FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3008089259> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3008089259 endingPage "331" @default.
• W3008089259 startingPage "316" @default.
• W3008089259 abstract "Editor's Note: This article is a reprint of a previously published article. For citation purposes, please use the original publication details: Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(3S):21-35. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF/Task Force) represents one of several efforts to take a more evidence-based approach to the development of clinical practice guidelines. As methods have matured for assembling and reviewing evidence and for translating evidence into guidelines, so too have the methods of the USPSTF. This paper summarizes the current methods of the third USPSTF, supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and two of the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs). The Task Force limits the topics it reviews to those conditions that cause a large burden of suffering to society and that also have available a potentially effective preventive service. It focuses its reviews on the questions and evidence most critical to making a recommendation. It uses analytic frameworks to specify the linkages and key questions connecting the preventive service with health outcomes. These linkages, together with explicit inclusion criteria, guide the literature searches for admissible evidence. Once assembled, admissible evidence is reviewed at three strata: (1) the individual study, (2) the body of evidence concerning a single linkage in the analytic framework, and (3) the body of evidence concerning the entire preventive service. For each stratum, the Task Force uses explicit criteria as general guidelines to assign one of three grades of evidence: good, fair, or poor. Good or fair quality evidence for the entire preventive service must include studies of sufficient design and quality to provide an unbroken chain of evidence-supported linkages, generalizable to the general primary care population, that connect the preventive service with health outcomes. Poor evidence contains a formidable break in the evidence chain such that the connection between the preventive service and health outcomes is uncertain. For services supported by overall good or fair evidence, the Task Force uses outcomes tables to help categorize the magnitude of benefits, harms, and net benefit from implementation of the preventive service into one of four categories: substantial, moderate, small, or zero/negative. The Task Force uses its assessment of the evidence and magnitude of net benefit to make a recommendation, coded as a letter: from A (strongly recommended) to D (recommend against). It gives an I recommendation in situations in which the evidence is insufficient to determine net benefit. The third Task Force and the EPCs will continue to examine a variety of methodologic issues and document work group progress in future communications." @default.
• W3008089259 created "2020-03-06" @default.
• W3008089259 creator A5001758658 @default.
• W3008089259 creator A5011604065 @default.
• W3008089259 creator A5021605006 @default.
• W3008089259 creator A5031204654 @default.
• W3008089259 creator A5036643072 @default.
• W3008089259 creator A5080277145 @default.
• W3008089259 creator A5085955825 @default.
• W3008089259 date "2020-03-01" @default.
• W3008089259 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3008089259 title "REPRINT OF: Current Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: A Review of the Process" @default.
• W3008089259 cites W1548123452 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W1965862679 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W1975898692 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W1975925983 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W1978237326 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2003871702 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2004035013 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2034401866 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2052107185 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2063772100 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2066829527 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2074740603 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2076287638 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2111041321 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2126426045 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2129829737 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2129979467 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2154317905 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2159452348 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2160490608 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2160610993 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W2325332048 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W4232959875 @default.
• W3008089259 cites W4327766583 @default.
• W3008089259 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.001" @default.
• W3008089259 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32087860" @default.
• W3008089259 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3008089259 type Work @default.
• W3008089259 sameAs 3008089259 @default.
• W3008089259 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3008089259 countsByYear W30080892592021 @default.
• W3008089259 countsByYear W30080892592022 @default.
• W3008089259 countsByYear W30080892592023 @default.
• W3008089259 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3008089259 hasAuthorship W3008089259A5001758658 @default.
• W3008089259 hasAuthorship W3008089259A5011604065 @default.
• W3008089259 hasAuthorship W3008089259A5021605006 @default.
• W3008089259 hasAuthorship W3008089259A5031204654 @default.
• W3008089259 hasAuthorship W3008089259A5036643072 @default.
• W3008089259 hasAuthorship W3008089259A5080277145 @default.
• W3008089259 hasAuthorship W3008089259A5085955825 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C141330323 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C2778489119 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C2985871740 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C108170787 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C111919701 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C121332964 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C1276947 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C141330323 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C142724271 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C144024400 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C144133560 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C161191863 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C162324750 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C162853370 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C17744445 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C187736073 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C189708586 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C19648533 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C199539241 @default.
• W3008089259 hasConceptScore W3008089259C204787440 @default.

• next