FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3008209451> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3008209451 endingPage "328" @default.
• W3008209451 startingPage "319" @default.
• W3008209451 abstract "Aim There has been a significant reduction in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures recorded in Australia. This follows several national joint registry studies documenting high UKA revision rates when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the recent introduction of robotically assisted UKA procedures, it is hoped that outcomes improve. This study examines the cumulative revision rate of UKA procedures implanted with a newly introduced robotic system and compares the results to one of the best performing non-robotically assisted UKA prostheses, as well as all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures. Methods Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR) for all UKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis (OA) between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. Procedures using the Restoris MCK UKA prosthesis implanted using the Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted System were compared to non-robotically assisted Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System (ZUK) UKA, a commonly used UKA with previously reported good outcomes and to all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship. Results There was no difference in the rate of revision when the Mako-assisted Restoris UKA was compared to the ZUK UKA (zero to nine months: HR 1.14 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.83; p = 0.596) vs nine months and over: HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.02; p = 0.058)). The Mako-assisted Restoris had a significantly lower overall revision rate compared to the other types of non-robotically assisted procedures (HR 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.79); p < 0.001) at three years. Revision for aseptic loosening was lower for the Mako-assisted Restoris compared to all other non-robotically assisted UKA (entire period: HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.65); p = 0.001), but not the ZUK prosthesis. However, revision for infection was significantly higher for the Mako-assisted Restoris compared to the two comparator groups (ZUK: entire period: HR 2.91 (95% CI 1.22 to 6.98; p = 0.016); other non-robotically assisted UKA: zero to three months: HR 5.57 (95% CI 2.17 to 14.31; p < 0.001)). Conclusion This study reports comparable short-term survivorship for the Mako robotically assisted UKA compared to the ZUK UKA and improved survivorship compared to all other non-robotic UKA. These results justify the continued use and investigation of this procedure. However, the higher rate of early revision for infection for robotically assisted UKA requires further investigation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):319–328" @default.
• W3008209451 created "2020-03-06" @default.
• W3008209451 creator A5028907064 @default.
• W3008209451 creator A5030300245 @default.
• W3008209451 creator A5070270336 @default.
• W3008209451 creator A5084059301 @default.
• W3008209451 date "2020-03-01" @default.
• W3008209451 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3008209451 title "The three-year survivorship of robotically assisted versus non-robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty" @default.
• W3008209451 cites W111175327 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W1530620771 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W1549748060 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W155545896 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W1916847362 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W1951577291 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W1970701570 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W1979585204 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W1984312339 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W1987055022 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W1998675132 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W1999006733 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2011777638 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2012458472 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2023791479 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2046442221 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2051137872 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2059126365 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2075897322 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2077576923 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2084559676 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2090524088 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2095851869 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2109815548 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2112013878 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2131489812 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2138858052 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2145072709 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2206415500 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2255026035 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2261630086 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2269428437 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2292394324 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2315256677 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2336876189 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2337163526 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2581925796 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2587052315 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2615266555 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2622099214 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2770778321 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2789568888 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2791625101 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2800262214 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2808753163 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2873226450 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2886693097 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2891088257 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2908459602 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2923608161 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2929118637 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2948505666 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2953658570 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2965797570 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W2974685724 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W3096918848 @default.
• W3008209451 cites W4236056714 @default.
• W3008209451 doi "https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.102b3.bjj-2019-0713.r1" @default.
• W3008209451 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32114810" @default.
• W3008209451 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3008209451 type Work @default.
• W3008209451 sameAs 3008209451 @default.
• W3008209451 citedByCount "54" @default.
• W3008209451 countsByYear W30082094512020 @default.
• W3008209451 countsByYear W30082094512021 @default.
• W3008209451 countsByYear W30082094512022 @default.
• W3008209451 countsByYear W30082094512023 @default.
• W3008209451 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3008209451 hasAuthorship W3008209451A5028907064 @default.
• W3008209451 hasAuthorship W3008209451A5030300245 @default.
• W3008209451 hasAuthorship W3008209451A5070270336 @default.
• W3008209451 hasAuthorship W3008209451A5084059301 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C172400760 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C207103383 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C2778829800 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConceptScore W3008209451C126322002 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConceptScore W3008209451C141071460 @default.
• W3008209451 hasConceptScore W3008209451C142724271 @default.

• next