FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3009223301> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3009223301 endingPage "3248" @default.
• W3009223301 startingPage "3241" @default.
• W3009223301 abstract "Introduction: Recently laser usage became popular in pediatric dentistry due to its efficiently in cutting enamel and dentin without pain, and with lesser vibration and noise, which leads to roughness in the structure of dental tissue like the etching process, which is the first indication for composite restorations cavity preparation. Due to the morphological differences and heterogeneous composition, of primary teeth compared to permanent teeth, the parameters of laser should be differently set. Materials and methods: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of bond prep mode and cutting mode of Er, Cr: YSGG laser in primary molars on shear bond strength of composite resin and conventional flowable composite using applied on flattened buccal and lingual surface on forty-eight freshly extracted sound natural deciduous molars divided into 2 groups and each group is subdivided into 2 subgroups each according to the mode of preparation: into: group 1: bond prep mode Er,Cr:YSGG laser which were further divided into: subgroup A: composite resin and subgroup B: conventional flowable composite, and group 2: cutting mode Er,Cr:YSGG which were further divided into: subgroup A: composite resin and subgroup B: conventional flowable composite. The samples were subjected to universal testing machine. Results: The mean (SD) values for shear bond strength of Bond prep and cutting modes regardless of restorative material were 22.8 (2.7) and 19.4 (2.7), respectively. Bond prep mode showed statistically significantly higher mean shear bond strength than cutting mode (P-value <0.001, Effect size = 0.296). The mean (SD) values for shear bond strength of composite resin and conventional flowable composite regardless of preparation mode were 20.7 (3.1) and 21.4 (3.3), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two restorations (P-value = 0.394, Effect size = 0.017). Conclusion: The bond prep mode is better than cutting mode, Er,Cr:YSGG Laser irradiation improves shear bond stress and no significant difference between composite resin and conventional flowable composite clinically." @default.
• W3009223301 created "2020-03-13" @default.
• W3009223301 creator A5066289522 @default.
• W3009223301 date "2019-10-01" @default.
• W3009223301 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3009223301 title "Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin and Conventional Flowable Composite in Primary Molars Prepared by Bond prep mode and Cutting mode Er, Cr:YSGG Laser (an in vitro study)" @default.
• W3009223301 cites W1562181994 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W1582680720 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W1967679324 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W2065468365 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W2071026824 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W2096769639 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W2104049917 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W2142565888 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W2166735648 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W2408198013 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W2583083370 @default.
• W3009223301 cites W82908716 @default.
• W3009223301 doi "https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2019.74000" @default.
• W3009223301 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W3009223301 type Work @default.
• W3009223301 sameAs 3009223301 @default.
• W3009223301 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3009223301 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3009223301 hasAuthorship W3009223301A5066289522 @default.
• W3009223301 hasBestOaLocation W30092233011 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConcept C159096172 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConceptScore W3009223301C104779481 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConceptScore W3009223301C159096172 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConceptScore W3009223301C159985019 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConceptScore W3009223301C192562407 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConceptScore W3009223301C199343813 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConceptScore W3009223301C202271784 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConceptScore W3009223301C2779227376 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConceptScore W3009223301C68928338 @default.
• W3009223301 hasConceptScore W3009223301C71924100 @default.
• W3009223301 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3009223301 hasLocation W30092233011 @default.
• W3009223301 hasOpenAccess W3009223301 @default.
• W3009223301 hasPrimaryLocation W30092233011 @default.
• W3009223301 hasRelatedWork W2005496670 @default.
• W3009223301 hasRelatedWork W2229997013 @default.
• W3009223301 hasRelatedWork W2890006035 @default.
• W3009223301 hasRelatedWork W2900524175 @default.
• W3009223301 hasRelatedWork W3043268847 @default.
• W3009223301 hasRelatedWork W3048672776 @default.
• W3009223301 hasRelatedWork W3142048519 @default.
• W3009223301 hasRelatedWork W4285010844 @default.
• W3009223301 hasRelatedWork W2187463733 @default.
• W3009223301 hasRelatedWork W2463824739 @default.
• W3009223301 hasVolume "65" @default.
• W3009223301 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3009223301 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3009223301 magId "3009223301" @default.
• W3009223301 workType "article" @default.