FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3001001497> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3001001497 endingPage "1599" @default.
• W3001001497 startingPage "1593" @default.
• W3001001497 abstract "Background In 2016, orthopaedic surgeons received nearly USD 300 million from industry, with the top 10% of recipients making more than 95% of the total amount. The degree to which gender may be associated with industry compensation has not been well explored; however, this may be confounded by a number of variables, including academic productivity, experience, and other factors. We wished to explore the variability in payment distribution by gender after controlling for these factors. Questions/purposes (1) Do men or women academic orthopaedic surgeons receive more payments from industry? (2) To what degree do any observed differences between the genders persist, even after accounting for identifiable factors, including academic rank, scholarly productivity, regional location of university, subspecialty selection as identified by fellowships completed, and years since completion of residency? Methods This study was a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of surgeons practicing in orthopaedic surgery academic departments in the United States. Academic orthopaedic surgery departments were identified using the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database. Publicly available data on gender, academic rank, scholarly productivity, regional location of university, fellowships completed, and years since residency graduation were collected from institutional websites. Industry funding data for 2016 were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database, and scholarly productivity data through 2017 were collected from Scopus. A total of 2939 academic orthopaedic surgeons, 2620 (89%) men and 319 (11%) women from 126 programs were identified. Men and women surgeons were different in most of the variables collected, and all except region of university were associated with differences in industry payments. Results The median payment for men surgeons was greater than that for women (USD 1027 [interquartile range USD 125-USD 9616] versus USD 177 [IQR USD 47-USD 1486]; difference of medians, USD 850; p < 0.001]. After accounting for potentially confounding variables like faculty rank, years since residency, H-index and subspecialty choice, women faculty members still received only 29% of payments received by otherwise comparable men orthopaedists (beta coefficient for gender = 0.29 [95% CI 0.20 to 0.44; p < 0.001]). Conclusions Women academic orthopaedic surgeons received only 29% of the industry payments received by men, even after controlling for faculty rank, years since residency, H-index, and subspecialty selection. This gender-related disparity may hinder the career advancement of women orthopaedic surgeons. Clinical Relevance Increased transparency by companies can help guide orthopaedic surgeons who wish to receive industry funding." @default.
• W3001001497 created "2020-01-30" @default.
• W3001001497 creator A5027139702 @default.
• W3001001497 creator A5050421031 @default.
• W3001001497 creator A5073217462 @default.
• W3001001497 creator A5073513100 @default.
• W3001001497 creator A5075487631 @default.
• W3001001497 creator A5082306052 @default.
• W3001001497 date "2020-01-13" @default.
• W3001001497 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W3001001497 title "Men Receive Three Times More Industry Payments than Women Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons, Even After Controlling for Confounding Variables" @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2081386529 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2098140110 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2337861375 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2533725157 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2601745884 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2621266762 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2792529000 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2884278038 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2885337939 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2911353405 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2911495617 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2944834085 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2954676106 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W2978292647 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W592159461 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W649797273 @default.
• W3001001497 cites W76613636 @default.
• W3001001497 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000001132" @default.
• W3001001497 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7310494" @default.
• W3001001497 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31977436" @default.
• W3001001497 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3001001497 type Work @default.
• W3001001497 sameAs 3001001497 @default.
• W3001001497 citedByCount "23" @default.
• W3001001497 countsByYear W30010014972020 @default.
• W3001001497 countsByYear W30010014972021 @default.
• W3001001497 countsByYear W30010014972022 @default.
• W3001001497 countsByYear W30010014972023 @default.
• W3001001497 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3001001497 hasAuthorship W3001001497A5027139702 @default.
• W3001001497 hasAuthorship W3001001497A5050421031 @default.
• W3001001497 hasAuthorship W3001001497A5073217462 @default.
• W3001001497 hasAuthorship W3001001497A5073513100 @default.
• W3001001497 hasAuthorship W3001001497A5075487631 @default.
• W3001001497 hasAuthorship W3001001497A5082306052 @default.
• W3001001497 hasBestOaLocation W30010014971 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C2776534028 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C2779529714 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C2780090960 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C2780642338 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C10138342 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C126322002 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C139719470 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C141071460 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C144024400 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C145097563 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C149923435 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C160735492 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C162324750 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C17744445 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C199539241 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C204983608 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C2524010 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C2776534028 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C2779529714 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C2780090960 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C2780642338 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C33923547 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C50522688 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C512399662 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C68312169 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C71924100 @default.
• W3001001497 hasConceptScore W3001001497C77350462 @default.
• W3001001497 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W3001001497 hasLocation W30010014971 @default.
• W3001001497 hasLocation W30010014972 @default.
• W3001001497 hasLocation W30010014973 @default.
• W3001001497 hasOpenAccess W3001001497 @default.

• next