Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3012396279> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W3012396279 endingPage "1350" @default.
- W3012396279 startingPage "1350" @default.
- W3012396279 abstract "Background: Recent years have witnessed a rise in rate of primary caesarean section (CS). No. of women reporting with a previous CS scar is also increasing. Judicious trial of labor in such patients can prevent repeat caesarean section. Aim of this study was to assessing the safety and success rate of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) in selected cases of patients who have undergone previous lower segment CS (LSCS) is the main aim of this study.Methods: In this prospective observational study carried out in a tertiary care teaching hospital over a period of 1 year. 375 pregnant women with a history of one previous LSCS for non-recurrent indications were enrolled. The statistical technique of t-test was administered for relative comparison with respect to maternal and neonatal complications across the two groups, i.e. repeat LSCS and vaginal delivery.Results: Out of 375 patients 187 patients (49.9%) underwent elective LSCS for recurrent indication and for non-recurrent indication associated with some complicating factor. Trial of labor in 188 (50.10%) was given out of which 59.3% had spontaneous vaginal delivery,7.20% had instrumental delivery and 33.50% landed into emergency CS. Commonest cause of Em. LSCS being Fetal distress. As regards maternal complications, no statistically significant difference was found between the Repeat LSCS and Vaginal delivery groups (t = 0.779, p > 0.05). On similar lines, there was no statistically significant difference across both groups as regards neonatal complications (t = 0.632, p > 0.05).Conclusions: Taking into account the increased trend of primary CS, trial of VBAC in selected cases is very important. It can be concluded that VBAC has chances of success in cases with previous one LSCS but it must be carefully investigated and monitored." @default.
- W3012396279 created "2020-03-23" @default.
- W3012396279 creator A5035006914 @default.
- W3012396279 creator A5060602077 @default.
- W3012396279 date "2020-03-25" @default.
- W3012396279 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3012396279 title "Assessing the pros and cons of vaginal birth after caesarean relative to elective repeat caesarean section" @default.
- W3012396279 doi "https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20201085" @default.
- W3012396279 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3012396279 type Work @default.
- W3012396279 sameAs 3012396279 @default.
- W3012396279 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3012396279 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3012396279 hasAuthorship W3012396279A5035006914 @default.
- W3012396279 hasAuthorship W3012396279A5060602077 @default.
- W3012396279 hasBestOaLocation W30123962791 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C172680121 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C2776279924 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C2778408130 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C2780109559 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C2909237780 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C3017887849 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C131872663 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C142724271 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C172680121 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C23131810 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C2776279924 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C2778408130 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C2779234561 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C2780109559 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C2909237780 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C29456083 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C3017887849 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C54355233 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C71924100 @default.
- W3012396279 hasConceptScore W3012396279C86803240 @default.
- W3012396279 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W3012396279 hasLocation W30123962791 @default.
- W3012396279 hasOpenAccess W3012396279 @default.
- W3012396279 hasPrimaryLocation W30123962791 @default.
- W3012396279 hasRelatedWork W1980217758 @default.
- W3012396279 hasRelatedWork W2166676175 @default.
- W3012396279 hasRelatedWork W2360685968 @default.
- W3012396279 hasRelatedWork W2417300353 @default.
- W3012396279 hasRelatedWork W2430503066 @default.
- W3012396279 hasRelatedWork W2489224797 @default.
- W3012396279 hasRelatedWork W2557191728 @default.
- W3012396279 hasRelatedWork W2805785677 @default.
- W3012396279 hasRelatedWork W3085353958 @default.
- W3012396279 hasRelatedWork W3166588699 @default.
- W3012396279 hasVolume "9" @default.
- W3012396279 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3012396279 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3012396279 magId "3012396279" @default.
- W3012396279 workType "article" @default.