FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3009678933> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3009678933 endingPage "2494" @default.
• W3009678933 startingPage "2478" @default.
• W3009678933 abstract "Abstract This study investigated the characteristics of peer discussions used to support formative assessment in lectures, facilitated by a student response system, in an undergraduate qualitative methods course for psychology students. The intent was to examine the characteristics of peer discussions in which student response systems are used to facilitate the practice of formative assessment lectures. The research was guided by the following research questions: (1) What patterns of talk can be identified in the discussions? (2) How do the students use subject‐specific vocabulary in the discussions? (3) How the students’ understanding of the subject matter displayed in these discussions? To examine the characteristics of peer interactions, 87 student discussions were recorded and analysed. The concept of exploratory talk was used as a lens to examine the discussions. In 68 of the 87 discussions, the students exchanged ideas and elaborated on their peers’ ideas and understanding of the concepts. In the remaining 25 discussions, the process of reasoning was less visible. The findings are relevant for teaching designs that aims to use digital tools to facilitate formative assessment. Practitioner Notes What is already known about this topic Student response systems can support formative assessment and feedback in lectures. The most common approaches used in research on student response systems to support formative assessment is questionnaires or interviews. Few studies have provided detailed analyses of clicker‐supported peer discussions. What the paper adds Provides insights into the micro‐processes in clicker‐supported discussions. Critically discusses the role of discussions facilitated by student response systems to support formative feedback in the classroom. The paper contributes to scholarship in this field by drawing attention to the qualities of the activities created for formative assessment. Discusses the validity of the inferences drawn from the use of student response systems in the classroom. Implications for policy and practice Analysis of discussions shows that there is not necessarily a correlation between aggregated answers and students' understanding. To ensure that valid inferences can be drawn from activities as a basis for feedback, the questions used and threats to the validity of possible inferences should be critically examined." @default.
• W3009678933 created "2020-03-13" @default.
• W3009678933 creator A5008485023 @default.
• W3009678933 creator A5040090723 @default.
• W3009678933 creator A5082649276 @default.
• W3009678933 date "2020-03-05" @default.
• W3009678933 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W3009678933 title "Behind the scenes: Unpacking student discussion and critical reflection in lectures" @default.
• W3009678933 cites W1167547842 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W1817853878 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W1958106547 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W1984748091 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W1985474114 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W1991564778 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2005189990 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2093146590 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2093493808 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2104279103 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2108224345 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2122513519 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2127573943 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2134154929 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2137816502 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2138228303 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2142714438 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2152299374 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2188413387 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2287497148 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2300065122 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2333419867 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2337237329 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2532605078 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2560140854 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2888750555 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2937428390 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W2979926784 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W4238283258 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W645038235 @default.
• W3009678933 cites W89090828 @default.
• W3009678933 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12922" @default.
• W3009678933 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3009678933 type Work @default.
• W3009678933 sameAs 3009678933 @default.
• W3009678933 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W3009678933 countsByYear W30096789332020 @default.
• W3009678933 countsByYear W30096789332021 @default.
• W3009678933 countsByYear W30096789332022 @default.
• W3009678933 countsByYear W30096789332023 @default.
• W3009678933 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3009678933 hasAuthorship W3009678933A5008485023 @default.
• W3009678933 hasAuthorship W3009678933A5040090723 @default.
• W3009678933 hasAuthorship W3009678933A5082649276 @default.
• W3009678933 hasBestOaLocation W30096789331 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C2777256151 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C2777601683 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C2778208468 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C42525527 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConcept C85973986 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C138885662 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C144024400 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C145420912 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C15744967 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C190248442 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C19165224 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C19417346 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C2777256151 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C2777601683 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C2778208468 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C36289849 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C41895202 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C42525527 @default.
• W3009678933 hasConceptScore W3009678933C85973986 @default.
• W3009678933 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W3009678933 hasLocation W30096789331 @default.
• W3009678933 hasLocation W30096789332 @default.
• W3009678933 hasLocation W30096789333 @default.
• W3009678933 hasOpenAccess W3009678933 @default.
• W3009678933 hasPrimaryLocation W30096789331 @default.
• W3009678933 hasRelatedWork W173650695 @default.
• W3009678933 hasRelatedWork W2081381996 @default.
• W3009678933 hasRelatedWork W2494092622 @default.
• W3009678933 hasRelatedWork W2511960889 @default.
• W3009678933 hasRelatedWork W2605526034 @default.
• W3009678933 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3009678933 hasRelatedWork W2979926784 @default.
• W3009678933 hasRelatedWork W2992187193 @default.
• W3009678933 hasRelatedWork W3009678933 @default.
• W3009678933 hasRelatedWork W4234233375 @default.
• W3009678933 hasVolume "51" @default.

• next