Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3008911095> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 55 of
55
with 100 items per page.
- W3008911095 abstract "Following previous literature within the context of feedback instruction (Bangert-Downs et al., 2013; Butler & Roediger, 2008; Butler & Winne, 1995; Hattie & Timperley, 2007; Kapp et al., 2015; Karpicke, & Roediger, 2007, 2008; Llorens, et al., 2014; Manez, Vidal-Abarca & Martinez, 2016; Manez, Vidal-Abarca, Martinez & Kendeu, 2017; Newman, Williams & Hiller, 1974; Narciss, 2013; Narciss et al., 2014; van der Kleij, Eggen, Timmers, & Veldkamp, 2012; van der Kleij, et al., 2015; Vidal-Abarca et al., 2017; Vidal-Abarca, Martinez, Ferrer & Garcia, 2017), the general objective of the present thesis is the evaluation of the effectiveness of a formative feedback question-answering procedure that provides feedback in an immediate and delayed manner. Students read a text in Sciences and answered inferential questions while having the text available. In addition, the level of integration of the elaborative feedback message is specifically designed to provide students with a relation of the most relevant ideas from the text in an attempt to help them comprehend the learning content in a more coherent manner. Study 1 analyzes the impact of a question-answering procedure that provides feedback in an immediate (question by question) or delayed manner (after the completion of four questions) compared to a no-feedback condition where students were forced to rereading a text. Dependent measures included the student´s probability to correct errors, response certitude estimations, question-answering performance and online behaviour on a sample of undergraduate university students. Additionally, Study 2 dives into the issue of what type of level of integration of the elaborative feedback message is more beneficial for concept learning when provided in an immediate, delayed summative or delayed integrative form. In this study, the effects of the task level (i.e., low versus high-level) and further individual differences in previous background knowledge of students are considered and discussed under the light of the recent literature in reading comprehension and learning from the text (Gilabert, Martinez, & Vidal-Abarca, 2005; Le Bigot & Rouet, 2007; McNamara & Kintsch, 1996; Priebe, Keenan, & Miller, 2011; O´ Really & Sabatini, 2013; Ozuru et al., 2007; Salmeron, Kintsch & Canas, 2006; Vidal-Abarca & SanJose, 1998; Clemens et al., 2018). Conclusions and limitations embrace some of the most critical points on the role of formative feedback for concept learning and question-answering with an available text. Educational implications are further discussed." @default.
- W3008911095 created "2020-03-06" @default.
- W3008911095 creator A5047870739 @default.
- W3008911095 date "2019-01-01" @default.
- W3008911095 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W3008911095 title "Effects of timing and level of integration of formative feedback in question- answering for concept learning" @default.
- W3008911095 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W3008911095 type Work @default.
- W3008911095 sameAs 3008911095 @default.
- W3008911095 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3008911095 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3008911095 hasAuthorship W3008911095A5047870739 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConcept C42525527 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConcept C44291984 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConceptScore W3008911095C145420912 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConceptScore W3008911095C151730666 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConceptScore W3008911095C154945302 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConceptScore W3008911095C15744967 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConceptScore W3008911095C2779343474 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConceptScore W3008911095C41008148 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConceptScore W3008911095C42525527 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConceptScore W3008911095C44291984 @default.
- W3008911095 hasConceptScore W3008911095C86803240 @default.
- W3008911095 hasLocation W30089110951 @default.
- W3008911095 hasOpenAccess W3008911095 @default.
- W3008911095 hasPrimaryLocation W30089110951 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W1504544391 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W1505845994 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W1537666025 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W1567962495 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W1667804006 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W1685479522 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W172026149 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W202877670 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W20294854 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W2082703751 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W2338928972 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W2398845157 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W2408103701 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W3010060618 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W3121852282 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W369650640 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W45171620 @default.
- W3008911095 hasRelatedWork W576321134 @default.
- W3008911095 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3008911095 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3008911095 magId "3008911095" @default.
- W3008911095 workType "article" @default.