FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3008441472> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3008441472 endingPage "539" @default.
• W3008441472 startingPage "515" @default.
• W3008441472 abstract "Background The concept of fluency is widely used to dichotomously classify aphasia syndromes in both research and clinical practice. Despite its ubiquity, reliability of fluency measurement is reduced due to its multi-dimensional nature and the variety of methods used to measure it.Aims The primary aim of the study was to determine what factors contribute to judgements of fluency in aphasia, identifying methodological and linguistic sources of disagreement.Methods & Procedures We compared fluency classifications generated according to fluency scores on the revised Western Aphasia Battery (WAB-R) to clinical impressions of fluency for 254 English-speaking people with aphasia (PwA) from the AphasiaBank database. To determine what contributed to fluency classifications, we examined syndrome diagnoses and measured the predictive strength of 18 spontaneous speech variables extracted from retellings of the Cinderella story. The variables were selected to represent three dimensions predicted to underlie fluency: grammatical competence, lexical retrieval, and the facility of speech production.Outcomes & Results WAB-R fluency classifications agreed with 83% of clinician classifications, although agreement was much greater for fluent than nonfluent classifications. The majority of mismatches were diagnosed with anomic or conduction aphasia by the WAB-R but Broca’s aphasia by clinicians. Modifying the WAB-R scale improved the extent to which WAB-R fluency categories matched clinical impressions. Fluency classifications were predicted by a combination of variables, including aspects of grammaticality, lexical retrieval and speech production. However, fluency classification by WAB-R was largely predicted by severity, whereas the presence or absence of apraxia of speech was the largest predictor of fluency classifications by clinicians.Conclusions Fluency judgements according to WAB-R scoring and those according to clinical impression showed some common influences, but also some differences that contributed to mismatches in fluency categorization. We propose that, rather than using dichotomous fluency categories, which can mask sources of disagreement, fluency should be explicitly identified relative to the underlying deficits (word-finding, grammatical formulation, speech production, or a combination) contributing to each individual PwA’s fluency profile. Identifying what contributes to fluency disruptions is likely to generate more reliable diagnoses and provide more concrete guidance regarding therapy, avenues we are pursuing in ongoing research." @default.
• W3008441472 created "2020-03-06" @default.
• W3008441472 creator A5030733846 @default.
• W3008441472 creator A5051151745 @default.
• W3008441472 date "2020-02-27" @default.
• W3008441472 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W3008441472 title "Fluent or nonfluent? Part A. Underlying contributors to categorical classifications of fluency in aphasia" @default.
• W3008441472 cites W1583424596 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W1981889376 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W1984600737 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W1990482142 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W1994365362 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W1994997260 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W1999318234 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W1999906512 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2006187106 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2006286148 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2009387924 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2012785120 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2014208400 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2017490251 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2029140263 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2037338961 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2048347373 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2049492651 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2051361926 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2058624171 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2060770722 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2078963496 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2080846588 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2086178996 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2100619427 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2104836160 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2110934885 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2114074514 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2121926385 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2150416383 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2158919382 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2165743480 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2343836310 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2478295692 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2509528580 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2553610436 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2616548203 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2784128235 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2802384372 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2885542845 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2891550207 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2893827325 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W2979372098 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W3012388293 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W4293569649 @default.
• W3008441472 cites W968449327 @default.
• W3008441472 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1727709" @default.
• W3008441472 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3008441472 type Work @default.
• W3008441472 sameAs 3008441472 @default.
• W3008441472 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W3008441472 countsByYear W30084414722020 @default.
• W3008441472 countsByYear W30084414722021 @default.
• W3008441472 countsByYear W30084414722022 @default.
• W3008441472 countsByYear W30084414722023 @default.
• W3008441472 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3008441472 hasAuthorship W3008441472A5030733846 @default.
• W3008441472 hasAuthorship W3008441472A5051151745 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConcept C2777413886 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConcept C2779422653 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConceptScore W3008441472C138885662 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConceptScore W3008441472C145420912 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConceptScore W3008441472C15744967 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConceptScore W3008441472C180747234 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConceptScore W3008441472C2777413886 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConceptScore W3008441472C2779422653 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConceptScore W3008441472C41895202 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConceptScore W3008441472C548259974 @default.
• W3008441472 hasConceptScore W3008441472C71924100 @default.
• W3008441472 hasFunder F4320307170 @default.
• W3008441472 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3008441472 hasLocation W30084414721 @default.
• W3008441472 hasOpenAccess W3008441472 @default.
• W3008441472 hasPrimaryLocation W30084414721 @default.
• W3008441472 hasRelatedWork W122979221 @default.
• W3008441472 hasRelatedWork W1979192573 @default.
• W3008441472 hasRelatedWork W2010967707 @default.
• W3008441472 hasRelatedWork W2041745738 @default.
• W3008441472 hasRelatedWork W2092876913 @default.
• W3008441472 hasRelatedWork W2112487509 @default.
• W3008441472 hasRelatedWork W2276983060 @default.
• W3008441472 hasRelatedWork W2356848460 @default.
• W3008441472 hasRelatedWork W2372795522 @default.
• W3008441472 hasRelatedWork W2510337802 @default.

• next