FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3003669103> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3003669103 abstract "Introduction- Reinforced Concrete Frames (RCF) constitute a significant portion of the building stock in areas with seismic hazard. Many older buildings of this type were designed and constructed with little or no consideration of lateral load effects. When not properly designed, the Beam-Column Joints (BCJ) can be the weak links in the RCF. Unreinforced BCJ are still quite prevalent in older-type construction especially in Asia and Latin America. The unreinforced BCJ are key components that have a significant impact on the structure’s behavior of RCF. Regarding the analytical approaches applicable to BCJ, the approaches range from simplified to more elaborate and phenomenological-oriented. Unfortunately, most of them lack of simplicity, numerical stability and practicality to robustly evaluate the performance of unreinforced BCJ. This paper presents an analytical approach to modeling unreinforced BCJ.Objective- The aim of this paper is to present a modified modeling approach to simulate the nonlinear behavior of unreinforced BCJ in RCF structures.Method- The approach presented is based on the model presented in [1]. The model was modified to follow the same nomenclature of the [2]. In the proposed approach, the BCJ subassembly is represented by (1) a set of rigid links placed in cross-shape are used to represent the joint geometry, (2) a zero-length element with an empirical quad-backbone curve, placed at the middle point of the rigid links, to represent the joint shear behavior, and (3) columns and beams elements modeled with fiber formulation and five integration points to capture the material nonlinearity of the elements that frame into the joint. The approach was implemented in the OpenSEES platform, and this was validated with 13 test results of unreinforced BCJ documented in the literature.Results- The proposed modelling approach can satisfactorily predict the joint shear capacity. A 2% difference and a standard deviation of about 11% were obtained when compared to 13 test results of unreinforced BCJ documented in the literature. In terms of cyclic behavior, the proposed modelling approach shown to adequately capture the initial stiffness, strength degradation, reloading stiffness, pre-capping, and post-capping capacity.Conclusions- The method proposed presents satisfactory agreement with the test results analyzed. Taking into account the minor modifications applied to the proposed method and the uncertainties associated with the materials, test measurements, test setup, and the tolerances, the proposed method can satisfactorily predict the unreinforced BCJ shear capacity in RCF structures. It is assumed that the procedures presented here will contribute in the incorporation of the unreinforced BCJ flexibility when modeling older-type RCF construction in a pragmatic manner." @default.
• W3003669103 created "2020-02-07" @default.
• W3003669103 creator A5008315198 @default.
• W3003669103 creator A5090800017 @default.
• W3003669103 date "2020-01-28" @default.
• W3003669103 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3003669103 title "Nonlinear analysis of unreinforced beam-column joints" @default.
• W3003669103 doi "https://doi.org/10.17981/10.17981/ingecuc.16.1.2020.09" @default.
• W3003669103 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3003669103 type Work @default.
• W3003669103 sameAs 3003669103 @default.
• W3003669103 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3003669103 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3003669103 hasAuthorship W3003669103A5008315198 @default.
• W3003669103 hasAuthorship W3003669103A5090800017 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConcept C152006893 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConcept C158622935 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConcept C535899295 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConceptScore W3003669103C121332964 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConceptScore W3003669103C127413603 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConceptScore W3003669103C152006893 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConceptScore W3003669103C158622935 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConceptScore W3003669103C41008148 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConceptScore W3003669103C535899295 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConceptScore W3003669103C62520636 @default.
• W3003669103 hasConceptScore W3003669103C66938386 @default.
• W3003669103 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3003669103 hasLocation W30036691031 @default.
• W3003669103 hasOpenAccess W3003669103 @default.
• W3003669103 hasPrimaryLocation W30036691031 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W191871051 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2010852069 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2017192538 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2025583854 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2078517508 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2134106082 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2167388098 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2186466261 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2339830932 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2613944906 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2627054208 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2736624405 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2760343503 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2883822526 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W2948618307 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W3011846320 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W3033808559 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W3126218499 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W3136206738 @default.
• W3003669103 hasRelatedWork W3207734048 @default.
• W3003669103 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W3003669103 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3003669103 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3003669103 magId "3003669103" @default.
• W3003669103 workType "article" @default.