FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3011861390> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3011861390 endingPage "633" @default.
• W3011861390 startingPage "625" @default.
• W3011861390 abstract "Abstract Objectives To compare the accuracy of an original and two newly designed CAD/CAM scan bodies used in digital impressions with one another as well as conventional implant impressions. Material and methods A reference model containing four implants was fabricated. Digital impressions were taken using an intraoral scanner with different scan bodies: original scan bodies for Group I (DO), CAD/CAM scan bodies without extensional structure for Group II (DC), and CAD/CAM scan bodies with extensional structure for Group III (DCE). For Group IV, conventional splinted open‐tray impressions (CI) were taken. The reference model and conventional stone casts were digitalized with a laboratory reference scanner. The Standard Tessellation Language datasets were imported into an inspection software for trueness and precision assessment. Statistical analysis was performed with a Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn–Bonferroni test. The level of significance was set at α = .05. Results The median of trueness was 35.85, 38.50, 28.45, and 25.55 μm for Group I, II, III, and IV, respectively. CI was more accurate than DO ( p = .015) and DC ( p = .002). The median of precision was 48.40, 48.90, 27.30, and 19.00 for Group I, II, III, and IV, respectively. CI was more accurate than DO ( p < .001), DC ( p < .001), and DCE ( p = .007). DCE was more accurate than DC ( p < .001) and DO ( p < .001). Conclusions The design of the extensional structure could significantly improve scanning accuracy. Conventional splinted open‐tray impressions were more accurate than digital impressions for full‐arch implant rehabilitation." @default.
• W3011861390 created "2020-03-23" @default.
• W3011861390 creator A5010937817 @default.
• W3011861390 creator A5017709527 @default.
• W3011861390 creator A5020604191 @default.
• W3011861390 creator A5035056608 @default.
• W3011861390 creator A5040701052 @default.
• W3011861390 creator A5046066530 @default.
• W3011861390 date "2020-04-03" @default.
• W3011861390 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W3011861390 title "Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: An in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete‐arch implant rehabilitation" @default.
• W3011861390 cites W1720254180 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W1971717191 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2032225689 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2053950666 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2054893337 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2084055205 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2091349471 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2128376260 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2136013011 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2170615395 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2179774036 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2346428001 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2346777927 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2400679692 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2509061139 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2511565211 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2553045019 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2564010596 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2591252179 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2755414793 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2772159282 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2795991124 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2806821272 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2808974892 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2895818263 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2897807229 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2928079782 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2941370257 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2948864212 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2953472821 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2955573363 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W2980697921 @default.
• W3011861390 cites W832296139 @default.
• W3011861390 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13598" @default.
• W3011861390 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32181919" @default.
• W3011861390 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3011861390 type Work @default.
• W3011861390 sameAs 3011861390 @default.
• W3011861390 citedByCount "51" @default.
• W3011861390 countsByYear W30118613902020 @default.
• W3011861390 countsByYear W30118613902021 @default.
• W3011861390 countsByYear W30118613902022 @default.
• W3011861390 countsByYear W30118613902023 @default.
• W3011861390 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3011861390 hasAuthorship W3011861390A5010937817 @default.
• W3011861390 hasAuthorship W3011861390A5017709527 @default.
• W3011861390 hasAuthorship W3011861390A5020604191 @default.
• W3011861390 hasAuthorship W3011861390A5035056608 @default.
• W3011861390 hasAuthorship W3011861390A5040701052 @default.
• W3011861390 hasAuthorship W3011861390A5046066530 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C127808970 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C194789388 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C199639397 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C2776684213 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C2779751349 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C105795698 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C127413603 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C127808970 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C136229726 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C136764020 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C141071460 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C154945302 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C194789388 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C199343813 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C199639397 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C2776684213 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C2779751349 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C2781411149 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C29694066 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C2989005 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C33923547 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C41008148 @default.
• W3011861390 hasConceptScore W3011861390C71924100 @default.
• W3011861390 hasIssue "7" @default.

• next