Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3004772343> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 66 of
66
with 100 items per page.
- W3004772343 startingPage "43" @default.
- W3004772343 abstract "This Article studies statutory interpretation as it is practiced in the federal courts of appeal. Much of the academic commentary in this field focuses on the Supreme Court, which skews the debate and unduly polarizes the field. This Article investigates more broadly by looking at the seventy-two federal appellate cases that cite King v. Burwell in the two years after the Court issued its decision. In deciding that the words “established by the State” encompass a federal program, the Court in King reached a pragmatic and practical result based on statutory scheme and purpose at a fairly high level of generality. Cases that cite King might be expected to accept or reject this kind of purpose move, and to generally be more attentive to matters of interpretation.The results presented here reveal a dynamic landscape in which federal appeals courts seem relatively uncommitted to ideological battles over interpretive principles, notwithstanding the relatively small number of opinions that contain rhetorical flourishes in this area. Courts freely pursue the best reading of statutory text through textual and purposive means: linguistic analysis of the words, contextual readings of multiple statutory provisions and analysis of the statutory scheme, and evidence of purpose gleaned from textual and extra-textual sources. While not pervasive, legislative history commonly guides interpretation. These results hold across cases where text and purpose conflict and where text and purpose are in harmony. In cases of conflict, the results also hold across cases that reach results primarily based on text and cases that reach results based primarily on purpose. Further, given the opportunity to weigh in on lower court statutory construction debates, the Supreme Court has remained silent. This Article concludes that it is normatively desirable that lower federal courts have not embraced the statutory construction battles in an all-encompassing way. The Article concludes with the caveat that this research should be revisited to assess the effect of Donald Trump’s appointments to the judiciary." @default.
- W3004772343 created "2020-02-14" @default.
- W3004772343 creator A5012412391 @default.
- W3004772343 date "2019-01-01" @default.
- W3004772343 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W3004772343 title "Supreme Silence and Precedential Pragmatism: King v. Burwell and Statutory Interpretation in the Federal Courts of Appeals" @default.
- W3004772343 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W3004772343 type Work @default.
- W3004772343 sameAs 3004772343 @default.
- W3004772343 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3004772343 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3004772343 hasAuthorship W3004772343A5012412391 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C192562157 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C2777553895 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C2778449503 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C2779204856 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C138885662 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C144024400 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C158129432 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C17744445 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C192562157 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C199539241 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C2777553895 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C2778272461 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C2778449503 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C2779204856 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C41895202 @default.
- W3004772343 hasConceptScore W3004772343C527412718 @default.
- W3004772343 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W3004772343 hasLocation W30047723431 @default.
- W3004772343 hasOpenAccess W3004772343 @default.
- W3004772343 hasPrimaryLocation W30047723431 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W121023195 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W1509746916 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W1554519358 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W1561324788 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W1600250008 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W1754009461 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W1763151261 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W251342527 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W2588840265 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W2589612328 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W2737279112 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W287195262 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W2987129175 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W3121155476 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W3123276741 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W3125985170 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W3134342816 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W564255723 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W586040727 @default.
- W3004772343 hasRelatedWork W1821040121 @default.
- W3004772343 hasVolume "103" @default.
- W3004772343 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3004772343 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3004772343 magId "3004772343" @default.
- W3004772343 workType "article" @default.