Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3006271294> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 84 of
84
with 100 items per page.
- W3006271294 endingPage "211" @default.
- W3006271294 startingPage "191" @default.
- W3006271294 abstract "Abstract The Scharff technique aims to elicit information by affecting the source's perception of the interviewer's existing knowledge. Although the technique has been found to be effective for gathering new information, countermeasures to the technique have not been examined. In a 2 × 2 between‐subjects experiment, we informed half of the 120 sources about the counter‐interrogation strategy of carefully considering the interviewer's prior knowledge and the tactic of providing information perceived as already known to the interviewer. After this, sources were interviewed with the Scharff technique or the Direct approach, widely used in human intelligence‐gathering situations and consisting of open‐ended and direct questions. We found that “informed sources” did not succeed in revealing information already known to the interviewer, where informed sources and uninformed sources revealed known information to a similar degree (1.62 pieces vs. 1.65 pieces). Sources interviewed with the Direct approach (vs. Scharff technique) revealed a larger amount of information previously known to the interviewer (2.18 pieces vs. 1.08 pieces). When interviewed with the Scharff technique, sources informed about the counter‐interrogation strategy attempted to adopt more counter‐interrogation strategies. The present study replicates earlier research on the Scharff technique as a technique effective in affecting the source's perception of the interviewer's prior knowledge. The results of the current study indicate that both the Scharff technique and the Direct approach might be similarly robust against counter‐interrogation strategies, in terms of gathering new information. Future studies should focus on implementing more comprehensive training in counter‐interrogation strategies for the sources." @default.
- W3006271294 created "2020-02-24" @default.
- W3006271294 creator A5031588047 @default.
- W3006271294 creator A5036150510 @default.
- W3006271294 creator A5048185817 @default.
- W3006271294 creator A5051998991 @default.
- W3006271294 creator A5088529118 @default.
- W3006271294 date "2020-02-14" @default.
- W3006271294 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W3006271294 title "Eliciting intelligence from sources informed about counter‐interrogation strategies: An experimental study on the Scharff technique" @default.
- W3006271294 cites W1939922925 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W1946359496 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W1960342581 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W1977668472 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W1977732557 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2018538132 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2040676391 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2047425182 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2129497853 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2135037881 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2143890501 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2145494710 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2145519172 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2155624184 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2175861156 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2315381883 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2319415860 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2328041309 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2533030975 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2590682119 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2604868554 @default.
- W3006271294 cites W2976234471 @default.
- W3006271294 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1542" @default.
- W3006271294 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3006271294 type Work @default.
- W3006271294 sameAs 3006271294 @default.
- W3006271294 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W3006271294 countsByYear W30062712942020 @default.
- W3006271294 countsByYear W30062712942022 @default.
- W3006271294 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3006271294 hasAuthorship W3006271294A5031588047 @default.
- W3006271294 hasAuthorship W3006271294A5036150510 @default.
- W3006271294 hasAuthorship W3006271294A5048185817 @default.
- W3006271294 hasAuthorship W3006271294A5051998991 @default.
- W3006271294 hasAuthorship W3006271294A5088529118 @default.
- W3006271294 hasBestOaLocation W30062712942 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConcept C24845683 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConcept C2776240099 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConceptScore W3006271294C15744967 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConceptScore W3006271294C169760540 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConceptScore W3006271294C17744445 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConceptScore W3006271294C199539241 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConceptScore W3006271294C24845683 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConceptScore W3006271294C26760741 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConceptScore W3006271294C2776240099 @default.
- W3006271294 hasConceptScore W3006271294C77805123 @default.
- W3006271294 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W3006271294 hasLocation W30062712941 @default.
- W3006271294 hasLocation W30062712942 @default.
- W3006271294 hasOpenAccess W3006271294 @default.
- W3006271294 hasPrimaryLocation W30062712941 @default.
- W3006271294 hasRelatedWork W1185158565 @default.
- W3006271294 hasRelatedWork W1545377504 @default.
- W3006271294 hasRelatedWork W188996418 @default.
- W3006271294 hasRelatedWork W2004315729 @default.
- W3006271294 hasRelatedWork W2048630529 @default.
- W3006271294 hasRelatedWork W2499358169 @default.
- W3006271294 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W3006271294 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W3006271294 hasRelatedWork W3006271294 @default.
- W3006271294 hasRelatedWork W95088071 @default.
- W3006271294 hasVolume "17" @default.
- W3006271294 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3006271294 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3006271294 magId "3006271294" @default.
- W3006271294 workType "article" @default.