439 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5039638754 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5046481765 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5055094194 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5061954528 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5076161106 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5076341546 @default.
• W2999364928 creator A5088612566 @default.
• W2999364928 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W2999364928 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2999364928 title "Large Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery: Remodelling of Outer Retinal Layers after Traditional Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique" @default.
• W2999364928 cites W1982978147 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W1996475277 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W1997357554 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2021229083 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2023075738 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2032561407 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2065262375 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2117876072 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2584294989 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2748557410 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2774138829 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2790871808 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2801367683 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2805499702 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2809323863 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2883383233 @default.
• W2999364928 cites W2885128408 @default.
• W2999364928 doi "https://doi.org/10.1159/000505926" @default.
• W2999364928 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31940651" @default.
• W2999364928 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2999364928 type Work @default.
• W2999364928 sameAs 2999364928 @default.
• W2999364928 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2999364928 countsByYear W29993649282020 @default.
• W2999364928 countsByYear W29993649282021 @default.
• W2999364928 countsByYear W29993649282022 @default.
• W2999364928 countsByYear W29993649282023 @default.
• W2999364928 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5005932470 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5009066148 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5014873875 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5024049616 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5026548439 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5039638754 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5046481765 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5055094194 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5061954528 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5076161106 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5076341546 @default.
• W2999364928 hasAuthorship W2999364928A5088612566 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C188198153 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C2777344775 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C2778024200 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C2778818243 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C2780098626 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C2780827179 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C2781242345 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C3018016631 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C118487528 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C127413603 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C141071460 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C188198153 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C2777344775 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C2778024200 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C2778257484 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C2778818243 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C2780098626 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C2780827179 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C2781242345 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C3018016631 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C71924100 @default.
• W2999364928 hasConceptScore W2999364928C78519656 @default.
• W2999364928 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2999364928 hasLocation W29993649281 @default.
• W2999364928 hasOpenAccess W2999364928 @default.
• W2999364928 hasPrimaryLocation W29993649281 @default.
• W2999364928 hasRelatedWork W2026832429 @default.
• W2999364928 hasRelatedWork W2086483156 @default.
• W2999364928 hasRelatedWork W2606825378 @default.
• W2999364928 hasRelatedWork W2756358520 @default.
• W2999364928 hasRelatedWork W2955015505 @default.
• W2999364928 hasRelatedWork W2980312449 @default.
• W2999364928 hasRelatedWork W3031300807 @default.
• W2999364928 hasRelatedWork W3033496381 @default.
• W2999364928 hasRelatedWork W3093593897 @default.

• next