FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3006961670> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3006961670 endingPage "S278" @default.
• W3006961670 startingPage "S278" @default.
• W3006961670 abstract "Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for roughly 3% of adult malignancies and 95% of primary kidney neoplasms. Increasing earlier diagnosis of the disease, specifically in the case of small renal masses (SRM) (<4 cm) has been noted, with 74,000 new cases of RCC in the US in 2019. Treatment options for SRM patients ranges from active surveillance to ablative therapy, to surgery with varying standard guideline recommendations depending on comorbidities and staging. This study evaluated outcomes of patients with SRM T1a RCC that underwent nephrectomies and/or ablations. Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of 351 patients at Beaumont Royal Oak diagnosed with SRM RCC from 1996-2019 was completed. Patient data including demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative complications, and outcomes were collected and compared between patients who received a nephrectomy or ablation. 155 SRM patients included 64 nephrectomies in 63 patients, 166 ablations in 139 patients. Four patients received both treatments. Mean follow-up length was 23 months. Patients managed surgically were younger (70 years vs. 74, P = 0.0002) and had a longer length of stay (3.5 days vs. 1.0, P <0.0001). The total number of procedures was less for those receiving surgery (P = 0.006). Comorbidities were similar between groups, with a higher percentage of ablation patients with underlying type II diabetes (31% vs. 16% surgery patients, P = 0.043). Intraoperative complications that included postop ileus, ARDS, pneumothorax, urinary retention, hematoma was significantly different (P = 0.038). While there were 22 recurrences in the ablation group, there were only 2 observed in surgical patients. There were no observed differences in the number of EC visits within 30 days of the index procedure, nor were there differences in the overall outcomes. This study found that patients had similar demographics and comorbidities, but underwent different initial management for their RCC. Long-term outcomes in the two groups were similar, but differences in initial therapy led to different management courses. Future studies will compare the cost-effectiveness of these two management strategies." @default.
• W3006961670 created "2020-03-06" @default.
• W3006961670 creator A5022334827 @default.
• W3006961670 creator A5035614521 @default.
• W3006961670 creator A5086857774 @default.
• W3006961670 creator A5088391795 @default.
• W3006961670 date "2020-03-01" @default.
• W3006961670 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3006961670 title "Abstract No. 641 Single-institution analysis of renal cell carcinoma treatment modalities: nephrectomy versus ablation" @default.
• W3006961670 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2019.12.702" @default.
• W3006961670 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3006961670 type Work @default.
• W3006961670 sameAs 3006961670 @default.
• W3006961670 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3006961670 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3006961670 hasAuthorship W3006961670A5022334827 @default.
• W3006961670 hasAuthorship W3006961670A5035614521 @default.
• W3006961670 hasAuthorship W3006961670A5086857774 @default.
• W3006961670 hasAuthorship W3006961670A5088391795 @default.
• W3006961670 hasBestOaLocation W30069616701 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConcept C2777472916 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConcept C2778014663 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConcept C2778329176 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConcept C2778902805 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConcept C2780227381 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConceptScore W3006961670C126322002 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConceptScore W3006961670C141071460 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConceptScore W3006961670C2777472916 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConceptScore W3006961670C2778014663 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConceptScore W3006961670C2778329176 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConceptScore W3006961670C2778902805 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConceptScore W3006961670C2780091579 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConceptScore W3006961670C2780227381 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConceptScore W3006961670C2780813298 @default.
• W3006961670 hasConceptScore W3006961670C71924100 @default.
• W3006961670 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3006961670 hasLocation W30069616701 @default.
• W3006961670 hasOpenAccess W3006961670 @default.
• W3006961670 hasPrimaryLocation W30069616701 @default.
• W3006961670 hasRelatedWork W1976968719 @default.
• W3006961670 hasRelatedWork W1977631863 @default.
• W3006961670 hasRelatedWork W2011177479 @default.
• W3006961670 hasRelatedWork W2366721150 @default.
• W3006961670 hasRelatedWork W2464875427 @default.
• W3006961670 hasRelatedWork W2471039675 @default.
• W3006961670 hasRelatedWork W2607670575 @default.
• W3006961670 hasRelatedWork W2978457763 @default.
• W3006961670 hasRelatedWork W2991973758 @default.
• W3006961670 hasRelatedWork W3093185831 @default.
• W3006961670 hasVolume "31" @default.
• W3006961670 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3006961670 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3006961670 magId "3006961670" @default.
• W3006961670 workType "article" @default.