FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3004070748> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3004070748 abstract "<p>Bridges are highly complex structures exposed to heavy environmental and mechanical loads, which require immense financial investments in all life cycle periods, from planning, design, operation and end of life phase. The longest period in whole life cycle of a bridge is operational phase which includes numerous maintenance and repair activities. Timing of these activities and their extent is a crucial factor that influences bridge future performance.</p> <p>Traditionally, the decision to perform maintenance is based on the infrastructure managers' observations, judgments and choices which are derived from inspection results, available budgets and abrupt failures. Though, maintenance based on these drivers very often leads to undue maintenance with increased cost. For this reason, predictive maintenance is considered to be a most effective maintenance policy that suggests to perform maintenance only where it is promptly needed. However, predictive maintenance poses decision-making challenges for infrastructure managers. Particularly for road infrastructure networks, the maintenance decision-making is a difficult task due to a widespread network of diverse infrastructure objects, availability demands, deterioration rate and budget constraints. Such infrastructure maintenance requirements pose decision-making dilemmas to the infrastructure managers, where maintenance planning is challenged by the number of conflicting issues (e.g. limited budget vs. aging network, the risk of failures vs. traffic intensity over an object).</p> <p>This paper tries to examine the effect of two opposing maintenance strategies for life cycle management of bridges, corrective and preventive maintenance based on historical data about bridges in three countries and 30 years of experience. The maintenance costs for bridge structural elements at different condition levels are analysed, based on the data from three countries, Croatia, Slovenia and the Netherlands, where different approaches to maintenance strategies are being applied. The overall maintenance costs over a longer period of time, up to 30 years are collected and analysed, with the aim to clearly define pros and cons for both approaches.</p>" @default.
• W3004070748 created "2020-02-07" @default.
• W3004070748 creator A5015965218 @default.
• W3004070748 creator A5024642431 @default.
• W3004070748 creator A5085892899 @default.
• W3004070748 creator A5086709490 @default.
• W3004070748 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W3004070748 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3004070748 title "Different bridge maintenance strategies and life cycle costs: Comparison of costs in Croatia, Slovenia and the Netherlands" @default.
• W3004070748 cites W2473731169 @default.
• W3004070748 cites W2772730138 @default.
• W3004070748 cites W2773792804 @default.
• W3004070748 cites W2790130312 @default.
• W3004070748 doi "https://doi.org/10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0556" @default.
• W3004070748 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W3004070748 type Work @default.
• W3004070748 sameAs 3004070748 @default.
• W3004070748 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3004070748 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W3004070748 hasAuthorship W3004070748A5015965218 @default.
• W3004070748 hasAuthorship W3004070748A5024642431 @default.
• W3004070748 hasAuthorship W3004070748A5085892899 @default.
• W3004070748 hasAuthorship W3004070748A5086709490 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C100776233 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C141417316 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C22212356 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C2777188360 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C2778966251 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C4402595 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C70452415 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C100776233 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C112930515 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C126322002 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C127413603 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C141417316 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C144133560 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C200601418 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C21547014 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C22212356 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C2777188360 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C2778966251 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C41008148 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C4402595 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C66938386 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C70452415 @default.
• W3004070748 hasConceptScore W3004070748C71924100 @default.
• W3004070748 hasLocation W30040707481 @default.
• W3004070748 hasOpenAccess W3004070748 @default.
• W3004070748 hasPrimaryLocation W30040707481 @default.
• W3004070748 hasRelatedWork W1511878586 @default.
• W3004070748 hasRelatedWork W1664823671 @default.
• W3004070748 hasRelatedWork W187341415 @default.
• W3004070748 hasRelatedWork W2100020022 @default.
• W3004070748 hasRelatedWork W2324830388 @default.
• W3004070748 hasRelatedWork W2341728590 @default.
• W3004070748 hasRelatedWork W2358839942 @default.
• W3004070748 hasRelatedWork W2389091175 @default.
• W3004070748 hasRelatedWork W2393363437 @default.
• W3004070748 hasRelatedWork W568250228 @default.
• W3004070748 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3004070748 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3004070748 magId "3004070748" @default.
• W3004070748 workType "article" @default.