Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3003199145> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 items per page.
- W3003199145 endingPage "33" @default.
- W3003199145 startingPage "27" @default.
- W3003199145 abstract "Abstract. The difference of opinion regarding interest whether including usury or not is very diverse and very sharp, there are those who think it is can and some who think it is can not. The difference is related to understanding illat. Placement on the chronology of the decline of usury verses is one of the points that determine a ulama's final opinion on bank interest. Similarly, Dawam Rahardjo whose opinion is different from most scholars. Based on these problems, the formulation of the problem and the purpose of this study is to Know How the Law of Islamic Law about Interest. M. Dawam Rahardjo's view of interest. And a review or criticism of Muamalah's Jurisprudence towards the opinion of M. Dawam Rahardjo regarding interest. The method of this research is qualitative, and data collection uses the documentation method by finding and studying books or other sources such as previous research or other sources relating to interest. The results of this study note that (1) Interest is in addition to the principal loan. Contrary to QS. Ar-Rum: 39 & QS. Al-Baqarah: 279. (2) The element of volunteerism as a reason for allowing interest is contrary to the QS. An-Nisa: 161 (3) Inflation as a reason for allowing interest is contrary to. QS. Ar-Rum: 39 (4) Ad'afan muda'afan in interest is contrary to the QS. Al-Baqarah: 278.
 Abstrak. Perbedaan pendapat mengenai bunga bank apakah termasuk riba atau bukan sangat beragam dan sangat tajam, ada yang berpendapat boleh dan ada yang berpendapat tidak boleh. Perbedaan tersebut berkaitan dengan pemahaman illat hukum. Penempatan terhadap kronologis turunnya ayat riba merupakan satu diantara poin yang menentukan suatu pendapat akhir ulama tentang bunga bank. Sama halnya dengan Dawam Rahardjo yang pendapatnya berbeda dengan ulama kebanyakan. Berdasarkan permasalahan tersebut maka rumusan masalah dan tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah Untuk Mengetahui Bagaimana Hukum Fikih Muamalah tentang Bunga Bank. Pandangan M. Dawam Rahardjo mengenai Bunga Bank. Dan Tinjauan atau Kritik Fikih Muamalah terhadap Pendapat M. Dawam Rahardjo mengenai Bunga Bank. Metode penelitian ini adalah kualitatif, dan pengumpulan data menggunakan metode dokumentasi dengan mencari dan mempelajari buku-buku ataupun sumber lain seperti penelitian terdahulu ataupun sumber lainnya yang berkaitan dengan bunga bank. Hasil dari penelitian ini diketahui bahwa Bunga Bank menurut Hukum Fikih Muamalah haram karena memiliki persamaan ilat hukum dengan riba. Bunga Bank menurut M. Dawam Rahardjo boleh karena beliau lebih melihat dari sisi moralitas, ayat pelarangan riba beliau lebih menekankan pada pelarangan berlipat ganda. Tinjauan atau Kritik Hukum Fikih Muamalah terhadap Pendapat M. Dawam Rahardjo mengenai Bunga Bank, yaitu beliau tidak mengemukakan bagaimana persamaan bunga bank dan interest menurut beliau." @default.
- W3003199145 created "2020-02-07" @default.
- W3003199145 creator A5000136633 @default.
- W3003199145 creator A5012256896 @default.
- W3003199145 creator A5069926576 @default.
- W3003199145 date "2021-07-06" @default.
- W3003199145 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
- W3003199145 title "Analisis Fikih Muamalah terhadap Pemikiran M. Dawam Rahardjo Mengenai Bunga Bank" @default.
- W3003199145 doi "https://doi.org/10.29313/jres.v1i1.99" @default.
- W3003199145 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3003199145 type Work @default.
- W3003199145 sameAs 3003199145 @default.
- W3003199145 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3003199145 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3003199145 hasAuthorship W3003199145A5000136633 @default.
- W3003199145 hasAuthorship W3003199145A5012256896 @default.
- W3003199145 hasAuthorship W3003199145A5069926576 @default.
- W3003199145 hasBestOaLocation W30031991451 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C2777764128 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C2778832681 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C4445939 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C10138342 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C138885662 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C15708023 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C162324750 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C17744445 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C199539241 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C27206212 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C2777764128 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C2778832681 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C4445939 @default.
- W3003199145 hasConceptScore W3003199145C7991579 @default.
- W3003199145 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W3003199145 hasLocation W30031991451 @default.
- W3003199145 hasOpenAccess W3003199145 @default.
- W3003199145 hasPrimaryLocation W30031991451 @default.
- W3003199145 hasRelatedWork W10961258 @default.
- W3003199145 hasRelatedWork W13326273 @default.
- W3003199145 hasRelatedWork W17610703 @default.
- W3003199145 hasRelatedWork W31783962 @default.
- W3003199145 hasRelatedWork W36883455 @default.
- W3003199145 hasRelatedWork W6192908 @default.
- W3003199145 hasRelatedWork W6299935 @default.
- W3003199145 hasRelatedWork W8101122 @default.
- W3003199145 hasRelatedWork W8420095 @default.
- W3003199145 hasRelatedWork W853558 @default.
- W3003199145 hasVolume "1" @default.
- W3003199145 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3003199145 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3003199145 magId "3003199145" @default.
- W3003199145 workType "article" @default.