Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3000000500> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3000000500 endingPage "309" @default.
- W3000000500 startingPage "298" @default.
- W3000000500 abstract "Background: Physicians’ and patients’ decision-making process between bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) and hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) may be influenced by a variety of factors in the young, active athlete. Purpose: To determine the incidence of both ACL graft revisions and contralateral ACL tears resulting in subsequent ACLR in a cohort of high school– and college-aged athletes who initially underwent primary ACLR with either a BTB or a hamstring autograft. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Study inclusion criteria were patients aged 14 to 22 years who were injured in sports, had a contralateral normal knee, and were scheduled to undergo unilateral primary ACLR with either a BTB or a hamstring autograft. All patients were prospectively followed for 6 years to determine whether any subsequent ACLR was performed in either knee after their initial ACLR. Multivariable regression modeling controlled for age, sex, ethnicity/race, body mass index, sport and competition level, baseline activity level, knee laxity, and graft type. The 6-year outcomes were the incidence of subsequent ACLR in either knee. Results: A total of 839 patients were eligible, of which 770 (92%) had 6-year follow-up for the primary outcome measure of the incidence of subsequent ACLR. The median age was 17 years, with 48% female, and the distribution of BTB and hamstring grafts was 492 (64%) and 278 (36%), respectively. The incidence of subsequent ACLR at 6 years was 9.2% in the ipsilateral knee, 11.2% in the contralateral normal knee, and 19.7% for either knee. High-grade preoperative knee laxity (odds ratio [OR], 2.4 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.9]; P = .001), autograft type (OR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3-3.5]; P = .004), and age (OR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7-1.0]; P = .009) were the 3 most influential predictors of ACL graft revision in the ipsilateral knee. The odds of ACL graft revision were 2.1 times higher for patients receiving a hamstring autograft than patients receiving a BTB autograft (95% CI, 1.3-3.5; P = .004). No significant differences were found between autograft choices when looking at the incidence of subsequent ACLR in the contralateral knee. Conclusion: There was a high incidence of both ACL graft revisions and contralateral normal ACL tears resulting in subsequent ACLR in this young athletic cohort. The incidence of ACL graft revision at 6 years after index surgery was 2.1 times higher with a hamstring autograft compared with a BTB autograft." @default.
- W3000000500 created "2020-01-23" @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5020528316 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5020910072 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5021136719 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5024159849 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5027571385 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5032624872 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5035916310 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5041958627 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5042320697 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5042672153 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5044848659 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5053876222 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5054690699 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5061528899 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5071538658 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5078747796 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5080733199 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5081171321 @default.
- W3000000500 creator A5090977175 @default.
- W3000000500 date "2020-01-09" @default.
- W3000000500 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3000000500 title "Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in High School and College-Aged Athletes: Does Autograft Choice Influence Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Rates?" @default.
- W3000000500 cites W1480376833 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W1847873103 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W185004365 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W1938683852 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W1951724000 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W1981232766 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W1983069129 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W1983869174 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W1996137742 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2016885744 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2030913247 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2067473104 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2072916459 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2076653261 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2085474335 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2094316481 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2098431218 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2100375466 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2111223582 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2114970576 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2116394868 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2134843796 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2137228076 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2148267452 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2157111701 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2162217880 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2162321417 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2163295045 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2163591061 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2259919644 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2278417395 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2300172772 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2324476532 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2463769665 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2506063016 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2512967686 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W2588821174 @default.
- W3000000500 cites W4245487806 @default.
- W3000000500 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519892991" @default.
- W3000000500 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7319140" @default.
- W3000000500 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31917613" @default.
- W3000000500 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3000000500 type Work @default.
- W3000000500 sameAs 3000000500 @default.
- W3000000500 citedByCount "69" @default.
- W3000000500 countsByYear W30000005002020 @default.
- W3000000500 countsByYear W30000005002021 @default.
- W3000000500 countsByYear W30000005002022 @default.
- W3000000500 countsByYear W30000005002023 @default.
- W3000000500 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5020528316 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5020910072 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5021136719 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5024159849 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5027571385 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5032624872 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5035916310 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5041958627 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5042320697 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5042672153 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5044848659 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5053876222 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5054690699 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5061528899 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5071538658 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5078747796 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5080733199 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5081171321 @default.
- W3000000500 hasAuthorship W3000000500A5090977175 @default.
- W3000000500 hasBestOaLocation W30000005002 @default.
- W3000000500 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W3000000500 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W3000000500 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3000000500 hasConcept C141071460 @default.