FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2999451010> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2999451010 abstract "Abstract Background Ventricular arterial coupling (VAC) can be defined as the ratio of the arterial elastance (Ea) to the ventricular elastance (Ees). . The Ea/Ees ratio has been consistently demonstrated to be a reliable and effective measure of cardiovascular performance. The Chen single-beat method is the most used non-invasive method for this measurement. Carotid artery wave intensity (WI) is also considered a index of VAC, as the first peak (W1) represents the forward compression wave, reflecting left ventricle (LV) contractile function. However, data about the relationship between the two methods are nowadays scarce. Purpose Aim of the study was to compare carotid WI and Ventricular-Arterial Coupling (VAC) in a population of patient with heart failure. Methods We examined 50 consecutive patients with heart failure (9 females, 41 males, mean age 67 + 12 years, range 29-97 years, 34 ischemic, 16 not ischemic). Carotid artery wave intensity was achieved merging the echo-tracking of the vessel with its doppler signal. Simultaneous not-invasive oscillometric blood pressure was obtained. The VAC was assessed by the ratio between the arterial elastance (Ea) and the end-systolic ventricular elastance (Ees). Ea was calculated from stroke volume (SV) and end-systolic pressure (Ea=(Systolic BP x 0.9)/SV) and Ees was calculated by the modified single-beat Chen method, using an estimated normalized ventricular elastance at arterial end-diastole (ENd) Ees = [Diastolic BP-(ENd(est) x Systolic BP x 0.9)]/(ENd(est) x SV). Three subgroups were created according to the left ventricle ejection fraction values (LVEF ≤ 35%, LVEF &gt;35% &lt;50%, LVEF ≥ 50%, with 26, 14, 10 patients respectively). Results The correlation between Ea/Ees and W1 was significant (Pearson’s correlation r= -0.35, p 0.01). The W1 and VAC values of the three LVEF-sorted subgroups were processed with ANOVA test (p 0.054 and p 0.0002 respectively). W1 values resulted to be, as expected, reduced especially in the group of severe ventricular dysfunction (mean 4,97+- 3,29), as well as the ventricular-arterial coupling was increased (mean 2.04 +- 1.04). Interestingly W1 shows to be correlated with the Left atrial volume index (Pearson’s correlation r= -0,30 p = 0,037). Conclusions Carotid WI technique seems to be a reliable method to estimate the ventricular-arterial interplay. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the respective role of W1 and Ea/Ees in the prognostic evaluation. Results EF ≤ 35 (n = 10) 35 &lt; EF &lt; 50 (n = 14) EF≥ 50 (n = 26) p value W1 4.97 ± 3.29 8.05 ± 3.79 7.85 ± 3.12 0.054 Ea/Ees 2.04 ± 1.04 1.39 ± 0.31 1.16 ± 0.3 0.0002 Abstract 415 Figure." @default.
• W2999451010 created "2020-01-23" @default.
• W2999451010 creator A5010063158 @default.
• W2999451010 creator A5012321716 @default.
• W2999451010 creator A5042171930 @default.
• W2999451010 creator A5055147207 @default.
• W2999451010 creator A5058397680 @default.
• W2999451010 creator A5059431121 @default.
• W2999451010 creator A5060720584 @default.
• W2999451010 creator A5075732766 @default.
• W2999451010 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W2999451010 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2999451010 title "415 Comparison between two methods for assessing ventricular-arterial coupling: the Chen single-beat method and carotid artery wave intensity" @default.
• W2999451010 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez319.229" @default.
• W2999451010 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W2999451010 type Work @default.
• W2999451010 sameAs 2999451010 @default.
• W2999451010 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2999451010 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2999451010 hasAuthorship W2999451010A5010063158 @default.
• W2999451010 hasAuthorship W2999451010A5012321716 @default.
• W2999451010 hasAuthorship W2999451010A5042171930 @default.
• W2999451010 hasAuthorship W2999451010A5055147207 @default.
• W2999451010 hasAuthorship W2999451010A5058397680 @default.
• W2999451010 hasAuthorship W2999451010A5059431121 @default.
• W2999451010 hasAuthorship W2999451010A5060720584 @default.
• W2999451010 hasAuthorship W2999451010A5075732766 @default.
• W2999451010 hasBestOaLocation W29994510101 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConcept C2778198053 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConcept C2778921608 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConcept C57900726 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConcept C78085059 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConcept C80461066 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConceptScore W2999451010C126322002 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConceptScore W2999451010C164705383 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConceptScore W2999451010C2778198053 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConceptScore W2999451010C2778921608 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConceptScore W2999451010C57900726 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConceptScore W2999451010C71924100 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConceptScore W2999451010C78085059 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConceptScore W2999451010C80461066 @default.
• W2999451010 hasConceptScore W2999451010C84393581 @default.
• W2999451010 hasLocation W29994510101 @default.
• W2999451010 hasOpenAccess W2999451010 @default.
• W2999451010 hasPrimaryLocation W29994510101 @default.
• W2999451010 hasRelatedWork W1217748 @default.
• W2999451010 hasRelatedWork W14216951 @default.
• W2999451010 hasRelatedWork W1484868 @default.
• W2999451010 hasRelatedWork W15220972 @default.
• W2999451010 hasRelatedWork W15968034 @default.
• W2999451010 hasRelatedWork W16744295 @default.
• W2999451010 hasRelatedWork W1838166 @default.
• W2999451010 hasRelatedWork W6697520 @default.
• W2999451010 hasRelatedWork W9464670 @default.
• W2999451010 hasRelatedWork W9482636 @default.
• W2999451010 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2999451010 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2999451010 magId "2999451010" @default.
• W2999451010 workType "article" @default.