Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3005087882> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W3005087882 endingPage "230" @default.
- W3005087882 startingPage "224" @default.
- W3005087882 abstract "ABSTRACTIntroduction: The examination of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) can be done by reviewing their complaints and through a capillary blood glucose level test to determine the value of their Random Blood Glucose Level. QRMA (Quantum Resonance Magnetic Analyzer) is claimed to be able to check the patient’s bodily condition (including blood glucose) with an accuracy of 85%. The purpose of this study was to verify the validity of the QRMA tool and its accuracy by comparing the results of the anamnesis and the examination conducted using the capillary blood glucose test method.Methods: The research method used was a cross-sectional design. The total sample consisted of 44 respondents in the working area of the Community Health Centers in Yogyakarta with the risk factor being blood sugar level instability. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The main variable in this study was the value of the blood sugar level measured based on the coefficient value of the QRMA tool and the value of Random Blood Glucose obtained through the capillary blood glucose test.Results: The blood glucose value was not correlated significantly with the coefficient value of QRMA. The value of blood glucose when examined alongside the result of the respondent's anamnesis showed there to be a significant difference. The value of the QRMA coefficient when examined against the results from the history of the respondents showed no significant difference. Linear regression showed that the variables of height, body weight, and IMT had a correlation with the QRMA coefficient value.Conclusion: The QRMA tool was not able to provide a picture of the actual condition of the blood glucose level of the respondents when compared with the results of the anamnesis and the blood glucose value from the capillary blood glucose test. Non-invasive health measurement devices such as QRMA are not used by nurses as a standard for determining the health status of DM patients." @default.
- W3005087882 created "2020-02-14" @default.
- W3005087882 creator A5019466789 @default.
- W3005087882 creator A5048530178 @default.
- W3005087882 creator A5077532182 @default.
- W3005087882 date "2020-01-21" @default.
- W3005087882 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W3005087882 title "Comparison between the QRMA Measurement with the Anamnesis and the Capillary Blood Glucose Test" @default.
- W3005087882 cites W1695820897 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W1703488077 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W1974685557 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W1984910516 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2022371556 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2030958070 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2046399478 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2069099947 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2085190680 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2096845934 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2096965060 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2110472697 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2112149778 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2138605610 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2147693676 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2150894223 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2151559267 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W2171957007 @default.
- W3005087882 cites W4240986128 @default.
- W3005087882 doi "https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v14i2.6154" @default.
- W3005087882 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3005087882 type Work @default.
- W3005087882 sameAs 3005087882 @default.
- W3005087882 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3005087882 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3005087882 hasAuthorship W3005087882A5019466789 @default.
- W3005087882 hasAuthorship W3005087882A5048530178 @default.
- W3005087882 hasAuthorship W3005087882A5077532182 @default.
- W3005087882 hasBestOaLocation W30050878821 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConcept C145333580 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConcept C2780092901 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConcept C2780485761 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConceptScore W3005087882C105795698 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConceptScore W3005087882C126322002 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConceptScore W3005087882C134018914 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConceptScore W3005087882C145333580 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConceptScore W3005087882C2780092901 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConceptScore W3005087882C2780485761 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConceptScore W3005087882C33923547 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConceptScore W3005087882C555293320 @default.
- W3005087882 hasConceptScore W3005087882C71924100 @default.
- W3005087882 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W3005087882 hasLocation W30050878821 @default.
- W3005087882 hasLocation W30050878822 @default.
- W3005087882 hasOpenAccess W3005087882 @default.
- W3005087882 hasPrimaryLocation W30050878821 @default.
- W3005087882 hasRelatedWork W1563850031 @default.
- W3005087882 hasRelatedWork W2045367862 @default.
- W3005087882 hasRelatedWork W2074686124 @default.
- W3005087882 hasRelatedWork W2233866314 @default.
- W3005087882 hasRelatedWork W2415348801 @default.
- W3005087882 hasRelatedWork W2415759662 @default.
- W3005087882 hasRelatedWork W2474093686 @default.
- W3005087882 hasRelatedWork W2898136804 @default.
- W3005087882 hasRelatedWork W3027379633 @default.
- W3005087882 hasRelatedWork W3036934084 @default.
- W3005087882 hasVolume "14" @default.
- W3005087882 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3005087882 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3005087882 magId "3005087882" @default.
- W3005087882 workType "article" @default.