FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3006961682> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3006961682 endingPage "270" @default.
• W3006961682 startingPage "261" @default.
• W3006961682 abstract "Rationale and Objectives The relative competitiveness of radiology and the number of first-choice applicants to diagnostic radiology have steadily declined over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to identify factors contributing to the declining interest in diagnostic radiology as a career and to explore factors affecting specialty choice. Materials and Methods A retrospective survey was distributed to resident physicians at a single academic center between July and August 2017. Participants identified factors affecting career choice and evaluated level of agreement with statements regarding radiology using 5-point Likert scales. Higher scores indicated stronger agreement. Results One hundred and fifty-two resident physicians from Canada participated (21.5% response rate): 20 radiology and 132 nonradiology. Of the total, 27% were registered in postgraduate year (PGY) 1, 23% in PGY 2, 15% in PGY 3, 19% in PGY 4, and 16% in PGY 5, or above. Sixty-one percent of the respondents self-reported as female, 34% as male, and 5% as other/unknown. Of those in radiology, 40% self-reported as female, 55% as male, and 5% as other/unknown, compared to 64% female, 31% male, and 5% other/unknown in other specialties. Regardless of specialty, positive clinical/mentoring experiences strongly affected career choice. Radiology residents were attracted to diverse pathology (M = 4.5) and positive staff/resident interactions (M = 4.4). Nonradiology residents were deterred by lack of patient contact (M = 3.9) and dark work environment (M = 3.6). Resident physicians who had applied to radiology were more likely to report positive mentorship during medical school, disagree that technology will replace radiologists, and desire a higher income specialty (Wald = 56.6, p < 0.001). More recent graduates showed a higher level of concern regarding the potential negative impact of technology and outsourcing on the profession (F (3, 189) = 2.6, p = 0.05). Several trainees (21%) considered radiology, but lacked mentorship (52%) and identified job market concerns (29%). Conclusion More recent graduates are relatively more concerned about technology replacing radiologists, and radiology applicants have less concern about artificial intelligence replacing radiologists. As positive interactions with radiologists and mentorship are key influencers, our results advocate for early training exposure and reinforcement regarding the positive outlook of the profession. The relative competitiveness of radiology and the number of first-choice applicants to diagnostic radiology have steadily declined over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to identify factors contributing to the declining interest in diagnostic radiology as a career and to explore factors affecting specialty choice. A retrospective survey was distributed to resident physicians at a single academic center between July and August 2017. Participants identified factors affecting career choice and evaluated level of agreement with statements regarding radiology using 5-point Likert scales. Higher scores indicated stronger agreement. One hundred and fifty-two resident physicians from Canada participated (21.5% response rate): 20 radiology and 132 nonradiology. Of the total, 27% were registered in postgraduate year (PGY) 1, 23% in PGY 2, 15% in PGY 3, 19% in PGY 4, and 16% in PGY 5, or above. Sixty-one percent of the respondents self-reported as female, 34% as male, and 5% as other/unknown. Of those in radiology, 40% self-reported as female, 55% as male, and 5% as other/unknown, compared to 64% female, 31% male, and 5% other/unknown in other specialties. Regardless of specialty, positive clinical/mentoring experiences strongly affected career choice. Radiology residents were attracted to diverse pathology (M = 4.5) and positive staff/resident interactions (M = 4.4). Nonradiology residents were deterred by lack of patient contact (M = 3.9) and dark work environment (M = 3.6). Resident physicians who had applied to radiology were more likely to report positive mentorship during medical school, disagree that technology will replace radiologists, and desire a higher income specialty (Wald = 56.6, p < 0.001). More recent graduates showed a higher level of concern regarding the potential negative impact of technology and outsourcing on the profession (F (3, 189) = 2.6, p = 0.05). Several trainees (21%) considered radiology, but lacked mentorship (52%) and identified job market concerns (29%). More recent graduates are relatively more concerned about technology replacing radiologists, and radiology applicants have less concern about artificial intelligence replacing radiologists. As positive interactions with radiologists and mentorship are key influencers, our results advocate for early training exposure and reinforcement regarding the positive outlook of the profession." @default.
• W3006961682 created "2020-03-06" @default.
• W3006961682 creator A5010566936 @default.
• W3006961682 creator A5016790773 @default.
• W3006961682 creator A5058451062 @default.
• W3006961682 creator A5081943902 @default.
• W3006961682 date "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3006961682 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W3006961682 title "Resident Physicians' Perceptions of Diagnostic Radiology and the Declining Interest in the Specialty" @default.
• W3006961682 cites W1968596184 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W1978962207 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2027005378 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2031800585 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2073730060 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2074652861 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2104588916 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2128712686 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2140690972 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2271784028 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2290088065 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2339730171 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2613589491 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2855469196 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2893371469 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W2900248733 @default.
• W3006961682 cites W4234020189 @default.
• W3006961682 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.016" @default.
• W3006961682 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32089466" @default.
• W3006961682 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3006961682 type Work @default.
• W3006961682 sameAs 3006961682 @default.
• W3006961682 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W3006961682 countsByYear W30069616822022 @default.
• W3006961682 countsByYear W30069616822023 @default.
• W3006961682 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3006961682 hasAuthorship W3006961682A5010566936 @default.
• W3006961682 hasAuthorship W3006961682A5016790773 @default.
• W3006961682 hasAuthorship W3006961682A5058451062 @default.
• W3006961682 hasAuthorship W3006961682A5081943902 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConcept C20387591 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConceptScore W3006961682C105776082 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConceptScore W3006961682C126838900 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConceptScore W3006961682C138496976 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConceptScore W3006961682C15744967 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConceptScore W3006961682C20387591 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConceptScore W3006961682C512399662 @default.
• W3006961682 hasConceptScore W3006961682C71924100 @default.
• W3006961682 hasFunder F4320311526 @default.
• W3006961682 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3006961682 hasLocation W30069616821 @default.
• W3006961682 hasOpenAccess W3006961682 @default.
• W3006961682 hasPrimaryLocation W30069616821 @default.
• W3006961682 hasRelatedWork W1754602832 @default.
• W3006961682 hasRelatedWork W1841185769 @default.
• W3006961682 hasRelatedWork W2025069761 @default.
• W3006961682 hasRelatedWork W2049214470 @default.
• W3006961682 hasRelatedWork W2072926321 @default.
• W3006961682 hasRelatedWork W2110286869 @default.
• W3006961682 hasRelatedWork W2518937418 @default.
• W3006961682 hasRelatedWork W2902148150 @default.
• W3006961682 hasRelatedWork W3033540421 @default.
• W3006961682 hasRelatedWork W4237050928 @default.
• W3006961682 hasVolume "28" @default.
• W3006961682 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3006961682 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3006961682 magId "3006961682" @default.
• W3006961682 workType "article" @default.